Home
Resource
What influences managers’ enactment of procedural and interactional justice towards their subordinates?
PDF
PDF format is widely accepted and good for printing.
Plug-in required
PDF-1(486.67 kb)
Citation & Export
View Usage Statistics
Staff View

Citation & Export
Hide

Simple citation

Zhao, Guozhen. What influences managers’ enactment of procedural and interactional justice towards their subordinates?. Retrieved from https://doi.org/doi:10.7282/T3FB5209

Export

Click here for information about Citation Management Tools at Rutgers.

Statistics
Hide

Description

TitleWhat influences managers’ enactment of procedural and interactional justice towards their subordinates?
NameZhao, Guozhen (author); Chen, Ya-Ru (chair); Chao, Chao C (internal member); Siegel, Phyllis (internal member); Blader, Steven (outside member); Rutgers University; Graduate School - Newark
Date Created2012
Other Date2012-01 (degree)
SubjectManagement, Labor discipline, Personnel management, Reliability
Extentvi, 131 p. : ill.
DescriptionThis dissertation carries out two studies to examine when and why managers exhibit procedural justice towards their subordinates. Subordinates seen as having more benevolence trustworthiness elicited greater procedural justice, whereas subordinates seen as having less integrity trustworthiness elicited greater procedural justice. Moreover, the positive (negative) relationship between subordinates’ benevolence (integrity) trustworthiness and managers’ procedural justice was more pronounced when subordinates were perceived as higher in ability. These findings portray a multi-functional purpose to managers’ enactment of high procedural justice: (1) when desirable, to maintain positive relationships with subordinates (e.g., if subordinates are high in benevolence), and (2) when necessary, to minimize potential disruption that subordinates may cause (e.g., if subordinates have low integrity). In addition to procedural justice, the impact of subordinates’ trustworthiness on managers’ interactional justice was also investigated in the Field Study. Implications for the organizational justice and trust literatures are discussed.
NotePh.D.
NoteIncludes bibliographical references
NoteIncludes vita
Noteby Guozhen Zhao
Genretheses, ETD doctoral
Persistent URLhttps://doi.org/doi:10.7282/T3FB5209
Languageeng
CollectionGraduate School - Newark Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Organization NameRutgers, The State University of New Jersey
RightsThe author owns the copyright to this work.
Version 8.5.1
Rutgers University Libraries - Copyright ©2023