Staff View
Do the experts lie?

Descriptive

TitleInfo
Title
Do the experts lie?
SubTitle
an examination of the impact of expertise & high status on organizational misconduct
Name (type = personal)
NamePart (type = family)
McManus
NamePart (type = given)
Joseph
NamePart (type = date)
1971-
DisplayForm
Joseph McManus
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
author
Name (type = personal)
NamePart (type = family)
Feinberg
NamePart (type = given)
Susan
DisplayForm
Susan Feinberg
Affiliation
Advisory Committee
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
chair
Name (type = personal)
NamePart (type = family)
Dougherty
NamePart (type = given)
Deborah
DisplayForm
Deborah Dougherty
Affiliation
Advisory Committee
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
internal member
Name (type = personal)
NamePart (type = family)
Warren
NamePart (type = given)
Danielle
DisplayForm
Danielle Warren
Affiliation
Advisory Committee
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
internal member
Name (type = personal)
NamePart (type = family)
SOPHER
NamePart (type = given)
BARRY
DisplayForm
BARRY SOPHER
Affiliation
Advisory Committee
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
outside member
Name (type = corporate)
NamePart
Rutgers University
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
degree grantor
Name (type = corporate)
NamePart
Graduate School - Newark
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
school
TypeOfResource
Text
Genre (authority = marcgt)
theses
OriginInfo
DateCreated (qualifier = exact)
2013
DateOther (qualifier = exact); (type = degree)
2013-01
Place
PlaceTerm (type = code)
xx
Language
LanguageTerm (authority = ISO639-2b); (type = code)
eng
Abstract (type = abstract)
My dissertation examines organizational misconduct through a process framework. I examine how individual and organizational decision processes interact to increase the potential for organizational misconduct. Individuals apply a quasi-rational assessment and initiate misconduct where the benefits of this behavior sufficiently outweigh the costs. They also utilize frames to structure their decision making. At times an ethical frame is inactive which leads to an amoral decision process that increases the probability of misconduct. Conflict management processes at the organizational level feedback on these individual decision processes to increase the probability of misconduct. Within organizational decision making, conflict must be managed. Organizations specifically limit affective conflict since it highlights value differences and personality conflicts. Ethical confrontation is a form of conflict that leads to affective conflict. As a result, ethical confrontation is disfavored and a norm of ethical conflict avoidance develops. This norm increases misconduct by lowering the subjective costs that quasi-rational decision makers perceive and through limiting ethical awareness. Decision precedents represent an additional conflict management process. Precedents permit organizations to avoid revisiting decisions and focus analysis on whether the precedent applies. This further limits the availability of an ethical frame and grows increasingly problematic as precedents are extended to new contexts. The amoral process that results increases the probability that organizational misconduct will occur. In light of these individual and organizational processes, expertise and high status also increase the probability of organizational misconduct. These attributes independently reduce the perceived costs of misconduct, enhance the power of the avoidance norm, and impact precedent use to increase the probability that misconduct will occur. I test my theory through both a computer simulation and an econometric study. In the simulation I demonstrate significant differences in the levels of misconduct consistent with my predictions. The econometric model also provides strong support for the hypothesis that status is associated with increased levels of misconduct. Finally, I examine the possible impact of partial observability within my econometric data. Using two alternate specifications (detection controlled estimation and triangulation), I demonstrate several consistent findings across these models. This reduces concerns that observability creates bias within my base model.
Subject (authority = RUETD)
Topic
Management
Subject (authority = ETD-LCSH)
Topic
Organizational behavior
Subject (authority = ETD-LCSH)
Topic
Employees--Attitudes
Subject (authority = ETD-LCSH)
Topic
Professional ethics
RelatedItem (type = host)
TitleInfo
Title
Rutgers University Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Identifier (type = RULIB)
ETD
Identifier
ETD_4508
PhysicalDescription
Form (authority = gmd)
electronic resource
InternetMediaType
application/pdf
InternetMediaType
text/xml
Extent
vi, 141 p. : ill.
Note (type = degree)
Ph.D.
Note (type = bibliography)
Includes bibliographical references
Note (type = vita)
Includes vita
Note (type = statement of responsibility)
by Joseph McManus
Identifier (type = hdl)
http://hdl.rutgers.edu/1782.1/rucore10002600001.ETD.000067610
RelatedItem (type = host)
TitleInfo
Title
Graduate School - Newark Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Identifier (type = local)
rucore10002600001
Location
PhysicalLocation (authority = marcorg); (displayLabel = Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey)
NjNbRU
Identifier (type = doi)
doi:10.7282/T30Z721P
Genre (authority = ExL-Esploro)
ETD doctoral
Back to the top

Rights

RightsDeclaration (ID = rulibRdec0006)
The author owns the copyright to this work.
RightsHolder (type = personal)
Name
FamilyName
McManus
GivenName
Joseph
Role
Copyright Holder
RightsEvent
Type
Permission or license
DateTime (encoding = w3cdtf); (qualifier = exact); (point = start)
2013-01-14 12:25:29
AssociatedEntity
Name
Joseph McManus
Role
Copyright holder
Affiliation
Rutgers University. Graduate School - Newark
AssociatedObject
Type
License
Name
Author Agreement License
Detail
I hereby grant to the Rutgers University Libraries and to my school the non-exclusive right to archive, reproduce and distribute my thesis or dissertation, in whole or in part, and/or my abstract, in whole or in part, in and from an electronic format, subject to the release date subsequently stipulated in this submittal form and approved by my school. I represent and stipulate that the thesis or dissertation and its abstract are my original work, that they do not infringe or violate any rights of others, and that I make these grants as the sole owner of the rights to my thesis or dissertation and its abstract. I represent that I have obtained written permissions, when necessary, from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis or dissertation and will supply copies of such upon request by my school. I acknowledge that RU ETD and my school will not distribute my thesis or dissertation or its abstract if, in their reasonable judgment, they believe all such rights have not been secured. I acknowledge that I retain ownership rights to the copyright of my work. I also retain the right to use all or part of this thesis or dissertation in future works, such as articles or books.
Copyright
Status
Copyright protected
Availability
Status
Open
Reason
Permission or license
Back to the top

Technical

RULTechMD (ID = TECHNICAL1)
ContentModel
ETD
OperatingSystem (VERSION = 5.1)
windows xp
Back to the top
Version 8.5.5
Rutgers University Libraries - Copyright ©2024