Innovations are expected to bring many benefits to organizations. However, unless an innovation is implemented successfully, its intended benefits will not be realized. Successful implementation requires users’ acceptance and use of the innovation adopted by the organization. Managers have been proven to be a critical factor affecting innovation implementation success; however, how managers could influence innovation implementation effectiveness has not been probed adequately in the innovation literature. This study examined the effect of influence strategies used by managers on innovation implementation effectiveness and further explored the role of innovation attributes and users’ characteristics in the influence process. Therefore, this study tried to investigate three research questions: (1) how do different influence strategies used by managers impact innovation implementation effectiveness; (2) how do users’ perceived innovation attributes affect the effectiveness of managers’ influence strategies; and (3) what is the impact of users’ characteristics on the effectiveness of influence strategies? Three hundred and one employees from two Taiwanese companies that adopted knowledge management systems (KMS) participated in this study. The results showed that the managers’ persuasive strategy was positively related to both users’ attitude toward using KMS and their actual usage, while the relationship-based strategy was negatively related to both users’ attitude and their usage. Managers’ use of the assertive strategy only resulted in users’ negative attitude toward using KMS, but had no effect on the actual usage. Both relative advantage and complexity mediated the relationship between influence strategies and innovation implementation effectiveness. Users’ intrinsic motivation resulted in users’ positive attitude, but had an effect on users’ usage. Users’ extrinsic motivation had no effects in prediction either users’ attitude or usage. Users’ power distance orientation had no effect on either users’ attitude or users’ usage, but positively moderated the relationship between influence strategies and users’ usage.
Subject (authority = RUETD)
Topic
Management
Subject (authority = ETD-LCSH)
Topic
Industrial productivity--Effect of technological innovations on
Subject (authority = ETD-LCSH)
Topic
Executives--Attitudes
Subject (authority = ETD-LCSH)
Topic
Management
RelatedItem (type = host)
TitleInfo
Title
Rutgers University Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Identifier (type = RULIB)
ETD
RelatedItem (type = host)
TitleInfo
Title
Graduate School - Newark Electronic Theses and Dissertations
I hereby grant to the Rutgers University Libraries and to my school the non-exclusive right to archive, reproduce and distribute my thesis or dissertation, in whole or in part, and/or my abstract, in whole or in part, in and from an electronic format, subject to the release date subsequently stipulated in this submittal form and approved by my school. I represent and stipulate that the thesis or dissertation and its abstract are my original work, that they do not infringe or violate any rights of others, and that I make these grants as the sole owner of the rights to my thesis or dissertation and its abstract. I represent that I have obtained written permissions, when necessary, from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis or dissertation and will supply copies of such upon request by my school. I acknowledge that RU ETD and my school will not distribute my thesis or dissertation or its abstract if, in their reasonable judgment, they believe all such rights have not been secured. I acknowledge that I retain ownership rights to the copyright of my work. I also retain the right to use all or part of this thesis or dissertation in future works, such as articles or books.