Sexual offending is considered to be one of the most heinous of criminal acts, and countless researchers have generated theories to account for the etiology of sex offending in the hopes of differentiating those who exhibit sexual deviancy from those who do not. Typically, these etiological theories fall into one of the following groups: psychodynamic, attachment, behavioral and cognitive-behavioral, biological, and psychosocial theories. Although informative, the theories that encompass these groupings are individual theories and typically non-inclusive of the others. As such, they are rarely sufficient to predict the occurrence of sexual offending outside of the context of one specific construct or trajectory. Integrative theories of sexual offending, on the other hand, take a wide-reaching and inclusive approach in the etiology of sexual behaviors. Two such theories are Ward and Beech’s (2008) Integrated Theory of Sex Offending (ITSO) and Thakker and Ward’s (2012) integrated framework for sexual reoffending. Unlike other theories, these two frameworks include a provision for sexual reoffending, though there is a lack of empirical tests of these theories, and integrative frameworks more generally, to date. Given the amount of attention that sexual offending and recidivism garners, an examination of such frameworks is warranted. Using a sample of adult male sex offenders released from New Jersey correctional facilities, the present dissertation study explored the prediction of an initial sex offense, as well as a sexual reoffense, within an integrative framework. The present study also examined the factors and temporal pathways involved in the prediction of non-sex recidivism. Exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, and structural equation modeling analysis were utilized. The results of the analyses provide limited support for the usefulness and real-world application of broad and comprehensive integrative theoretical frameworks in the prediction of sex offending and reoffending. However, integrative frameworks may have increased utility in the prediction of non-sex recidivism. The research implications of these findings and the directions for future research are discussed.
Subject (authority = RUETD)
Topic
Criminal Justice
RelatedItem (type = host)
TitleInfo
Title
Rutgers University Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Identifier (type = RULIB)
ETD
Identifier
ETD_5579
PhysicalDescription
Form (authority = gmd)
electronic resource
InternetMediaType
application/pdf
InternetMediaType
text/xml
Extent
vii, 124 p. : ill.
Note (type = degree)
Ph.D.
Note (type = bibliography)
Includes bibliographical references
Note (type = vita)
Includes vita
Note (type = statement of responsibility)
by Laura M. Salerno
Subject (authority = ETD-LCSH)
Topic
Sex crimes
Subject (authority = ETD-LCSH)
Topic
Sex offenders--Psychology
Subject (authority = ETD-LCSH)
Topic
Criminal behavior, Prediction of
RelatedItem (type = host)
TitleInfo
Title
Graduate School - Newark Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Identifier (type = local)
rucore10002600001
Location
PhysicalLocation (authority = marcorg); (displayLabel = Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey)
I hereby grant to the Rutgers University Libraries and to my school the non-exclusive right to archive, reproduce and distribute my thesis or dissertation, in whole or in part, and/or my abstract, in whole or in part, in and from an electronic format, subject to the release date subsequently stipulated in this submittal form and approved by my school. I represent and stipulate that the thesis or dissertation and its abstract are my original work, that they do not infringe or violate any rights of others, and that I make these grants as the sole owner of the rights to my thesis or dissertation and its abstract. I represent that I have obtained written permissions, when necessary, from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis or dissertation and will supply copies of such upon request by my school. I acknowledge that RU ETD and my school will not distribute my thesis or dissertation or its abstract if, in their reasonable judgment, they believe all such rights have not been secured. I acknowledge that I retain ownership rights to the copyright of my work. I also retain the right to use all or part of this thesis or dissertation in future works, such as articles or books.