Staff View
Title page of Speech of Hon. James M. Scovel, in the New Jersey Senate, on the resolutions in response to the "Governor's message on the proposed action of Congress on the air-line railroad bill."

Descriptive

Location
PhysicalLocation (authority = other); (type = text)
Rutgers University. Libraries. Special Collections and University Archives
Location
PhysicalLocation (authority = marcorg); (displayLabel = Rutgers University. Libraries. Special Collections)
Extension
DescriptiveEvent
Type
Digital exhibition
Label
All aboard! Railroads and New Jersey, 1812-1930.
AssociatedEntity
Role
curator
Name
Fowler, David J. (David Joseph)
AssociatedEntity
Role
curator
Name
Perrone, Fernanda.
AssociatedEntity
Role
project manager
Name
Radick, Caryn.
AssociatedEntity
Role
metadata contact
Name
De Fino, Melissa.
AssociatedObject
Type
Exhibition case
Relationship
Forms part of
Name
The State of Camden and Amboy
Detail
As a result of their “exclusive privileges,” the Joint Companies were an immediate financial success and the state’s coffers were filled. But at what price? As early as 1831, one newspaper feared that the legislature had created a monster that was already the “influence behind the throne, greater than the throne itself.” The deal struck with the state soon excited the jealousy of competing railroad companies, who felt that the state’s economic development was hindered. Complaints arose within New Jersey and from neighboring states that fares charged both for passengers and for freight were excessive. The Camden and Amboy was parsimonious regarding upgrades to its physical plant. Because of its reluctance to double-track its line, for instance, accidents were more common than on other railroads; in one incident, both John Quincy Adams and Cornelius Vanderbilt (who was injured) were passengers. The monopoly’s wealth, power, and influence were soon exerted in the political sphere. Its adroit machinations in the legislature caused New Jersey to gain the unsavory reputation as “the State of Camden and Amboy.” The chief strategist of the monopoly was Robert F. Stockton (1795–1866), the grandson of a signer of the Declaration of Independence. A naval officer who served in the U.S. Senate, he was ambitious, self-confident, and impulsive, but also congenial and generous. Stockton was instrumental in brokering the consolidation of the canal and railroad companies. He reputedly boasted that “he carried the State in his breeches pocket, and meant to keep it there.” Whenever the monopoly was attacked, Stockton and its other apologists invoked the sanctity of contracts, states’ rights, and the financial benefits to the state.
Matters came to a head in 1848 when a series of letters by “A Citizen of Burlington” appeared in the Burlington Gazette. In addition to reciting the usual complaints against the monopoly, the author used statistics and detailed analysis to accuse the Joint Companies of the more serious charges of gouging the public and concealing profits in their reports, thereby defrauding the state. The anonymous writer later revealed himself as the noted publisher and political economist Henry C. Carey (1793–1879). Robert F. Stockton replied to the charges on behalf of the canal and railroad companies. Two legislative commissions investigated the charges, one of which exonerated the companies, while the other found only “remissness” and “inadvertency” in bookkeeping. Even though he was castigated as a “miserable monomaniac,” Carey proceeded to pick apart the commissions’ reports in detail, and insisted upon being allowed to inspect the companies’ books. The Joint Companies ultimately refused his demand. It is perhaps a vindication of his charges that subsequently the joint board of directors ordered all the early records destroyed.
Through the vehicle of the state’s Democratic Party, in the antebellum period the Joint Companies influenced elections, often to their advantage, on the Congressional, the gubernatorial, and the local levels. They had their mouthpieces in the national and state legislatures, and controlled several newspapers. But there was also an active anti-monopoly press, including Horace Greeley’s New York Tribune. During the Civil War, the monopoly’s chokehold on through traffic drew national attention, as trains carrying troops, supplies, and mail bottlenecked in New Jersey. The Joint Companies’ (renamed the United Companies) monopoly expired in 1869, two years before the Pennsylvania Railroad leased them for 999 years. That lease by a “foreign” (i.e., out-of-state) company was also controversial, and sparked a legal challenge (John Black et al.) by the lessees’ stockholders.
AssociatedObject
Type
Exhibition caption
Detail
James Matlack Scovel, Speech of Hon. James M. Scovel, in the New Jersey Senate … on the proposed action of Congress on the air-line railroad bill (1864). Scovel excoriated “this gigantic, corrupt, and inexcusable monopoly.”
TitleInfo
Title
Title page of Speech of Hon. James M. Scovel, in the New Jersey Senate, on the resolutions in response to the "Governor's message on the proposed action of Congress on the air-line railroad bill."
RelatedItem (type = is part of)
TitleInfo
Title
Speech of Hon. James M. Scovel, in the New Jersey Senate, on the resolutions in response to the "Governor's message on the proposed action of Congress on the air-line railroad bill". Title page.
RelatedItem (type = host)
TitleInfo
Title
All aboard! Railroads and New Jersey, 1812-1930.
Identifier (type = local)
rucore00000002143
Name (type = personal)
NamePart (type = family)
Scovel
NamePart (type = given)
James M.
NamePart (type = date)
1833-1904
Description
James Matlack
DisplayForm
Scovel, James M. (James Matlack), 1833-1904.
Role
RoleTerm (authority = marcrelator); (type = text)
Author
OriginInfo
DateIssued (encoding = w3cdtf); (keyDate = yes); (qualifier = exact)
1864
TypeOfResource
StillImage
Subject (authority = LCSH)
Topic
Railroad law--New Jersey.
Identifier (type = hdl)
http://hdl.rutgers.edu/1782.1/rucore00000002143.Document.000063165
Identifier (type = doi)
doi:10.7282/T34Q7T3H
Back to the top

