DescriptionIn this dissertation, I develop a model of ethical decision making in organizations that integrates research in behavioral ethics with more recent research in psychology - research that suggests that unethical decision making is more automatic than controlled, more reflexive than reflective, and more unconscious than conscious. Through this model, I propose that organizational members respond to ethical dilemmas with cognitions determined foremost by their implicit beliefs in the morality of business or moral intuition. Further, I propose that these implicit beliefs in the morality of business interact with individual and contextual factors to influence unethical decision making in organizations. This dissertation includes a pilot study and three experimental studies. The purpose of the Pilot Study was to confirm the effectiveness of the manipulation in the experimental studies; the purpose of the experimental studies (Experiments 1, 2, and 3) was to explore the hypotheses developed in the theoretical model. The results of the Pilot Study confirmed the effectiveness of the manipulation. However, the results of Experiment 1 and Experiment 2 did not provide support for the hypotheses. In Experiment 3, the results provided partial support and indicated that implicit beliefs in the morality of business influence earlier stages of the unethical decision making process: immoral judgment and immoral intent. This dissertation concludes with a discussion on the theoretical model and results. In the discussion, I note the insights that this dissertation offers into behavioral ethics research and the ethical decision making process. Further, I discuss the possible reasons for the lack of consistent results across experiments, the limitations of the studies, and the many opportunities for future research in the ethical impulse and calculus perspectives.