Staff View
An event-related potential (ERP) study of attention allocation in the processing of a fear appeal and its relation to HPV vaccine acceptance

Descriptive

TypeOfResource
Text
TitleInfo (ID = T-1)
Title
An event-related potential (ERP) study of attention allocation in the processing of a fear appeal and its relation to HPV vaccine acceptance
Identifier
ETD_2520
Identifier (type = hdl)
http://hdl.rutgers.edu/1782.1/rucore10001600001.ETD.000053489
Language
LanguageTerm (authority = ISO639-2); (type = code)
eng
Genre (authority = marcgt)
theses
Subject (ID = SBJ-1); (authority = RUETD)
Topic
Psychology
Subject (ID = SBJ-2); (authority = ETD-LCSH)
Topic
Papillomaviruses--Vaccination
Subject (ID = SBJ-3); (authority = ETD-LCSH)
Topic
Nosophobia
Abstract (type = abstract)
The present study had two general aims. The primary purpose was to test whether varying the level of threat content in a fear appeal affects attention allocation to the communication. It was predicted that a high threat fear appeal would capture and sustain more attention than a low threat fear appeal and that this increase would facilitate deeper message processing. The second objective was to examine the effect of dispositional and personal relevance factors on the decision to obtain a vaccine that protects against strains of the Human Papillomavirus (HPV). To test these hypotheses, a sample of college women (n = 72) were randomly assigned to listen to either a high threat or low threat fear communication about HPV. A dual-task paradigm was used to measure attention allocation in real-time wherein participants listened to the fear appeal while completing an unrelated visual stimulus discrimination task. Measures of P300, an event-related potential (ERP) component believed to reflect resource allocation, were obtained during message exposure. A follow-up interview was conducted 6-weeks after the experimental session to assess vaccine uptake, information seeking behavior, and knowledge retention about HPV. Women who expressed intentions to obtain the HPV vaccine were more likely to have made plans to get the vaccine or were already vaccinated at the time of follow-up (OR = 29.18, CI = 1.53 to 557.53, p < .05). The high threat fear appeal was associated with more knowledge retention about HPV at the time of follow-up than the low threat communication, β = .38, p < .05. The results also suggest that attention allocation during message exposure was positively associated with HPV knowledge retention (β = .23, p < .05) and the likelihood of having obtained or made plans to obtain the vaccine (OR = 1.02, CI = 1.004 to 1.04, p < .05). In the high threat condition, number of sexual partners was positively associated with intentions to consult a doctor about HPV (β = .33, p < .05) and to talk to friends about the vaccine (β = .32, p < .05). However, lack of sexual activity, parental disapproval, and concerns over vaccine safety were the most cited reasons for not wanting or being unsure about the vaccine. The present study has made a significant methodological contribution by incorporating a dual-task paradigm and a real-time measure of attention allocation to assess message processing.
PhysicalDescription
Form (authority = gmd)
electronic resource
Extent
vii, 156 p. : ill.
InternetMediaType
application/pdf
InternetMediaType
text/xml
Note (type = degree)
Ph.D.
Note
Includes abstract
Note
Vita
Note (type = bibliography)
Includes bibliographical references
Note (type = statement of responsibility)
by AArathi Meenakshi Venkatesan
Name (ID = NAME-1); (type = personal)
NamePart (type = family)
Venkatesan
NamePart (type = given)
Aarathi
NamePart (type = date)
1979-
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
author
DisplayForm
Aarathi Venkatesan
Name (ID = NAME-2); (type = personal)
NamePart (type = family)
Contrada
NamePart (type = given)
Richard J
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
chair
Affiliation
Advisory Committee
DisplayForm
Richard J Contrada
Name (ID = NAME-3); (type = personal)
NamePart (type = family)
Chapman
NamePart (type = given)
Gretchen
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
internal member
Affiliation
Advisory Committee
DisplayForm
Gretchen Chapman
Name (ID = NAME-4); (type = personal)
NamePart (type = family)
Leventhal
NamePart (type = given)
Howard
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
internal member
Affiliation
Advisory Committee
DisplayForm
Howard Leventhal
Name (ID = NAME-5); (type = personal)
NamePart (type = family)
Yanovitzky
NamePart (type = given)
Itzhak
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
outside member
Affiliation
Advisory Committee
DisplayForm
Itzhak Yanovitzky
Name (ID = NAME-1); (type = corporate)
NamePart
Rutgers University
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
degree grantor
Name (ID = NAME-2); (type = corporate)
NamePart
Graduate School - New Brunswick
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
school
OriginInfo
DateCreated (qualifier = exact)
2010
DateOther (qualifier = exact); (type = degree)
2010
Place
PlaceTerm (type = code)
xx
RelatedItem (type = host)
TitleInfo
Title
Rutgers University Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Identifier (type = RULIB)
ETD
RelatedItem (type = host)
TitleInfo
Title
Graduate School - New Brunswick Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Identifier (type = local)
rucore19991600001
Location
PhysicalLocation (authority = marcorg); (displayLabel = Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey)
NjNbRU
Identifier (type = doi)
doi:10.7282/T3251J7K
Genre (authority = ExL-Esploro)
ETD doctoral
Back to the top

Rights

RightsDeclaration (AUTHORITY = GS); (ID = rulibRdec0006)
The author owns the copyright to this work.
Copyright
Status
Copyright protected
Availability
Status
Open
Reason
Permission or license
RightsHolder (ID = PRH-1); (type = personal)
Name
FamilyName
Venkatesan
GivenName
Aarathi
Role
Copyright Holder
RightsEvent (ID = RE-1); (AUTHORITY = rulib)
Type
Permission or license
DateTime
2010-03-31 12:59:45
AssociatedEntity (ID = AE-1); (AUTHORITY = rulib)
Role
Copyright holder
Name
Aarathi Venkatesan
Affiliation
Rutgers University. Graduate School - New Brunswick
AssociatedObject (ID = AO-1); (AUTHORITY = rulib)
Type
License
Name
Author Agreement License
Detail
I hereby grant to the Rutgers University Libraries and to my school the non-exclusive right to archive, reproduce and distribute my thesis or dissertation, in whole or in part, and/or my abstract, in whole or in part, in and from an electronic format, subject to the release date subsequently stipulated in this submittal form and approved by my school. I represent and stipulate that the thesis or dissertation and its abstract are my original work, that they do not infringe or violate any rights of others, and that I make these grants as the sole owner of the rights to my thesis or dissertation and its abstract. I represent that I have obtained written permissions, when necessary, from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis or dissertation and will supply copies of such upon request by my school. I acknowledge that RU ETD and my school will not distribute my thesis or dissertation or its abstract if, in their reasonable judgment, they believe all such rights have not been secured. I acknowledge that I retain ownership rights to the copyright of my work. I also retain the right to use all or part of this thesis or dissertation in future works, such as articles or books.
Back to the top

Technical

ContentModel
ETD
MimeType (TYPE = file)
application/pdf
MimeType (TYPE = container)
application/x-tar
FileSize (UNIT = bytes)
1607680
Checksum (METHOD = SHA1)
3b57f49131d07c4a3714ff12e7b11b1eb16d0340
Back to the top
Version 8.5.5
Rutgers University Libraries - Copyright ©2024