Staff View
Deciding to blow the whistle

Descriptive

TitleInfo
Title
Deciding to blow the whistle
SubTitle
how individual and organizational factors influence the reporting of wrongdoing In the federal government
Name (type = personal)
NamePart (type = family)
Lavena
NamePart (type = given)
Cecilia Florencia
NamePart (type = date)
1976-
DisplayForm
Cecilia Lavena
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
author
Name (type = personal)
NamePart (type = family)
Van Ryzin
NamePart (type = given)
Gregg G.
DisplayForm
Gregg G. Van Ryzin
Affiliation
Advisory Committee
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
chair
Name (type = personal)
NamePart (type = family)
Riccucci
NamePart (type = given)
Norma M.
DisplayForm
Norma M. Riccucci
Affiliation
Advisory Committee
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
internal member
Name (type = personal)
NamePart (type = family)
Piotrowski
NamePart (type = given)
Suzanne J.
DisplayForm
Suzanne J. Piotrowski
Affiliation
Advisory Committee
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
internal member
Name (type = personal)
NamePart (type = family)
Hull
NamePart (type = given)
Elizabeth
DisplayForm
Elizabeth Hull
Affiliation
Advisory Committee
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
outside member
Name (type = corporate)
NamePart
Rutgers University
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
degree grantor
Name (type = corporate)
NamePart
Graduate School - Newark
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
school
TypeOfResource
Text
Genre (authority = marcgt)
theses
OriginInfo
DateCreated (qualifier = exact)
2013
DateOther (qualifier = exact); (type = degree)
2013-05
Place
PlaceTerm (type = code)
xx
Language
LanguageTerm (authority = ISO639-2b); (type = code)
eng
Abstract (type = abstract)
The act of blowing the whistle on wrongdoing is essential to good government, yet it poses an ethical dilemma to the individual, the organization and society. Using a mixed methods approach, the aim of this dissertation is to examine the individual and organizational factors that facilitate or impede whistleblowing in the US federal government. A logistic regression analysis of survey data collected by the Merit Systems Protection Board, covering 36,926 federal employees from 24 agencies, is employed to examine various individual and organizational factors empirically. In addition, qualitative data from 18 original in-depth interviews with federal whistleblowers were gathered to provide a better understanding of the influences involved in the decision about whether or not to blow the whistle. Findings from the quantitative analysis suggest that, although whistleblowing is a rare event within most federal agencies, its likelihood is positively associated with norm-based and affective work motives, but negatively associated with job satisfaction and several key indicators of organizational culture, including perceptions of respect and openness, cooperativeness and flexibility in the work setting, and fair treatment and trust in the supervisor. The qualitative interview findings revealed similar themes but also suggested additional, more detailed explanations of why public employees blow the whistle in the federal government. Specifically, when asked about the factors associated with their whistleblowing, interviewees frequently mentioned intrinsic individual motives linked to their personal upbringing and values and their commitment to serving the larger public. They also pointed to the existence of a maladapted and unethical work environment that ignored or covered up wrongdoing and threatened to punish whistleblowers. This indicates intrinsic individual motives, particularly those associated with norm-based and affective work motivations, along with perceptions of the existence of an unethical work environment and organizational culture, should be taken into account when developing and sustaining policies to promote ethical behavior and responsible public service in the federal government.
Subject (authority = RUETD)
Topic
Public Administration (SPAA)
RelatedItem (type = host)
TitleInfo
Title
Rutgers University Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Identifier (type = RULIB)
ETD
Identifier
ETD_4730
PhysicalDescription
Form (authority = gmd)
electronic resource
InternetMediaType
application/pdf
InternetMediaType
text/xml
Extent
viii, 281 p. : ill.
Note (type = degree)
Ph.D.
Note (type = bibliography)
Includes bibliographical references
Note (type = vita)
Includes vita
Note (type = statement of responsibility)
by Cecilia Florencia Lavena
Subject (authority = ETD-LCSH)
Topic
Whistle blowing
Subject (authority = ETD-LCSH)
Topic
Government accountability
Identifier (type = hdl)
http://hdl.rutgers.edu/1782.1/rucore10002600001.ETD.000068719
RelatedItem (type = host)
TitleInfo
Title
Graduate School - Newark Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Identifier (type = local)
rucore10002600001
Location
PhysicalLocation (authority = marcorg); (displayLabel = Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey)
NjNbRU
Identifier (type = doi)
doi:10.7282/T3V123C4
Genre (authority = ExL-Esploro)
ETD doctoral
Back to the top

Rights

RightsDeclaration (ID = rulibRdec0006)
The author owns the copyright to this work.
RightsHolder (type = personal)
Name
FamilyName
Lavena
GivenName
Cecilia
Role
Copyright Holder
RightsEvent
Type
Permission or license
DateTime (encoding = w3cdtf); (qualifier = exact); (point = start)
2013-04-19 13:17:16
AssociatedEntity
Name
Cecilia Lavena
Role
Copyright holder
Affiliation
Rutgers University. Graduate School - Newark
AssociatedObject
Type
License
Name
Author Agreement License
Detail
I hereby grant to the Rutgers University Libraries and to my school the non-exclusive right to archive, reproduce and distribute my thesis or dissertation, in whole or in part, and/or my abstract, in whole or in part, in and from an electronic format, subject to the release date subsequently stipulated in this submittal form and approved by my school. I represent and stipulate that the thesis or dissertation and its abstract are my original work, that they do not infringe or violate any rights of others, and that I make these grants as the sole owner of the rights to my thesis or dissertation and its abstract. I represent that I have obtained written permissions, when necessary, from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis or dissertation and will supply copies of such upon request by my school. I acknowledge that RU ETD and my school will not distribute my thesis or dissertation or its abstract if, in their reasonable judgment, they believe all such rights have not been secured. I acknowledge that I retain ownership rights to the copyright of my work. I also retain the right to use all or part of this thesis or dissertation in future works, such as articles or books.
Copyright
Status
Copyright protected
Availability
Status
Open
Reason
Permission or license
Back to the top

Technical

RULTechMD (ID = TECHNICAL1)
ContentModel
ETD
OperatingSystem (VERSION = 5.1)
windows xp
Back to the top
Version 8.5.5
Rutgers University Libraries - Copyright ©2024