Staff View
Reporters in practice

Descriptive

TitleInfo
Title
Reporters in practice
SubTitle
the role of privilege in contemporary journalism
Name (type = personal)
NamePart (type = family)
Mardenfeld
NamePart (type = given)
Sandra
DisplayForm
Sandra Mardenfeld
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
author
Name (type = personal)
NamePart (type = family)
Keith
NamePart (type = given)
Susan
DisplayForm
Susan Keith
Affiliation
Advisory Committee
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
chair
Name (type = personal)
NamePart (type = family)
Pavlik
NamePart (type = given)
John
DisplayForm
John Pavlik
Affiliation
Advisory Committee
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
internal member
Name (type = personal)
NamePart (type = family)
Kern
NamePart (type = given)
Montague
DisplayForm
Montague Kern
Affiliation
Advisory Committee
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
internal member
Name (type = personal)
NamePart (type = family)
Fowles
NamePart (type = given)
Barbara
DisplayForm
Barbara Fowles
Affiliation
Advisory Committee
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
outside member
Name (type = corporate)
NamePart
Rutgers University
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
degree grantor
Name (type = corporate)
NamePart
Graduate School - New Brunswick
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
school
TypeOfResource
Text
Genre (authority = marcgt)
theses
OriginInfo
DateCreated (qualifier = exact)
2012
DateOther (qualifier = exact); (type = degree)
2012-10
CopyrightDate (qualifier = exact)
2012
Place
PlaceTerm (type = code)
xx
Language
LanguageTerm (authority = ISO639-2b); (type = code)
eng
Subject (authority = RUETD)
Topic
Communication, Information and Library Studies
RelatedItem (type = host)
TitleInfo
Title
Rutgers University Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Identifier (type = RULIB)
ETD
Identifier
ETD_4336
PhysicalDescription
Form (authority = gmd)
electronic resource
InternetMediaType
application/pdf
InternetMediaType
text/xml
Extent
v, 263 p.
Note (type = degree)
Ph.D.
Note (type = bibliography)
Includes bibliographical references
Note (type = statement of responsibility)
by Sandra Mardenfeld
Subject (authority = ETD-LCSH)
Topic
Confidential communications--Press
Subject (authority = ETD-LCSH)
Topic
Attribution of news
Identifier (type = hdl)
http://hdl.rutgers.edu/1782.1/rucore10001600001.ETD.000066908
RelatedItem (type = host)
TitleInfo
Title
Graduate School - New Brunswick Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Identifier (type = local)
rucore19991600001
Location
PhysicalLocation (authority = marcorg); (displayLabel = Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey)
NjNbRU
Identifier (type = doi)
doi:10.7282/T30P0XSG
Genre (authority = ExL-Esploro)
ETD doctoral
Abstract
Journalists often take the position that confidential sources should remain anonymous. One tool journalists invoke when pressure is exerted by the government to reveal a source’s identity is reporters’ privilege, basing this right on the First Amendment, which protects freedom of speech and the press. Yet the interpretation of exactly what this Amendment promises is much debated.
Studies on reporter’s privilege and shield laws usually focus on three arenas: historical developments (Allen, 1992), analysis of legislation and court cases (Fargo, 2006-c; Fargo, 2002; Schmid, 2001) and whether the First Amendment promisesprivilege at all (Marcus, 1983). Little research, however, looks at reporter’s privilege and shield laws through the eyes of practitioners and whether they think the threat of source exposure corrupts the newsperson’s ability to inform the public, thus hurting free speech. Similarly, there is little research on how the mainstream news media frame reporter’s privilege and shield laws and what the public thinks of them.
The first purpose of this dissertation is to understand journalists’ perceptions of the importance of the reporter/anonymous source relationship and whether they think the threat of revealing sources alters the newsgathering process by interviewing ournalists who went to jail rather than expose their sources. The second goal is to understand how reporter’s privilege and shield laws are portrayed to the public by looking at the frames four major metro newspapers, in different geographical regions,used in their editorial pages when discussing reporter’s privilege and shield laws over the span of 38 years, starting in 1972, the year of the pivotal Supreme Court decision in Branzburg v. Hayes1. The findings may provide insight into how the media explain such issues to the public and how the media establishment can better construct their narratives to educate its audience on such concerns.
The last purpose is to suggest how the public may understand the issues of shield laws and reporter’s privilege through the media they consume. The findings from focus groups conducted with three demographic groups—students, baby boomers, and seniors—provide insight into how the public may perceive and misinterpret such issues, and how media institutions can better educate the public on shield laws and reporter’s privilege.
Back to the top

Rights

RightsDeclaration (ID = rulibRdec0006)
The author owns the copyright to this work.
RightsHolder (type = personal)
Name
FamilyName
Mardenfeld
GivenName
Sandra
Role
Copyright Holder
RightsEvent
Type
Permission or license
DateTime (encoding = w3cdtf); (qualifier = exact); (point = start)
2012-09-30 21:41:52
AssociatedEntity
Name
Sandra Mardenfeld
Role
Copyright holder
Affiliation
Rutgers University. Graduate School - New Brunswick
AssociatedObject
Type
License
Name
Author Agreement License
Detail
I hereby grant to the Rutgers University Libraries and to my school the non-exclusive right to archive, reproduce and distribute my thesis or dissertation, in whole or in part, and/or my abstract, in whole or in part, in and from an electronic format, subject to the release date subsequently stipulated in this submittal form and approved by my school. I represent and stipulate that the thesis or dissertation and its abstract are my original work, that they do not infringe or violate any rights of others, and that I make these grants as the sole owner of the rights to my thesis or dissertation and its abstract. I represent that I have obtained written permissions, when necessary, from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis or dissertation and will supply copies of such upon request by my school. I acknowledge that RU ETD and my school will not distribute my thesis or dissertation or its abstract if, in their reasonable judgment, they believe all such rights have not been secured. I acknowledge that I retain ownership rights to the copyright of my work. I also retain the right to use all or part of this thesis or dissertation in future works, such as articles or books.
Copyright
Status
Copyright protected
Availability
Status
Open
Reason
Permission or license
Back to the top

Technical

FileSize (UNIT = bytes)
2027520
OperatingSystem (VERSION = 5.1)
windows xp
ContentModel
ETD
MimeType (TYPE = file)
application/pdf
MimeType (TYPE = container)
application/x-tar
FileSize (UNIT = bytes)
2027520
Checksum (METHOD = SHA1)
f31483ab748bb9e69238a4d3a39e92b6441254cf
Back to the top
Version 8.5.5
Rutgers University Libraries - Copyright ©2024