Staff View
Moving beyond Black History Month

Descriptive

TypeOfResource
Text
TitleInfo (ID = T-1)
Title
Moving beyond Black History Month
SubTitle
how three teachers interpreted and implemented the New Jersey Amistad legislation
Identifier
ETD_2276
Identifier (type = hdl)
http://hdl.rutgers.edu/1782.2/rucore10001500001.ETD.000052895
Language
LanguageTerm (authority = ISO639-2); (type = code)
English
Genre (authority = marcgt)
theses
Subject (ID = SBJ-1); (authority = RUETD)
Topic
Social and Philosophical Foundations of Education
Subject (ID = SBJ-2); (authority = ETD-LCSH)
Topic
African American History Month--New Jersey
Subject (ID = SBJ-3); (authority = ETD-LCSH)
Topic
Mandates--New Jersey
Subject (ID = SBJ-4); (authority = ETD-LCSH)
Topic
Education--Curricula--Law and legislation--New Jersey
Subject (ID = SBJ-5); (authority = ETD-LCSH)
Topic
Teaching--New Jersey
Subject (ID = SBJ-6); (authority = lcsh/lcnaf)
Abstract (type = abstract)
Since abolition of slavery, the United States has struggled to recognize people of color, specifically African-Americans, as equal citizens worthy of equal education. For several generations, within the curriculum of American schools, students have been taught the narrative of American History with a Eurocentric perspective. However, the Civil Rights Movement of the 1960s motivated various leaders, researchers, and scholars to question the validity of this narrative. Through debates, reforms, and legislations, there has been a demand for the contributions, achievements, and perspectives of people of the African Diaspora to become parallel to the European narrative. Although research and academic literature examines the need for the inclusion of multiple perspectives within the history curriculum, few studies go in depth about the perspective of history teachers on mandated curriculum related to the inclusion of race and race relations within the history curriculum. There remains a need to explore the perceptions teachers have about these legislations and the methods used within the classroom to successfully implement these reforms. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine how three New Jersey history teachers interpreted the New Jersey Amistad Bill and how they considered their context when implementing this mandated curriculum within their class lessons. PURPOSE: Based on the guidance of a pilot study that focused on one teacher’s perception of the New Jersey Amistad Bill and the consideration of the educational approaches of Ethnic Studies, Africana Studies, and Multicultural Education, this research sought to understand how New Jersey secondary teachers perceived the Amistad legislation and the purpose and recommendations of the Amistad Commission. This project allowed teachers to challenge their present pedagogy by providing a format for them to examine how their educational and racial past might influence their teaching experiences. Based on the literature review, the research will consider the role of Ethnic Studies, Africana Studies, and Multicultural Education, the three theoretical and educational approaches to the incorporation of race within the history curriculum, to better understand how to implement the Amistad Law. RESEARCH QUESTIONS: In an effort to understand how this legislative change of the New Jersey Amistad Bill impacts schools and classrooms, this research study was guided by the following research questions: 1. How do three New Jersey public school teachers interpret the Amistad Bill? 2. According to the teachers, how has the New Jersey Amistad Commission and the professional development provided by the commission supported them? 3. What approaches are these three teachers using as they attempt to implement the Amistad legislation? 4. What are the similarities and/or differences in the interpretation and implementation of the Amistad Bill between these three teachers? METHODOLOGY: In this qualitative study, I used a case study methodology to explore three schools selected based on their demographics: predominately Black, predominately White, and diverse settings. One teacher per school, who attended the New Jersey Amistad Summer Institute – a professional development opportunity provided by the state during the summer of 2006 – participated in a total of two interviews, completed a five journal entries, and was observed for ten class sessions. Interview, observation, journal transcripts, field notes, and documents were coded based on the research questions and across the cases based on patterns. Through the application of theoretical analysis procedures, assertions were noted and themes were identified within the study. The use of triangulation within the data collection and data analysis processes was used to establish reliability and validity for this study through the use of multiple data collection methods, the inclusion of direct teacher and student quotation, and the use of member check by the teacher participants. FINDINGS: This research revealed how three New Jersey history teachers were able to implement the mandated curriculum of the New Jersey Amistad Bill within their respective classrooms: by being self-aware of the need to include the perspective of Africans and African Americans within the history curriculum, by being willing to increase their knowledge base of African and African American history, and by being responsive to the needs of their students. Each teacher was aware of the role of race and race relations not only within their past experience but also within the community in which they taught and their own classrooms. Because of this awareness, each teacher developed a level of comfort with the expectations of the Amistad Bill, a willingness to continue to educate themselves, and a dedication to adjust the curriculum to respond to the needs of their specific students. SIGNIFICANCE: This study examined how legislated change impacted how three teachers implemented the New Jersey Amistad Bill within their classrooms. Acknowledging the lack of research about how to incorporate discussions of race and race relations within predominately white, predominately black, and diverse classrooms, this study has direct implications to teacher education, practicing teachers, and policymakers. Pre-service teachers must become aware of the law and its requirements and be exposed to the supporting resources. With administrative support, practicing teachers should be required to attend workshops that address the complexity of race, help them examine their own perceptions, become more aware of the legislative requirements, and learn how to understand the needs of their students. Finally, policymakers should provide administrators and teachers with concrete and virtual resources as well as mandated workshops. Therefore, this study addressed the multiple gaps in the literature as well as provided significant information about effective implementation designs relevant to the New Jersey Amistad legislation.
PhysicalDescription
Form (authority = gmd)
electronic resource
Extent
x, 213 p. : ill.
InternetMediaType
application/pdf
InternetMediaType
text/xml
Note (type = degree)
Ed.D.
Note (type = bibliography)
Includes bibliographical references
Note
Includes abstract
Note (type = statement of responsibility)
by Steffany A. Baptiste
Name (ID = NAME-1); (type = personal)
NamePart (type = family)
Baptiste
NamePart (type = given)
Steffany A.
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
author
DisplayForm
Steffany Baptiste
Name (ID = NAME-2); (type = personal)
NamePart (type = family)
Rubin, Ph.D.
NamePart (type = given)
Beth C.
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
chair
Affiliation
Advisory Committee
DisplayForm
Beth C. Rubin, Ph.D.
Name (ID = NAME-3); (type = personal)
NamePart (type = family)
Giarelli, Ph.D.
NamePart (type = given)
James M.
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
co-chair
Affiliation
Advisory Committee
DisplayForm
James M. Giarelli, Ph.D.
Name (ID = NAME-4); (type = personal)
NamePart (type = family)
Ryan, Ed.D.
NamePart (type = given)
Sharon K.
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
co-chair
Affiliation
Advisory Committee
DisplayForm
Sharon K. Ryan, Ed.D.
Name (ID = NAME-1); (type = corporate)
NamePart
Rutgers University
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
degree grantor
Name (ID = NAME-2); (type = corporate)
NamePart
Graduate School of Education
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
school
OriginInfo
DateCreated (qualifier = exact)
2010
DateOther (qualifier = exact); (type = degree)
2010-01
Place
PlaceTerm (type = code)
xx
RelatedItem (type = host)
TitleInfo
Title
Rutgers University Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Identifier (type = RULIB)
ETD
RelatedItem (type = host)
TitleInfo
Title
Graduate School of Education Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Identifier (type = local)
rucore10001500001
Location
PhysicalLocation (authority = marcorg); (displayLabel = Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey)
NjNbRU
Identifier (type = doi)
doi:10.7282/T3H1324V
Genre (authority = ExL-Esploro)
ETD doctoral
Back to the top

