The dissertation examines the ideas, regulations, and experiences of queer sexualities in Hungary between the birth of Budapest as a unified metropolis in 1873 and Hungary’s entry into World War II in 1941. Focusing on same-sex sexuality throughout Hungary’s turbulent history provides an illuminating case study about how political conservatism and tolerance of non-normative sexualities could coexist prior to WWII. By piecing together scattered information on how regulatory bodies (police, courts, and medical establishments) and individuals negotiated sexuality throughout Hungary’s turbulent history, while simultaneously reading for historical and current silences around sexuality, the study exposes the complex interplay between the modernization efforts of Hungarian authorities, liberal ideas that equated “gay friendliness” with progress, and practical realities on the ground. I reconstruct the ambiguous legal discourse of same-sex sexuality, which criminalized male homosexuals, and, yet left a lot of room not to prosecute them. The chapters examine both discourses and lived experiences of non-normative sexualities using a wide range of sources that include: the homosexual registry of the Budapest Metropolitan police, contemporary investigative journalism reports, a lesbian scandal and legal case involving two of Hungary’s leading conservative women, the records of the 1919 Hungarian Soviet Republic Revolutionary Tribunal’s Experimental Criminology Department, and various documents from the Hungarian legal system. I argue that regardless of the varying political constellations between 1873 and 1941, authorities did not attempt to repress “respectable” homosexuals because they believed that tolerance was a means to secure Budapest’s place in the transnational Western urban community. I demonstrate that in spite of Hungary’s authoritarian conservative climate of the interwar years, the discourses, regulation, and policing of same-sex sexuality show remarkable continuities from the pre-WW I era. Using same-sex sexuality as a lens, the dissertation also illustrates that Budapest was not a cultural backwater in prewar and interwar Europe, but was in fact an important location in a European conversation about non-normative sexuality that is more commonly associated with Berlin, London or Paris. In spite of the West’s sense of “superiority” and Hungary and Eastern Europe’s keenness to “catch up,” the transmission of knowledge about sexuality and its management was not a one-way flow.
Subject (authority = RUETD)
Topic
History
RelatedItem (type = host)
TitleInfo
Title
Rutgers University Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Identifier (type = RULIB)
ETD
Identifier
ETD_4374
PhysicalDescription
Form (authority = gmd)
electronic resource
InternetMediaType
application/pdf
InternetMediaType
text/xml
Extent
vii, 381 p. : ill.
Note (type = degree)
Ph.D.
Note (type = bibliography)
Includes bibliographical references
Note (type = vita)
Includes vita
Note (type = statement of responsibility)
by Anita A. Kurimay
Subject (authority = ETD-LCSH)
Topic
Gays--Hungary--Budapest--History--19th century
Subject (authority = ETD-LCSH)
Topic
Gays--Hungary--Budapest--History--20th century
Subject (authority = ETD-LCSH)
Topic
Gays—Legal status, laws, etc.--Hungary--Budapest--History--19th century
Subject (authority = ETD-LCSH)
Topic
Gays—Legal status, laws, etc.--Hungary--Budapest--History--20th century
Subject (authority = ETD-LCSH)
Topic
Gays--Hungary--Budapest--Social life and customs--19th century
Subject (authority = ETD-LCSH)
Topic
Gays--Hungary--Budapest--Social life and customs--20th century
Rutgers University. Graduate School - New Brunswick
AssociatedObject
Type
License
Name
Author Agreement License
Detail
I hereby grant to the Rutgers University Libraries and to my school the non-exclusive right to archive, reproduce and distribute my thesis or dissertation, in whole or in part, and/or my abstract, in whole or in part, in and from an electronic format, subject to the release date subsequently stipulated in this submittal form and approved by my school. I represent and stipulate that the thesis or dissertation and its abstract are my original work, that they do not infringe or violate any rights of others, and that I make these grants as the sole owner of the rights to my thesis or dissertation and its abstract. I represent that I have obtained written permissions, when necessary, from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis or dissertation and will supply copies of such upon request by my school. I acknowledge that RU ETD and my school will not distribute my thesis or dissertation or its abstract if, in their reasonable judgment, they believe all such rights have not been secured. I acknowledge that I retain ownership rights to the copyright of my work. I also retain the right to use all or part of this thesis or dissertation in future works, such as articles or books.