Staff View
Colony Collapse Disorder: Links to pesticides and their alternatives

Descriptive

TypeOfResource
Text
Note (type = date)
Summer 2011
Note (type = supplementary materials)
Accompanied by video file
Subject (authority = GGREAT)
Topic
Agriculture and Farming
Subject (authority = LCSH)
Topic
Colony collapse disorder of honeybees
Subject (authority = LCSH)
Topic
Pesticides
Subject (authority = LCSH)
Topic
Honeybee
Genre (authority = GEM)
research study
Language
LanguageTerm (authority = ISO 639-3:2007); (type = text)
English
PhysicalDescription
InternetMediaType
application/pdf
Extent
13 p.
OriginInfo
DateCreated (encoding = w3cdtf); (keyDate = yes); (qualifier = exact)
2011
Name (type = corporate)
NamePart
Rutgers University
Role
RoleTerm (authority = marcrelator); (type = text)
Associated name
Extension
DescriptiveEvent
DateTime (encoding = w3cdtf); (qualifier = exact)
2011
Detail
Paper and video completed in partial requirement for the course, Colloquium: Ethics in Science and Society.
AssociatedEntity
Role
Teacher
Name
Julie M. Fagan
Affiliation
SEBS - Animal Science, Rutgers University
Type
Course
Label
Colloquium: Ethics in Science and Society
TitleInfo
Title
Colony Collapse Disorder: Links to pesticides and their alternatives
Abstract (type = abstract)
A study on pesticides that may be connected to colony collapse disorder, as well as natural alternatives that can substitute them
Abstract (type = summary)
Colony Collapse disorder (CCD) is when all the workers in a honeybee hive abandon the hive. while there is no specific cause known for CCD, there are several pressures on honeybees that are believed to come together to make it occur (Watanabe). Pesticides, one of the believed causes of CCD, are a human pressures that can be removed from the equation by current technology. Pest control has evolved from sulfur in Mesopotamia over 4,500 years ago (Miller, GT), to deadly poisons, and finally to specific toxins developed in chemistry labs. Carbamate pesticides, organochlorine insecticides, pyrethroid pesticides, Malathion, Neonicontinoids, and Carbaryl are several pesticides that have been offered for pest control with varying degrees of toxicity and specificity. In the past, these effective methods of killing pests were important for human development of civilizations, however the sterile male/insect technique (SIT), physical techniques, cultural techniques, and biological control are natural methods of pest control that do not put pressures on honeybees and are beginning to be implemented. Biological methods, perhaps the most important of alternatives, is where humans use nematodes, fungi, bacteria, viruses, and genetic manipulation as a method of pest control by supporting natural enemies of the pests in order to subdue them (Gullen). Unfortunately, in the case of both genetic manipulation and pesticides, resistance is a common occurrence where the means of pest control can become obsolete. This can occur through pest individuals learning to avoid the pest control means implemented, by the pests becoming tolerant through the more resistant (more fit) individuals surviving, through physiological changes occurring in pest individual, or through the natural biochemical detoxification of pest individuals by developing enzymes to counteract the pathogens (Gullen). With honeybees pollinating roughly twenty billion dollars worth of food crops in the United States (Hickman) alone, farmers should take into account the consequences of using pesticides that hurt the investment they are trying to protect. No progress can occur without communication between farmers and Beekeepers, as well as important research that explores natural alternatives to pesticides.
Name (type = personal)
NamePart (type = family)
Clark
NamePart (type = given)
Colin
Role
RoleTerm (authority = marcrelator); (type = text)
Author
Name (type = personal)
NamePart (type = family)
Mosebach
NamePart (type = given)
Ian
Role
RoleTerm (authority = marcrelator); (type = text)
Author
Name (type = personal)
NamePart (type = family)
Fagan
NamePart (type = given)
Julie M.
Role
RoleTerm (authority = marcrelator); (type = text)
Author
Affiliation
SEBS - Animal Science
Identifier (type = hdl)
http://hdl.rutgers.edu/1782.1/rucore00000002167.Manuscript.000066419
RelatedItem (type = host)
TitleInfo
Title
GGREAT Student Projects
Identifier (type = local)
rucore00000002167
Location
PhysicalLocation (authority = marcorg); (displayLabel = Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey)
NjNbRU
Identifier (type = doi)
doi:10.7282/T3TT4PRG
Back to the top

Rights

RightsDeclaration (AUTHORITY = GS); (ID = rulibRdec0006)
The author owns the copyright to this work
Copyright
Status
Copyright protected
Availability
Status
Open
Reason
Permission or license
RightsHolder (type = personal)
Name
FamilyName
Clark
GivenName
Colin
Role
Copyright holder
RightsHolder (type = personal)
Name
FamilyName
Mosebach
GivenName
Ian
Role
Copyright holder
RightsHolder (type = personal)
Name
FamilyName
Fagan
GivenName
Julie M.
Role
Copyright holder
Back to the top

Technical

ContentModel
Manuscript
MimeType (TYPE = file)
application/msword
MimeType (TYPE = container)
application/x-tar
FileSize (UNIT = bytes)
634880
Checksum (METHOD = SHA1)
9f5dcec95f8d1b6a566050e905a211de3cd0f219
Back to the top
Version 8.5.5
Rutgers University Libraries - Copyright ©2024