Rights

RightsDeclaration (AUTHORITY = RU_Archives); (ID = RU_Archives_v1)
Rutgers University owns the copyright in this work. You may make use of this resource, with proper attribution, for educational and other non-commercial uses only. Contact the Special Collections and University Archives of the Rutgers University Libraries to obtain permission for reproduction, publication, and commercial use.
Back to the top

Source

Shelving
Locator (TYPE = Call number)
HE2791.C1807 1864s
Note
SNCLY
ProvenanceEvent
Type
Exhibition
Label
All aboard! Railroads and New Jersey, 1812-1930.
Place
Special Collections and University Archives Gallery.
DateTime (encoding = iso8601); (point = start); (qualifier = exact)
2011-10-27
DateTime (encoding = iso8601); (point = end); (qualifier = exact)
2012-01-06
AssociatedEntity
Role
curator
Name
Fowler, David J. (David Joseph)
AssociatedEntity
Role
curator
Name
Perrone, Fernanda.
AssociatedObject
Type
Exhibition case
Relationship
Forms part of
Name
Case 4 : The state of Camden and Amboy.
Detail
As a result of their “exclusive privileges,” the Joint Companies were an immediate financial success and the state’s coffers were filled. But at what price? As early as 1831, one newspaper feared that the legislature had created a monster that was already the “influence behind the throne, greater than the throne itself.” The deal struck with the state soon excited the jealousy of competing railroad companies, who felt that the state’s economic development was hindered. Complaints arose within New Jersey and from neighboring states that fares charged both for passengers and for freight were excessive. The Camden and Amboy was parsimonious regarding upgrades to its physical plant. Because of its reluctance to double-track its line, for instance, accidents were more common than on other railroads; in one incident, both John Quincy Adams and Cornelius Vanderbilt (who was injured) were passengers. The monopoly’s wealth, power, and influence were soon exerted in the political sphere. Its adroit machinations in the legislature caused New Jersey to gain the unsavory reputation as “the State of Camden and Amboy.” The chief strategist of the monopoly was Robert F. Stockton (1795–1866), the grandson of a signer of the Declaration of Independence. A naval officer who served in the U.S. Senate, he was ambitious, self-confident, and impulsive, but also congenial and generous. Stockton was instrumental in brokering the consolidation of the canal and railroad companies. He reputedly boasted that “he carried the State in his breeches pocket, and meant to keep it there.” Whenever the monopoly was attacked, Stockton and its other apologists invoked the sanctity of contracts, states’ rights, and the financial benefits to the state.
Matters came to a head in 1848 when a series of letters by “A Citizen of Burlington” appeared in the Burlington Gazette. In addition to reciting the usual complaints against the monopoly, the author used statistics and detailed analysis to accuse the Joint Companies of the more serious charges of gouging the public and concealing profits in their reports, thereby defrauding the state. The anonymous writer later revealed himself as the noted publisher and political economist Henry C. Carey (1793–1879). Robert F. Stockton replied to the charges on behalf of the canal and railroad companies. Two legislative commissions investigated the charges, one of which exonerated the companies, while the other found only “remissness” and “inadvertency” in bookkeeping. Even though he was castigated as a “miserable monomaniac,” Carey proceeded to pick apart the commissions’ reports in detail, and insisted upon being allowed to inspect the companies’ books. The Joint Companies ultimately refused his demand. It is perhaps a vindication of his charges that subsequently the joint board of directors ordered all the early records destroyed.
Through the vehicle of the state’s Democratic Party, in the antebellum period the Joint Companies influenced elections, often to their advantage, on the Congressional, the gubernatorial, and the local levels. They had their mouthpieces in the national and state legislatures, and controlled several newspapers. But there was also an active anti-monopoly press, including Horace Greeley’s New York Tribune. During the Civil War, the monopoly’s chokehold on through traffic drew national attention, as trains carrying troops, supplies, and mail bottlenecked in New Jersey. The Joint Companies’ (renamed the United Companies) monopoly expired in 1869, two years before the Pennsylvania Railroad leased them for 999 years. That lease by a “foreign” (i.e., out-of-state) company was also controversial, and sparked a legal challenge (John Black et al.) by the lessees’ stockholders.
AssociatedObject
Type
Exhibition caption
Detail
James Matlack Scovel, Speech of Hon. James M. Scovel, in the New Jersey Senate … on the proposed action of Congress on the air-line railroad bill (1864).
ProvenanceEvent
Type
Related publication
Label
All aboard! Railroads and New Jersey, 1812-1930 : exhibition catalog.
DateTime (encoding = iso8601); (qualifier = exact)
2011
AssociatedEntity
Role
curator
Name
Fowler, David J. (David Joseph)
Back to the top

Technical

ContentModel
Document
DateCreated (encoding = iso8601); (qualifier = exact)
2011-09-29
OperatingSystem (VERSION = v. 105.8)
Mac OSX
BasicImageCharacteristics
ImageWidth
3215
ImageHeight
5200
Orientation
DisplayOrientation
Normal
ImageOrientation
Normal
GeneralCaptureInformation
CaptureDevice
reflection print scanner
Scanner
Manufacturer
Epson
Model (SERIALNUMBER = FVS0015678)
Expression 10000 XL
MaximumOpticalResolution
600
Software (VERSION = 3.46A (Universal))
EPSON Scan
MimeType (TYPE = file)
image/tiff
MimeType (TYPE = container)
application/x-tar
FileSize (UNIT = bytes)
50165760
Checksum (METHOD = SHA1)
76cd04bb1cffa420fd1e03cf7a8415f7cccd099c
Back to the top
Version 8.5.5
Rutgers University Libraries - Copyright ©2024