Home
Resource
Preschoolers' and adults' belief reasoning and task demand
PDF
PDF format is widely accepted and good for printing.
Plug-in required
PDF-1(937.67 kb)
Citation & Export
View Usage Statistics
Staff View

Citation & Export
Hide

Simple citation

Wang, Lu. Preschoolers' and adults' belief reasoning and task demand. Retrieved from https://doi.org/doi:10.7282/T36W99DF

Export

Click here for information about Citation Management Tools at Rutgers.

Statistics
Hide

Description

TitlePreschoolers' and adults' belief reasoning and task demand
NameWang, Lu (author); Leslie, Alam M. (chair); Gallistel, Charles Randy (internal member); Gelman, Rochel (internal member); Rutgers University; Graduate School - New Brunswick
Date Created2011
Other Date2011-05 (degree)
SubjectPsychology, Philosophy of mind in children, Philosophy of mind
Extentvi, 41 p. : ill.
DescriptionThirty-years research seemed to reveal that there is a U-shape development in children’s theory-of-mind abilities: infants have the competence to attribute false beliefs properly when measured by looking time and anticipatory eye gaze, while children younger than four systematically fail the standard false belief tasks measuring their voluntary responses. Why is it, and why does the infants’ implicit belief reasoning seem to be free from the inhibition and selection requirements? Are there really two systems, one explicit measured by verbal tasks and one implicit shown in non-verbal context, involved in theory-of-mind reasoning? We investigated preschoolers’ (experiment 1) and adults’ (experiment 2) belief attribution with the anticipatory looking method, in both a low-demand and high-demand false-belief reasoning tasks. Subjects’ nonverbal performances turned out to be better in the low-demand condition: they showed strong bias to look at the locations congruent with the actor’s false belief. However, neither adults’ nor children’s eye gaze in the high-demand condition showed belief-congruent anticipations. Besides, adults’ predictions were better with verbal responses than with nonverbal anticipatory eye gaze. Together, these results suggested that there are dual systems involved in belief reasoning, and the two systems share similar property in terms of their sensitivity to the task demands.
NoteM.S.
NoteIncludes bibliographical references
Noteby Lu Wang
Genretheses, ETD graduate
Persistent URLhttps://doi.org/doi:10.7282/T36W99DF
Languageeng
CollectionGraduate School - New Brunswick Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Organization NameRutgers, The State University of New Jersey
RightsThe author owns the copyright to this work.
Version 8.5.5
Rutgers University Libraries - Copyright ©2024