Staff View
How do species abundance distributions influence plant-pollinator networks?

Descriptive

TitleInfo
Title
How do species abundance distributions influence plant-pollinator networks?
Name (type = personal)
NamePart (type = family)
MacLeod
NamePart (type = given)
Molly
NamePart (type = date)
1985-
DisplayForm
Molly MacLeod
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
author
Name (type = personal)
NamePart (type = family)
Winfree
NamePart (type = given)
Rachael
DisplayForm
Rachael Winfree
Affiliation
Advisory Committee
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
chair
Name (type = personal)
NamePart (type = family)
Morin
NamePart (type = given)
Peter
DisplayForm
Peter Morin
Affiliation
Advisory Committee
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
internal member
Name (type = personal)
NamePart (type = family)
Lockwood
NamePart (type = given)
Julie
DisplayForm
Julie Lockwood
Affiliation
Advisory Committee
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
internal member
Name (type = personal)
NamePart (type = family)
Bartomeus
NamePart (type = given)
Ignasi
DisplayForm
Ignasi Bartomeus
Affiliation
Advisory Committee
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
outside member
Name (type = corporate)
NamePart
Rutgers University
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
degree grantor
Name (type = corporate)
NamePart
Graduate School - New Brunswick
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
school
TypeOfResource
Text
Genre (authority = marcgt)
theses
OriginInfo
DateCreated (encoding = w3cdtf); (qualifier = exact)
2016
DateOther (qualifier = exact); (type = degree)
2016-01
CopyrightDate (encoding = w3cdtf); (qualifier = exact)
2016
Place
PlaceTerm (type = code)
xx
Language
LanguageTerm (authority = ISO639-2b); (type = code)
eng
Abstract (type = abstract)
Plant – pollinator networks provide a tool for understanding patterns in ecological communities. However, apparent network patterns observed in real-world systems may be influenced by a skewed species abundance distribution (SAD), which obscures the differences between biology- and chance-based drivers of network patterns. This dissertation addresses that issue using a four-year experimental network in which the relative abundance of 17 plant species is even, and from which 8,054 specimens of 104 bee species were collected. Patterns observed in that even-SAD field experiment were compared with null models, to answer the following questions: (1) Can the apparent nested pattern of plant – pollinator networks inform pollinator conservation? (2) Does the number of plant species partners and the number of plant individual partners equally influence the effect of losing plant species from networks, and does this depend on the plant SAD? (3) Is apparent year-to-year variation in interactions driven by biology or by chance, and does this depend on the bee species abundance? This research shows that (1) the abundance of rare and common bee species were uncorrelated across plant species, suggesting that their divergent preferences would require a targeted, not a general, choice of plant species for conservation. However, their preferences were positively correlated when the even plant SAD data were subsampled to simulate a skewed plant SAD network, but only when the most attractive plant species was simulated to be the most abundant. (2) Plant species’ differential importance in the process of network disassembly is driven more by number of partner species than partner individuals, but only when the plant SAD is even. Almost no difference between species- and individual- based plant species loss was observed in the skewed network, because subsampling to skew the SAD removed many rare species and caused partner species and individuals to become more tightly correlated. (3) Expected annual dissimilarity in bee species’ preferences decreases with bee abundance, suggesting an increased ability to detect non- random changes for common bees. The common bees differed significantly from that null expectation, suggesting that variation driven by biology, not by chance, is only detectable for common species.
Subject (authority = RUETD)
Topic
Ecology and Evolution
RelatedItem (type = host)
TitleInfo
Title
Rutgers University Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Identifier (type = RULIB)
ETD
Identifier
ETD_6873
PhysicalDescription
Form (authority = gmd)
electronic resource
InternetMediaType
application/pdf
InternetMediaType
text/xml
Extent
1 online resource (vii, 87 p. : ill.)
Note (type = degree)
Ph.D.
Note (type = bibliography)
Includes bibliographical references
Subject (authority = ETD-LCSH)
Topic
Pollinators
Note (type = statement of responsibility)
by Molly MacLeod
RelatedItem (type = host)
TitleInfo
Title
Graduate School - New Brunswick Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Identifier (type = local)
rucore19991600001
Location
PhysicalLocation (authority = marcorg); (displayLabel = Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey)
NjNbRU
Identifier (type = doi)
doi:10.7282/T3M047HT
Genre (authority = ExL-Esploro)
ETD doctoral
Back to the top

Rights

RightsDeclaration (ID = rulibRdec0006)
The author owns the copyright to this work.
RightsHolder (type = personal)
Name
FamilyName
MacLeod
GivenName
Molly
Role
Copyright Holder
RightsEvent
Type
Permission or license
DateTime (encoding = w3cdtf); (qualifier = exact); (point = start)
2015-10-28 16:52:35
AssociatedEntity
Name
Molly MacLeod
Role
Copyright holder
Affiliation
Rutgers University. Graduate School - New Brunswick
AssociatedObject
Type
License
Name
Author Agreement License
Detail
I hereby grant to the Rutgers University Libraries and to my school the non-exclusive right to archive, reproduce and distribute my thesis or dissertation, in whole or in part, and/or my abstract, in whole or in part, in and from an electronic format, subject to the release date subsequently stipulated in this submittal form and approved by my school. I represent and stipulate that the thesis or dissertation and its abstract are my original work, that they do not infringe or violate any rights of others, and that I make these grants as the sole owner of the rights to my thesis or dissertation and its abstract. I represent that I have obtained written permissions, when necessary, from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis or dissertation and will supply copies of such upon request by my school. I acknowledge that RU ETD and my school will not distribute my thesis or dissertation or its abstract if, in their reasonable judgment, they believe all such rights have not been secured. I acknowledge that I retain ownership rights to the copyright of my work. I also retain the right to use all or part of this thesis or dissertation in future works, such as articles or books.
Copyright
Status
Copyright protected
Availability
Status
Open
Reason
Permission or license
Back to the top

Technical

RULTechMD (ID = TECHNICAL1)
ContentModel
ETD
OperatingSystem (VERSION = 5.1)
windows xp
Back to the top
Version 8.5.5
Rutgers University Libraries - Copyright ©2024