Rights

RightsDeclaration (AUTHORITY = GS); (ID = rulibRdec0006)
The author owns the copyright to this work.
Copyright
Status
Copyright protected
Availability
Status
Open
Reason
Permission or license
RightsHolder (ID = PRH-1); (type = personal)
Name
FamilyName
Baptiste
GivenName
Steffany
Role
Copyright Holder
RightsEvent (ID = RE-1); (AUTHORITY = rulib)
Type
Permission or license
DateTime
2009-12-04 07:49:43
AssociatedEntity (ID = AE-1); (AUTHORITY = rulib)
Role
Copyright holder
Name
Steffany Baptiste
Affiliation
Rutgers University. Graduate School of Education
AssociatedObject (ID = AO-1); (AUTHORITY = rulib)
Type
License
Name
Author Agreement License
Detail
I hereby grant to the Rutgers University Libraries and to my school the non-exclusive right to archive, reproduce and distribute my thesis or dissertation, in whole or in part, and/or my abstract, in whole or in part, in and from an electronic format, subject to the release date subsequently stipulated in this submittal form and approved by my school. I represent and stipulate that the thesis or dissertation and its abstract are my original work, that they do not infringe or violate any rights of others, and that I make these grants as the sole owner of the rights to my thesis or dissertation and its abstract. I represent that I have obtained written permissions, when necessary, from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis or dissertation and will supply copies of such upon request by my school. I acknowledge that RU ETD and my school will not distribute my thesis or dissertation or its abstract if, in their reasonable judgment, they believe all such rights have not been secured. I acknowledge that I retain ownership rights to the copyright of my work. I also retain the right to use all or part of this thesis or dissertation in future works, such as articles or books.
Back to the top

Technical

ContentModel
ETD
MimeType (TYPE = file)
application/pdf
MimeType (TYPE = container)
application/x-tar
FileSize (UNIT = bytes)
727040
Checksum (METHOD = SHA1)
5be92e2f0058ba888bf770b57661e51712f5045e
Back to the top
Version 8.5.5
Rutgers University Libraries - Copyright ©2024