DescriptionThis paper aims to contribute to the debate on the status of inflectional paradigms in grammatical theory, with special reference to the theory of Optimal Paradigms (OP, McCarthy 2005), a particular version of Paradigm Uniformity. OP proposes that certain systematic phonological differences between nouns and verbs should be analyzed as arising from contingent facts about the individual affixes making up the nominal and verbal inflectional paradigms. I argue here that the Arabic data presented in OP does not support the OP model (as against, for example, cyclic alternatives) and that consideration of similar phenomena in Itelmen, a language with richer inflectional paradigms, suggests that it is morpho-syntactic category and not paradigm properties, that determine phonological behaviour.
NoteThis is a revised version of the paper presented at the MIT Paradigms Workshop 2004.
NoteBobaljik, J.D. (2008). Paradigms (Optimal and Otherwise): A case for scepticism. In A. Bachrach & A.I. Nevins (Eds.), Inflectional Identity. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
NotePortions of the research reported in this paper have been supported by grants from FCAR (2002-NC-75019) and SSHRC (410-2002-0581).
Organization NameRutgers, The State University of New Jersey
RightsCopyright for scholarly resources published in RUcore is retained by the copyright holder. By virtue of its appearance in this open access medium, you are free to use this resource, with proper attribution, in educational and other non-commercial settings. Other uses, such as reproduction or republication, may require the permission of the copyright holder.