Influence of odor intensity and mood on hedonic reactions to aroma compounds in a multi-ethnic sample of young adults
Citation & Export
Hide
Simple citation
Jin, Lumeng.
Influence of odor intensity and mood on hedonic reactions to aroma compounds in a multi-ethnic sample of young adults. Retrieved from
https://doi.org/doi:10.7282/T3WH2RQMExport
Description
TitleInfluence of odor intensity and mood on hedonic reactions to aroma compounds in a multi-ethnic sample of young adults
Date Created2015
Other Date2015-01 (degree)
Extent1 online resource (x, 94 p. : ill.)
DescriptionThis study was designed to investigate: 1) how nasal irritation influences the sensory perception of aromas; 2) the role of emotions in the preference and acceptance of aroma compounds; and 3) if ethnicity and genetic variation in taste sensitivity to the bitter compound 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) influence these outcomes. Ninety-six subjects (East Asian, n=53 and American Caucasians, n=43) were classified as PROP super-tasters; medium-tasters; and non-tasters. Subjects sniffed (orthonasally) aqueous solutions of cinnamaldehyde, methyl cinnamate, citral, citronellol, geraniol, and phenyl ethyl alcohol (PEA) at low (range =1-2.5 ppm) and mid-range (range =4-100ppm) concentrations in two separate sessions. Subjects rated intensity and overall liking for each aroma using 15-cm line scales. Pungency was rated for the mid-range concentrations only. Self-reported mood reactions to all aromas were collected using 8-point VAS scales. Additionally, subjects selected the most related mood descriptor of each aroma as an implicit measurement. Data were analyzed using ANOVA, multiple linear regression, and principal component analysis (PCA). Nasal pungency contributed to intensity perception, however, pungency and intensity did not influence aroma liking. Liking of cinnamaldehyde and citral increased with increasing concentration (p=0.05-0.003), but concentration did not influence liking of the other aromas. At mid-range concentration, East Asians liked cinnamaldehyde less than American Caucasians. PROP did not influence liking alone, however, East Asian subjects liked cinnamaldehyde less with increasing sensitivity to PROP, as expected. Positive mood (the mean of happy and excited VAS ratings) was associated with greater liking of most of the samples (p<0.002 for all). In multiple regression, positive mood predicted liking of cinnamaldehyde, methyl cinnamate, citral, and PEA at both concentrations (R2=0.27-0.45, p<0.0001 for all). PCA characterized the aromas by associating each with the sensory properties and mood(s) it elicited: PEA was associated with calm/relaxed mood and methyl cinnamate with negative moods (especially anxious/worried) at both concentrations; the most pungent aroma, cinnamaldehyde, was associated with exciting/energized at mid-range concentration. These data suggest that aromas eliciting positive moods were liked better. Also, differences in liking of cinnamaldehyde between ethnic groups could reflect cultural and PROP-related variability in the pleasantness of this aroma.
NoteM.S.
NoteIncludes bibliographical references
Noteby Lumeng Jin
Genretheses, ETD graduate
Languageeng
CollectionGraduate School - New Brunswick Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Organization NameRutgers, The State University of New Jersey
RightsThe author owns the copyright to this work.
Statistical Profile