Home
Resource
Dangerous women and macho men: preserving sexual difference in Orizaba Mexico, 1920-1940
PDF
PDF format is widely accepted and good for printing.
Plug-in required
PDF-1(897.48 kb)
Citation & Export
View Usage Statistics
Staff View

Citation & Export
Hide

Simple citation

Swedberg, Gregory. Dangerous women and macho men: preserving sexual difference in Orizaba Mexico, 1920-1940. Retrieved from https://doi.org/doi:10.7282/T3TB1799

Export

Click here for information about Citation Management Tools at Rutgers.

Statistics
Hide

Description

Uniform TitleDangerous women and macho men: preserving sexual difference in Orizaba Mexico, 1920-1940
NameSwedberg, Gregory (author); Wasserman, Mark (chair); Kaplan, Temma (internal member); Hewitt, Nancy (internal member); Jimenez, Christina (outside member); Rutgers University; Graduate School - New Brunswick
Date Created2007
Other Date2007 (degree)
SubjectHistory, Sex role--Mexico--History, Women--Mexico--Social conditions--History, Mexico--Social life and customs, Mexico
Extentvi, 261 pages
DescriptionThis dissertation explores how citizens and legal officials in Orizaba, Mexico interpreted the national project to restructure gender relations following the momentous revolution of 1910-1920. I argue that the state's project to modernize sexual difference by providing education, job protection, and expanding rights in the family for women was part of larger mission to insure that women would be capable mothers and wives. Women, however, sometimes capitalized on these legal changes to challenge men's authority which created multiple tensions in the workplace, family and community. Moreover, laws aimed at preserving sexual difference often created unintended consequences that ultimately challenged state efforts to modernize patriarchy, masculinity, and femininity. My research demonstrates that family, labor, community, and state policy are not mutually exclusive categories but rather each informs the other. In addition, the state's push to modernize gender relations while preserving sexual difference conflicted with anterior forms of masculinity. Women's education and their expanded rights in the family and the workplace conflicted with working class men's belief that the revolution had redeemed their dignity which should then reinforce their power.
NotePh.D.
NoteIncludes bibliographical references (p. 240-259).
Genretheses, ETD doctoral
Persistent URLhttps://doi.org/doi:10.7282/T3TB1799
LanguageEnglish
CollectionGraduate School - New Brunswick Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Organization NameRutgers, The State University of New Jersey
RightsThe author owns the copyright to this work.
Version 8.5.5
Rutgers University Libraries - Copyright ©2024