Institutional theorists have generally focused on the role of social and cultural characteristics of the external environment that motivate and facilitate the diffusion of management innovations (MIs). However, most studies have treated innovation as a discrete phenomenon and have not examined the variability of innovation adoption over time. MI, characterized by flexibility, variability, and continuity, necessitates probing into the “Iron Cage” to describe a more complete image of institutional change. Based on insights from the behavioral theory of the firm (Cyert & March, 1963), this dissertation focuses on the dynamic process that determines organizational responses to institutional pressure. It is composed of three studies which deal with the population-level diffusion, individual-level adoption, and field-level isomorphism of MI practices respectively. The empirical setting is the adoption of alternative types of public service delivery in U.S. local governments. Information on service delivery was obtained from the International City/County Management Association’s (ICMA) surveys of local governments’ service delivery choices in 1982, 1987, 1992, 1997, 2002, and 2007. The ICMA data were supplemented by the data from censuses of governments and other sources. The primary method of implementing the New Public Management (NPM) movement has been the use of contractual or cooperative agreements between local governments and private sector businesses or non-profit organizations to deliver public services. Whereas the outsourcing of government services has its advocates and critics, this study posits that accompanying the NPM movement has been an institutional change from traditional to market-driven public management, where conflicting institutional models coexist. This dissertation hopes to make several contributions. First, it depicts how organizational heterogeneity is generated through path dependence, even in dealing with identical institutional change. Second, it provides a more dynamic process of institutional change by borrowing insights from the behavior theory of the firm (Cyert & March, 1963). Third, it offers a new approach to understanding the nature and process of institutional isomorphism. Demonstrating the impact of variability and flexibility pertaining to MI, this dissertation calls for holistic, balanced interpretations and applications of structuralistic, deterministic theories.
Subject (authority = RUETD)
Topic
Management
RelatedItem (type = host)
TitleInfo
Title
Rutgers University Electronic Theses and Dissertations
I hereby grant to the Rutgers University Libraries and to my school the non-exclusive right to archive, reproduce and distribute my thesis or dissertation, in whole or in part, and/or my abstract, in whole or in part, in and from an electronic format, subject to the release date subsequently stipulated in this submittal form and approved by my school. I represent and stipulate that the thesis or dissertation and its abstract are my original work, that they do not infringe or violate any rights of others, and that I make these grants as the sole owner of the rights to my thesis or dissertation and its abstract. I represent that I have obtained written permissions, when necessary, from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis or dissertation and will supply copies of such upon request by my school. I acknowledge that RU ETD and my school will not distribute my thesis or dissertation or its abstract if, in their reasonable judgment, they believe all such rights have not been secured. I acknowledge that I retain ownership rights to the copyright of my work. I also retain the right to use all or part of this thesis or dissertation in future works, such as articles or books.