Staff View
A comparison among major value-added models

Descriptive

TypeOfResource
Text
TitleInfo (ID = T-1)
Title
A comparison among major value-added models
SubTitle
a general model approach
PartName
PartNumber
NonSort
Identifier (displayLabel = ); (invalid = )
ETD_2410
Identifier (type = hdl)
http://hdl.rutgers.edu/1782.2/rucore10001600001.ETD.000052266
Language (objectPart = )
LanguageTerm (authority = ISO639-2); (type = code)
eng
Genre (authority = marcgt)
theses
Subject (ID = SBJ-1); (authority = RUETD)
Topic
Education
Subject (ID = SBJ-2); (authority = ETD-LCSH)
Topic
School improvement programs--Mathematical models
Subject (ID = SBJ-3); (authority = ETD-LCSH)
Topic
School management and organization--Mathematical models
Subject (ID = SBJ-4); (authority = ETD-LCSH)
Topic
Effective teaching
Subject (ID = SBJ-5); (authority = ETD-LCSH)
Topic
Educational accountability
Abstract
Value-added models (VAMs) are becoming increasingly popular within accountability-based educational policies as they purport to separate out the effects of teacher and schools from student background variables. Given the fact that evaluations based on the inappropriate use of VAMs would significantly impact students, teachers and schools in a high-stake environment, the literature has advocated empirical evaluations of VAM measures before they become formal components of accountability systems. The VAM label is attached to a number of models, which range from simple to highly sophisticated models. However, in practice, educators and policymakers are often being misled into believing that these approaches give nearly identical results, and making decisions without understanding the strengths and limitations of these models. In addition, the empirical evaluations to date have shown that the VAM measures of teacher effects are sensitive to the form of the statistical model and to whether and how student background variables are controlled.
This study proposes a multivariate joint general VAM to investigate the issues raised by the applications of all the currently prominent VAMs, which can be seen as restricted cases of this general model. The general model provides a framework for comparing the restricted models and for evaluating the sensitivity of VAM measures (e.g., teacher and school effects) to the model choice. Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm is used in a Bayesian context to implement both the general and the restricted models.
A simulation study was conducted to investigate the feasibility and robustness of the general model when the data were generated under varying assumptions. For each condition, three consecutive years of testing scores were generated for 400 students grouped into 16 classes. Real data consisting of three years of longitudinally linked student-level data from a large statewide achievement testing program were also analyzed. The results show that the proposed general model is more robust than other models to different assumptions and the inclusion of the background variable has significant impact on some models when the school/class has an unbalanced mix of advantaged and disadvantaged students.
PhysicalDescription
Form (authority = gmd)
electronic resource
Extent
xiv, 108 p. : ill.
InternetMediaType
application/pdf
InternetMediaType
text/xml
Note (type = degree)
Ph.D.
Note (type = bibliography)
Includes bibliographical references (p. 104-107)
Note (type = statement of responsibility)
by Yuan Hong
Name (ID = NAME-1); (type = personal)
NamePart (type = family)
Hong
NamePart (type = given)
Yuan
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB); (type = )
author
DisplayForm
Yuan Hong
Name (ID = NAME-2); (type = personal)
NamePart (type = family)
de la Torre
NamePart (type = given)
Jimmy
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB); (type = )
chair
Affiliation
Advisory Committee
DisplayForm
Jimmy de la Torre
Name (ID = NAME-3); (type = personal)
NamePart (type = family)
Camilli
NamePart (type = given)
Gregory
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB); (type = )
internal member
Affiliation
Advisory Committee
DisplayForm
Gregory Camilli
Name (ID = NAME-4); (type = personal)
NamePart (type = family)
Baker
NamePart (type = given)
Bruce
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB); (type = )
internal member
Affiliation
Advisory Committee
DisplayForm
Bruce Baker
Name (ID = NAME-5); (type = personal)
NamePart (type = family)
Yao
NamePart (type = given)
Lihua
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB); (type = )
outside member
Affiliation
Advisory Committee
DisplayForm
Lihua Yao
Name (ID = NAME-1); (type = corporate)
NamePart
Rutgers University
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB); (type = )
degree grantor
Name (ID = NAME-2); (type = corporate)
NamePart
Graduate School - New Brunswick
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB); (type = )
school
OriginInfo
DateCreated (point = ); (qualifier = exact)
2010
DateOther (qualifier = exact); (type = degree)
2010-01
Place
PlaceTerm (type = code)
xx
RelatedItem (type = host)
TitleInfo
Title
Rutgers University Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Identifier (type = RULIB)
ETD
RelatedItem (type = host)
TitleInfo
Title
Graduate School - New Brunswick Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Identifier (type = local)
rucore19991600001
Location
PhysicalLocation (authority = marcorg); (displayLabel = Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey)
NjNbRU
Identifier (type = doi)
doi:10.7282/T3J38SQ2
Genre (authority = ExL-Esploro)
ETD doctoral
Back to the top

Rights

RightsDeclaration (AUTHORITY = GS); (ID = rulibRdec0006)
The author owns the copyright to this work.
Copyright
Status
Copyright protected
Notice
Note
Availability
Status
Open
Reason
Permission or license
Note
RightsHolder (ID = PRH-1); (type = personal)
Name
FamilyName
Hong
GivenName
Yuan
Role
Copyright Holder
RightsEvent (AUTHORITY = rulib); (ID = RE-1)
Type
Permission or license
Label
Place
DateTime
2010-01-06 11:52:10
Detail
AssociatedEntity (AUTHORITY = rulib); (ID = AE-1)
Role
Copyright holder
Name
Yuan Hong
Affiliation
Rutgers University. Graduate School - New Brunswick
AssociatedObject (AUTHORITY = rulib); (ID = AO-1)
Type
License
Name
Author Agreement License
Detail
I hereby grant to the Rutgers University Libraries and to my school the non-exclusive right to archive, reproduce and distribute my thesis or dissertation, in whole or in part, and/or my abstract, in whole or in part, in and from an electronic format, subject to the release date subsequently stipulated in this submittal form and approved by my school. I represent and stipulate that the thesis or dissertation and its abstract are my original work, that they do not infringe or violate any rights of others, and that I make these grants as the sole owner of the rights to my thesis or dissertation and its abstract. I represent that I have obtained written permissions, when necessary, from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis or dissertation and will supply copies of such upon request by my school. I acknowledge that RU ETD and my school will not distribute my thesis or dissertation or its abstract if, in their reasonable judgment, they believe all such rights have not been secured. I acknowledge that I retain ownership rights to the copyright of my work. I also retain the right to use all or part of this thesis or dissertation in future works, such as articles or books.
RightsEvent (AUTHORITY = rulib); (ID = RE-2)
Type
Embargo
Label
Place
DateTime
Detail
730 days
AssociatedObject (AUTHORITY = ); (ID = )
Type
Detail
Back to the top

Technical

ContentModel
ETD
MimeType (TYPE = file)
application/pdf
MimeType (TYPE = container)
application/x-tar
FileSize (UNIT = bytes)
1034240
Checksum (METHOD = SHA1)
b2eda7590750d2722aa25ea2859809f404463473
Back to the top
Version 8.5.5
Rutgers University Libraries - Copyright ©2024