Home
Resource
The use of motivational interviewing techniques to enhance the efficacy of guided self-help behavioral weight loss treatment
PDF
PDF format is widely accepted and good for printing.
Plug-in required
PDF-1(290.33 kb)
Citation & Export
View Usage Statistics
Staff View

Citation & Export
Hide

Simple citation

DiMarco, Ilyse Dobrow. The use of motivational interviewing techniques to enhance the efficacy of guided self-help behavioral weight loss treatment. Retrieved from https://doi.org/doi:10.7282/T3X63N9K

Export

Click here for information about Citation Management Tools at Rutgers.

Statistics
Hide

Description

Uniform TitleThe use of motivational interviewing techniques to enhance the efficacy of guided self-help behavioral weight loss treatment
NameDiMarco, Ilyse Dobrow (author); Wilson, G. Terence (chair); Karlin, Robert (internal member); Mohlman, Jan (internal member); Loeb, Katharine (outside member); Rutgers University; Graduate School - New Brunswick
Date Created2008
Other Date2008-05 (degree)
SubjectPsychology, Weight loss--Treatment, Weight loss--Psychological aspects, Self-efficacy
Extentviii, 72 pages
DescriptionThis study assessed whether motivational interviewing (MI), applied as part of a standard guided self-help (GSH) behavioral weight loss treatment, reduced attrition rate and improved participant weight loss and other eating-related and general psychological measures. The study also included assessments based on two theories of motivated behavior, to assess whether these measures predicted treatment outcome and whether MI increased participant motivation. Thirty-nine overweight patients (7 males, 32 females) were randomized to receive either 6 sessions of traditional GSH and 2 traditional motivation-focused sessions (GSH); or 6 GSH sessions and 2 sessions utilizing an MI approach to motivation (MI/GSH). In intention-to-treat and completer analyses, significant differences were found in the areas of eating concern and control over eating, favoring MI/GSH. Between-group effect size estimates indicated a small to medium advantage for MI/GSH over GSH in weight loss, as well as on a number of secondary eating-related measures. Analyses of motivational measures indicated no significant differences by treatment group, but suggested that individuals who were more confident in their abilities to change and endorsed more extrinsic reasons for change lost more weight than other participants. Implications and future directions are discussed.
NotePh.D.
NoteIncludes bibliographical references (p. 65-70).
Genretheses, ETD doctoral
Persistent URLhttps://doi.org/doi:10.7282/T3X63N9K
LanguageEnglish
CollectionGraduate School - New Brunswick Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Organization NameRutgers, The State University of New Jersey
RightsThe author owns the copyright to this work.
Version 8.5.5
Rutgers University Libraries - Copyright ©2024