Over the last forty years, victims have gained access to every stage of the criminal justice process including parole decision-making. In 44 states, victims are notified when their offenders are considered for parole release and may provide input requesting that it be granted or denied. Though many states’ parole boards are required to solicit input from registered victims, oftentimes the authorizing statutes do not provide instruction on how parole boards should use input. Relatedly, parole boards receive non-victim input from family and friends of victims and offenders. All input providers expect their input matters. However, research about the effects of input on release decisions has been mixed. Parole boards are therefore placed in a precarious position. Input may or may not align with their mandate to make objective release decisions considering offenders’ risk to public safety. Should parole boards’ decisions differ from input they risk legitimacy in the eyes of constituents, particularly, politically influential victims and their advocates. In order to maintain perceptions of procedural justice, and retain legitimacy, parole boards should identify the value of victim-and non-victim input and be transparent about their decision-making process. This dissertation research provides the foundation for that important work by expanding the literature about the contents of input through an exploratory analysis of a representative sample of input submitted to the New Jersey State Parole Board. The research draws on 198 unique pieces of victim and non-victim input submitted to the NJSPB on behalf of 75 offenders who received first-time parole consideration in 2004. A content analysis, guided by a grounded theory methodological approach, uncovered 12 common themes in input as well as divergent ways in which victim-interested and offender-interested input providers operationalized them. Conjunctive analysis revealed little variation in the relative importance of each theme to release decisions. Additionally, only a minority of input addressed factors that the NJSPB considers when making release decisions. Parole boards and policy makers may use these results to reconsider the way input is used in order to set and meet their constituents’ expectations which will in turn, sustain parole board legitimacy.
Subject (authority = RUETD)
Topic
Criminal Justice
RelatedItem (type = host)
TitleInfo
Title
Rutgers University Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Identifier (type = RULIB)
ETD
Identifier
ETD_5529
PhysicalDescription
Form (authority = gmd)
electronic resource
InternetMediaType
application/pdf
InternetMediaType
text/xml
Extent
ix, 197 p. : ill.
Note (type = degree)
Ph.D.
Note (type = bibliography)
Includes bibliographical references
Note (type = vita)
Includes vita
Note (type = statement of responsibility)
by Heather Robyn Tubman-Carbone
Subject (authority = ETD-LCSH)
Topic
Parole boards--New Jersey
Subject (authority = ETD-LCSH)
Topic
Parole--New Jersey
Subject (authority = ETD-LCSH)
Topic
Victims of crimes--Legal status, laws, etc.--New Jersey
RelatedItem (type = host)
TitleInfo
Title
Graduate School - Newark Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Identifier (type = local)
rucore10002600001
Location
PhysicalLocation (authority = marcorg); (displayLabel = Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey)
I hereby grant to the Rutgers University Libraries and to my school the non-exclusive right to archive, reproduce and distribute my thesis or dissertation, in whole or in part, and/or my abstract, in whole or in part, in and from an electronic format, subject to the release date subsequently stipulated in this submittal form and approved by my school. I represent and stipulate that the thesis or dissertation and its abstract are my original work, that they do not infringe or violate any rights of others, and that I make these grants as the sole owner of the rights to my thesis or dissertation and its abstract. I represent that I have obtained written permissions, when necessary, from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis or dissertation and will supply copies of such upon request by my school. I acknowledge that RU ETD and my school will not distribute my thesis or dissertation or its abstract if, in their reasonable judgment, they believe all such rights have not been secured. I acknowledge that I retain ownership rights to the copyright of my work. I also retain the right to use all or part of this thesis or dissertation in future works, such as articles or books.