Regression analysis of self-regulatory concepts to predict community college math achievement and persistence
Descriptive
TitleInfo
(ID = T-1)
Title
Regression analysis of self-regulatory concepts to predict community college math achievement and persistence
Identifier
(type = hdl)
http://hdl.rutgers.edu/1782.2/rucore10001500001.ETD.000052901
Language
LanguageTerm
(authority = ISO639-2);
(type = code)
English
Genre
(authority = marcgt)
theses
Subject
(ID = SBJ-1);
(authority = RUETD)
Topic
Educational Statistics and Measurement
Subject
(ID = SBJ-2);
(authority = ETD-LCSH)
Topic
Mathematics--Study and teaching
Subject
(ID = SBJ-3);
(authority = ETD-LCSH)
Topic
Regression analysis--Mathematical models
Subject
(ID = SBJ-4);
(authority = ETD-LCSH)
Topic
Academic achievement
Subject
(ID = SBJ-5);
(authority = ETD-LCSH)
Abstract
Open door admissions at community colleges bring returning adults, first timers, low achievers, disabled persons, and immigrants. Passing and retention rates for remedial and non-developmental math courses can be comparatively inadequate (LAVC, 2005; CCPRDC, 2000; SBCC, 2004; Seybert & Soltz, 1992; Waycaster, 2002). Mathematics achievement historically has been a subject of concern with community colleges, universities, and primary schools (Davis, 1994; MEC, 1997; NCTM, 1989, 2000; Wang-Iverson, 1998). An important statistic of community colleges is that more than 83% of students work full or part-time (NEDRC, 2000; Phillippe & Patton, 2000). Conventional homework time estimates can range from 1-3 hours of homework for every hour of in-class instruction. Self-regulatory learning has been proposed to improve opportunity for math achievement (Bembenutty, 2005; Ironsmith et al., 2003; Jones & Byrnes, 2006; Pajares & Graham, 1999; Schunk, 1990). Seventeen research questions were made to explore the relative influences of goal setting, time planning, and time usage on mathematics achievement and persistence. Math students from 8 classes at a large, northeastern community college were administered 3 surveys asking self-regulatory questions.Results were found from descriptive statistics, frequency distributions, correlation matrices, t-tests, multiple regressions, and logistic regressions. Goal setting and time management were significant contributors in the model for predicting non-remedial students' final average. With respect to remedial students' final average, goal setting was related but all of the time planning and usage variables were not. Non-remedial students may have been more realistic about their course goals. However, non-remedial students were overly optimistic about allocating their time. No practical information regarding math student persistence beyond the first exam was found. Notable statistics from this study included: students spent about 5 to 6 hours per week on their math homework and over 80% worked at least 15 hours per week. Students worked more job hours on average than on all class homework. A possible recommendation to improve achievement is an extra class time for doing homework. Another implication is math educators, first-year workshops, and textbooks could teach the skills necessary for students to create suitable time management schedules and strategies that support students' course goals.
PhysicalDescription
Form
(authority = gmd)
electronic resource
InternetMediaType
application/pdf
InternetMediaType
text/xml
Note
(type = degree)
Ed.D.
Note
(type = bibliography)
Includes bibliographical references
Note
(type = statement of responsibility)
by Stephen Peter Gramlich
Name
(ID = NAME-1);
(type = personal)
NamePart
(type = family)
Gramlich
NamePart
(type = given)
Stephen Peter
Role
RoleTerm
(authority = RULIB)
author
DisplayForm
Stephen Gramlich
Name
(ID = NAME-2);
(type = personal)
NamePart
(type = family)
Smith
NamePart
(type = given)
Jeffrey K.
Role
RoleTerm
(authority = RULIB)
chair
Affiliation
Advisory Committee
DisplayForm
Jeffrey K. Smith
Name
(ID = NAME-3);
(type = personal)
NamePart
(type = family)
Weber
NamePart
(type = given)
Keith
Role
RoleTerm
(authority = RULIB)
internal member
Affiliation
Advisory Committee
Name
(ID = NAME-4);
(type = personal)
NamePart
(type = family)
Remshard
NamePart
(type = given)
Michael
Role
RoleTerm
(authority = RULIB)
outside member
Affiliation
Advisory Committee
DisplayForm
Michael Remshard
Name
(ID = NAME-1);
(type = corporate)
NamePart
Rutgers University
Role
RoleTerm
(authority = RULIB)
degree grantor
Name
(ID = NAME-2);
(type = corporate)
NamePart
Graduate School of Education
Role
RoleTerm
(authority = RULIB)
school
OriginInfo
DateCreated
(qualifier = exact)
2010
DateOther
(qualifier = exact);
(type = degree)
2010-05
Place
PlaceTerm
(type = code)
xx
RelatedItem
(type = host)
TitleInfo
Title
Rutgers University Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Identifier
(type = RULIB)
ETD
RelatedItem
(type = host)
TitleInfo
Title
Graduate School of Education Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Identifier
(type = local)
rucore10001500001
Location
PhysicalLocation
(authority = marcorg);
(displayLabel = Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey)
NjNbRU
Identifier
(type = doi)
doi:10.7282/T38G8KSS
Genre
(authority = ExL-Esploro)
ETD doctoral
Back to the top