Home
Resource
Likelihood-based instrumental variable analysis in the presence of an unobserved latent confounder
PDF
PDF format is widely accepted and good for printing.
Plug-in required
PDF-1(866.88 kb)
Citation & Export
View Usage Statistics
Staff View

Citation & Export
Hide

Simple citation

Cao, Anjun. Likelihood-based instrumental variable analysis in the presence of an unobserved latent confounder. Retrieved from https://doi.org/doi:10.7282/T30C4TVJ

Export

Click here for information about Citation Management Tools at Rutgers.

Statistics
Hide

Description

TitleLikelihood-based instrumental variable analysis in the presence of an unobserved latent confounder
NameCao, Anjun (author); Moore, Dirk F (chair); Shih, Weichung Joe (internal member); LIN, YONG (internal member); Lu-Yao, Grace (outside member); Rutgers University; Graduate School - New Brunswick
Date Created2011
Other Date2011-10 (degree)
SubjectPublic Health, Instrumental variables (Statistics)
Extentxiii, 135 p. : ill.
DescriptionInstrumental variable analysis (IVA) is used to control unobserved confounders and estimate average causal effects in observational studies. Classical IVA involves a two-stage procedure with two ordinary linear models. The first stage relates the treatment or intervention to the instrument, and the second relates the outcome to the expected treatment predicted by the first stage. The average causal effect can be estimated using the difference in outcomes between the strata of the instrumental variable. D.B. Rubin in a series of papers (summarized in Angrist, Imbens, and Rubin, 1996) re-framed IVA in terms of a causal model which can be applied to binary outcome variables when the instrumental variable and treatment status are also binary. However, the average causal effect is typically expressed as a difference. When causal effects expressed as rate ratios or odds ratios are desired in nonlinear models, it is problematic to obtain the unbiased estimators for these parameters. We propose a two-stage likelihood-based IVA model. In both stages, the estimates of parameters of interest are obtained using maximum likelihood functions. In the first stage, patient compliance with the instrumental variable is estimated. Treatment effect is then imputed in the second stage with the adjustment of compliance. Essentially, the likelihood function is formulated using the joint distribution of outcome and instrumental variables by integrating out the treatment and unknown confounder, assuming the distribution of the confounder is known, and the associations between the confounder and treatment, and confounder and outcome are also known or can be estimated. This likelihood function is maximized to obtain an estimator of the coefficient of the treatment variable. The variance of this maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) of treatment effect can be estimated using average Fisher’s information matrix. We illustrate this two-stage likelihood-based IVA model using data from a study of primary androgen deprivation therapy (PADT) in men with localized prostate cancer (Lu-Yao, Albertsen, Moore, et al. 2008). We also examine the optimal minimum sample size needed for each health service area in order to reduce the misclassifications, and obtain unbiased estimates of the average causal effect.
NotePh.D.
NoteIncludes bibliographical references
Noteby Anjun Cao
Genretheses, ETD doctoral
Persistent URLhttps://doi.org/doi:10.7282/T30C4TVJ
Languageeng
CollectionGraduate School - New Brunswick Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Organization NameRutgers, The State University of New Jersey
RightsThe author owns the copyright to this work.
Version 8.5.5
Rutgers University Libraries - Copyright ©2024