Social Psychological research generally concludes that political ideology is an outcome variable, dependent on our underlying psychological motivations. In the following paper, I propose a model of political ideology as moral vigilance – a general preparedness to detect moral transgressions of the values one highly emphasizes. This perspective integrates Moral Foundations Theory with Error Management Theory and is developed and tested in two studies. Study 1 replicates and extends research indicating that the Moral Foundations predict a wide variety of social and political attitudes, over and above demographic and cognitive flexibility variables. In particular, the Moral Foundations of Sanctity, Fairness, and Liberty appear to underlie many social and political attitudes within the United States. In Study 2 two statements, one ambiguously prejudiced statement and one ambiguously unpatriotic statement, made by an unknown individual in a television interview were presented. Two patterns of results emerged. First, those who placed a high emphasis on Loyalty found both statements offensive and desired greater social distance from the speaker. Second, those who placed a high emphasis on Fairness (Liberty) appeared to infer similarity with the person who made the ambiguously unpatriotic (prejudiced) comment and reported the speaker was educated, in effect granting the speaker psychological standing for their position.
Subject (authority = RUETD)
Topic
Psychology
Subject (authority = ETD-LCSH)
Topic
Ideology--Political aspects
Subject (authority = ETD-LCSH)
Topic
Ideology--Political aspects--United States
Subject (authority = ETD-LCSH)
Topic
Political ethics
RelatedItem (type = host)
TitleInfo
Title
Rutgers University Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Identifier (type = RULIB)
ETD
Identifier
ETD_5133
PhysicalDescription
Form (authority = gmd)
electronic resource
InternetMediaType
application/pdf
InternetMediaType
text/xml
Extent
vi, 183 p. : ill.
Note (type = degree)
Ph.D.
Note (type = bibliography)
Includes bibliographical references
Note (type = statement of responsibility)
by Sean T. Stevens
Subject (authority = ETD-LCSH)
Topic
Vigilance (Psychology)
RelatedItem (type = host)
TitleInfo
Title
Graduate School - New Brunswick Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Identifier (type = local)
rucore19991600001
Location
PhysicalLocation (authority = marcorg); (displayLabel = Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey)
Rutgers University. Graduate School - New Brunswick
AssociatedObject
Type
License
Name
Author Agreement License
Detail
I hereby grant to the Rutgers University Libraries and to my school the non-exclusive right to archive, reproduce and distribute my thesis or dissertation, in whole or in part, and/or my abstract, in whole or in part, in and from an electronic format, subject to the release date subsequently stipulated in this submittal form and approved by my school. I represent and stipulate that the thesis or dissertation and its abstract are my original work, that they do not infringe or violate any rights of others, and that I make these grants as the sole owner of the rights to my thesis or dissertation and its abstract. I represent that I have obtained written permissions, when necessary, from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis or dissertation and will supply copies of such upon request by my school. I acknowledge that RU ETD and my school will not distribute my thesis or dissertation or its abstract if, in their reasonable judgment, they believe all such rights have not been secured. I acknowledge that I retain ownership rights to the copyright of my work. I also retain the right to use all or part of this thesis or dissertation in future works, such as articles or books.