In recent years knowledge required for effective mathematics teaching has become more defined. A key area is the importance of teachers’ attending to student reasoning (e.g., Hiebert et al., 1997). There is increasing evidence that students are capable of constructing “proof-like” forms of reasoning to justify their solutions to tasks (e.g., Maher & Martino, 1996). These and other findings have been influential in shaping national policy by developing Standards for Practice, behaviors that students engage in while doing mathematics, and are best taught in the context of meaningful mathematical activity, including collaboration and discourse (Carpenter et al., 1989). Consequently, there is need for teachers to become aware of the importance of these practices and ways of attending to students mathematical reasoning. There is extensive work documenting that there is much to be gained by teachers studying episodes of children’s learning (e.g., Fennema, et al., 1996). There is also a substantial body of research in mathematics education and the learning sciences suggesting that creating opportunities for people to engage in generative and constructive ways with video has potential to support teacher learning. Research studies in teacher education suggest that both pre and in-service teachers can learn to recognize student reasoning by engaging in collaborative problem solving and then studying videos of children working on the same task (Maher, 2011). This study describes a course model, designed to examine teacher shifts in knowledge related to recognizing children’s mathematical reasoning. The design-based research was carried out over five years in a required course for mathematics education graduate students. The course addresses a review and study of literature in mathematics education research and practice, with special attention to collaborative problem solving, student learning, and emphasis on building knowledge within a designed setting. The results showed both pre (PST) and in-service teachers (IST) grew in their ability to recognize children’s reasoning. Analysis of course data provided insight into how teachers developed knowledge about student reasoning and how beliefs shifted in the process. Differences were identified between how PST and IST’s situated their experience. Implications of the study include recommendations for PST courses and PD programs.
Subject (authority = RUETD)
Topic
Education
RelatedItem (type = host)
TitleInfo
Title
Rutgers University Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Identifier (type = RULIB)
ETD
Identifier
ETD_7172
PhysicalDescription
Form (authority = gmd)
electronic resource
InternetMediaType
application/pdf
InternetMediaType
text/xml
Extent
1 online resource (xii, 194 p. : ill.)
Note (type = degree)
Ph.D.
Note (type = bibliography)
Includes bibliographical references
Subject (authority = ETD-LCSH)
Topic
Mathematics--Study and teaching
Subject (authority = ETD-LCSH)
Topic
Proof theory
Note (type = statement of responsibility)
by Robert Sigley
RelatedItem (type = host)
TitleInfo
Title
Graduate School - New Brunswick Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Identifier (type = local)
rucore19991600001
Location
PhysicalLocation (authority = marcorg); (displayLabel = Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey)
Rutgers University. Graduate School - New Brunswick
AssociatedObject
Type
License
Name
Author Agreement License
Detail
I hereby grant to the Rutgers University Libraries and to my school the non-exclusive right to archive, reproduce and distribute my thesis or dissertation, in whole or in part, and/or my abstract, in whole or in part, in and from an electronic format, subject to the release date subsequently stipulated in this submittal form and approved by my school. I represent and stipulate that the thesis or dissertation and its abstract are my original work, that they do not infringe or violate any rights of others, and that I make these grants as the sole owner of the rights to my thesis or dissertation and its abstract. I represent that I have obtained written permissions, when necessary, from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis or dissertation and will supply copies of such upon request by my school. I acknowledge that RU ETD and my school will not distribute my thesis or dissertation or its abstract if, in their reasonable judgment, they believe all such rights have not been secured. I acknowledge that I retain ownership rights to the copyright of my work. I also retain the right to use all or part of this thesis or dissertation in future works, such as articles or books.