Home
Resource
The future of clinical education
PDF
PDF format is widely accepted and good for printing.
Plug-in required
PDF-1(21.83 MB)
Citation & Export
View Usage Statistics
Staff View

Citation & Export
Hide

Simple citation

Romig, Barbara D.. The future of clinical education. Retrieved from https://doi.org/doi:10.7282/T3086758

Export

Click here for information about Citation Management Tools at Rutgers.

Statistics
Hide

Description

TitleThe future of clinical education
NameRomig, Barbara D. (author); O'Sullivan Maillet, Julie (chair); Tucker, Ann W (internal member); Hewitt, Anne M (outside member); Rutgers University; School of Health Professions
Date Created2015
Other Date2015-05 (degree)
SubjectHealth Sciences, Paramedical education, Clinical medicine--Study and teaching
Extent1 online resource (ii, 806 p. : ill.)
DescriptionThis research used a three-round Delphi technique to attain agreement on the purposes of clinical education, the key opportunities and challenges impacting clinical education, and the future (2018-2023) of clinical education. The Delphi panel consisted of 61 deans whose institution was a 2013 member of the Association of School of Allied Health Professions. Over eight months, from July 2013 to February 2014 and through 3 rounds, the AH deans expressed opinions about clinical education and its future. High agreement was achieved on the purposes of clinical education resulting in a comprehensive definition and goals of clinical education. For each Delphi round, AH dean responses were collected, coded, and analyzed; items were accepted as key factors, re-rated until agreement was achieved, or the study concluded. Agreement was achieved on key factors that could be identified as opportunities (n = 107) or challenges (n = 52) for AH clinical education. The Delphi research supported the clinical education categories identified in the Key Factors Impacting Clinical Education conceptual model (O’Sullivan Maillet & Romig, 2011-2013, p.105). Based on the results, an additional clinical education category of Population Health was added to the model and explicitly added in Clinical Education Models and AH deans. The AH deans categorized the key factors they could impact individually and/or collectively. The relationship the most realistic and most preferred case scenarios had on the key factors provided a deeper analysis into the future. Further prioritization of the key factors is the suggested next step.
NotePh.D.
NoteIncludes bibliographical references
Noteby Barbara D. Romig
Genretheses, ETD doctoral
Persistent URLhttps://doi.org/doi:10.7282/T3086758
Languageeng
CollectionSchool of Health Professions ETD Collection
Organization NameRutgers, The State University of New Jersey
RightsThe author owns the copyright to this work.
Version 8.5.1
Rutgers University Libraries - Copyright ©2023