One of the most significant questions about the nature of brain function is the extent to which brain networks are functionally constrained in terms of the task contexts in which they respond, versus whether their function is highly flexible across contexts (McIntosh, 2000). Thanks to decades of animal and human research, one of the most well defined networks in the brain is the corticostriatal circuit. The finding that dopamine neurons in this circuit respond to mismatches between expectations and outcomes in choice tasks according to a reinforcement learning (RL) algorithm (Shultz, 1997) helped orient the field of decision neuroscience towards studying RL type responses in the brain. Nearly all of these kinds of studies necessite choice tasks with concrete outcomes, in which subjects do something and get something, in order to have both expectation and outcome terms for RL modeling. However, far less attention has been paid to choice contexts that are abstract, that is, there are no expectations or outcomes. Additionally, most reward stimuli used to test decision making response are constrained by low dimensionality. This approach has left open several key questions about how the brain responds to abstract, multidimensional choices, and whether this response is modulated by factors such as choice context, subjective value, stimulus valence, and stimulus attributes in a manner that is the same or different from the well characterized response to these factors in concrete contexts. In a series of studies, this dissertation addresses the following unresolved questions: Study 1: How do brain regions associated with reward (e.g. striatum) and value (e.g. prefrontal cortex) respond when people choose amongst stimuli that are abstract and multidimensional? Study 2: How is this response affected by changes in choice context and stimulus valence? Study 3: How do value signals in the brain influence similarity coding of abstract reinforcers?
Subject (authority = RUETD)
Topic
Psychology
Subject (authority = ETD-LCSH)
Topic
Decision making
RelatedItem (type = host)
TitleInfo
Title
Rutgers University Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Identifier (type = RULIB)
ETD
Identifier
ETD_6577
PhysicalDescription
Form (authority = gmd)
electronic resource
InternetMediaType
application/pdf
InternetMediaType
text/xml
Extent
1 online resource (ii, 135 p. : ill.)
Note (type = degree)
Ph.D.
Note (type = bibliography)
Includes bibliographical references
Note (type = statement of responsibility)
by Colleen Mills-Finnerty
RelatedItem (type = host)
TitleInfo
Title
Graduate School - Newark Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Identifier (type = local)
rucore10002600001
Location
PhysicalLocation (authority = marcorg); (displayLabel = Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey)
I hereby grant to the Rutgers University Libraries and to my school the non-exclusive right to archive, reproduce and distribute my thesis or dissertation, in whole or in part, and/or my abstract, in whole or in part, in and from an electronic format, subject to the release date subsequently stipulated in this submittal form and approved by my school. I represent and stipulate that the thesis or dissertation and its abstract are my original work, that they do not infringe or violate any rights of others, and that I make these grants as the sole owner of the rights to my thesis or dissertation and its abstract. I represent that I have obtained written permissions, when necessary, from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis or dissertation and will supply copies of such upon request by my school. I acknowledge that RU ETD and my school will not distribute my thesis or dissertation or its abstract if, in their reasonable judgment, they believe all such rights have not been secured. I acknowledge that I retain ownership rights to the copyright of my work. I also retain the right to use all or part of this thesis or dissertation in future works, such as articles or books.