In the first decades of the twentieth century, the British Indian Army went from being a force to suppress internal dissent and protect the borders of the subcontinent to a highly mobile army stationed around the globe. British needs for additional overseas forces meant combining three distinct regional armies of Bengal, Madras, and Bombay into a nominally united “Indian” Army. This single military force hid the recruiting biases and theories of martial difference that signaled the fracture, rather than the unity, of the army and the imperial project. This dissertation examines how the institutional changes of the British Indian Army enabled the social and cultural preconditions for the transition from colonial rule to a “globalized” post-colonial order. The British Indian Army in the twentieth century prided itself on its central organization as an “Indian” Army, but the men who served as troops hailed from diverse regions of India as well as the modern nation states of Pakistan, Afghanistan, Nepal, and Bangladesh. The centrality of a nation-state ideal underpinning the “Indian” army not only figured into debates about anti-colonial nationalism, but in the increasing global mobility of both British and South Asian men. Britons and South Asians migrated to and worked in diverse imperial locales—from Australia to New Zealand, Singapore to Hong Kong. Yet the differences between men were not only racial and regional. Significant class and caste disparities existed between the upwardly mobile cosmopolitan Indian officers and their low-ranking and uneducated enlisted counterparts. This encouraged further divisions between those able and willing to gain from a post-colonial Indian nation-state and those who would be left behind. Institutional biases also favored certain expressions of faith and devotion, racializing and militarizing the beliefs and practices of British Christians, Nepalese Gurkhas, and Punjabi Muslims and Sikhs. The British Indian Army’s diversity and international fragmentation signaled that nation states struggled to keep pace with or claim a place for themselves in a new international order. “Globalization” served as an alternative but parallel model to empire. This story is about how diversity was managed—or failed to be managed—in a global and colonial army. The experience of imperial service further unspooled the controlled uniformity that imperial and military life demanded.
Subject (authority = RUETD)
Topic
History
Subject (authority = ETD-LCSH)
Topic
Great Britain--Colonies
Subject (authority = ETD-LCSH)
Topic
Great Britain. Army. British Indian Army
RelatedItem (type = host)
TitleInfo
Title
Rutgers University Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Identifier (type = RULIB)
ETD
Identifier
ETD_7111
PhysicalDescription
Form (authority = gmd)
electronic resource
InternetMediaType
application/pdf
InternetMediaType
text/xml
Extent
1 online resource (viii, 324 p.)
Note (type = degree)
Ph.D.
Note (type = bibliography)
Includes bibliographical references
Note (type = statement of responsibility)
by Kate Alison Imy
RelatedItem (type = host)
TitleInfo
Title
Graduate School - New Brunswick Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Identifier (type = local)
rucore19991600001
Location
PhysicalLocation (authority = marcorg); (displayLabel = Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey)
Rutgers University. Graduate School - New Brunswick
AssociatedObject
Type
License
Name
Author Agreement License
Detail
I hereby grant to the Rutgers University Libraries and to my school the non-exclusive right to archive, reproduce and distribute my thesis or dissertation, in whole or in part, and/or my abstract, in whole or in part, in and from an electronic format, subject to the release date subsequently stipulated in this submittal form and approved by my school. I represent and stipulate that the thesis or dissertation and its abstract are my original work, that they do not infringe or violate any rights of others, and that I make these grants as the sole owner of the rights to my thesis or dissertation and its abstract. I represent that I have obtained written permissions, when necessary, from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis or dissertation and will supply copies of such upon request by my school. I acknowledge that RU ETD and my school will not distribute my thesis or dissertation or its abstract if, in their reasonable judgment, they believe all such rights have not been secured. I acknowledge that I retain ownership rights to the copyright of my work. I also retain the right to use all or part of this thesis or dissertation in future works, such as articles or books.