Fighting against illegal immigration consumes a country’s financial sources which may lead to economic crisis; not fighting against illegal immigration, on the other hand, causes the emergence of identity and social fears. In other words, the struggle against illegal immigration not only costs a lot, but also poses risk in political terms to the countries that are involved in this process. Consequently, the illegal immigration policies could have the potential of ending in deadlock and becoming the reason of conflict between the related countries. This study examines the nature of relationship between the EU and Turkey in terms of illegal immigration policies. It also investigates to what extent Turkey carries out its responsibilities to the EU regarding the fight against illegal immigration. This study also examines whether or not the EU is rightful about its allegations against Turkey on the issue of illegal immigration. This study uses the following mixed method: The Content Analysis and Candidate Countries’ Eurobarometers (CCEB) Surveys. The data used in content analysis are obtained from the EU Reports and Turkish Adaptation to Acquis Documents. The statements in the documents were coded on the basis of Turkey’s progression status with a special focus on the topics. Another method used in the study is the CCEB Surveys obtained from the website of Interuniversity Consortium for Political and Social Research (ICPSR). These surveys were conducted in 2006 and 2007 in the EU member countries and candidate countries. The sample size of each survey was around 30.000. According to the results of the content analysis, Turkey made adequate progress in the following two fields: Fighting against illegal immigration and human trafficking. Turkey made no progress in repealing the geographical limitation. Turkey makes limited or inadequate progress in nine fields including signing and ratifying readmission agreement, handling asylum-seekers and refugees, developing training programs, setting up and improving the reception and removal centers, setting up a migration and asylum authority, alignment to external border policy and Schengen Agreement, setting up an integrated border management unit, setting up a unified and professional border guard and aligning to the EU Visa Policy. These inadequate progresses show that Turkish policy on illegal immigration is fluctuated and reluctant. According to the results of the Logistic Regression Analysis, the citizens of destination countries give almost three times higher priority on illegal immigration than the citizens of non-destination countries. Turkish citizens thinks that the EU should take collective responsibility on immigration policies, otherwise, they see the immigration as a risk for future integration to the EU. Turkish citizens are also less likely to support the joint EU efforts and they perceive immigration issues significantly less important than the citizens of destination countries. On the other hand, Turkey do not completely ignore the importance of fighting against illegal immigration. The citizens of non-destination countries are more likely to think that the EU should take further joint-responsibility on immigration issues. In fact, the perception of importance of illegal immigration and perceived risks for integration confirm that the citizens of non-destination countries regard the immigration issue as a responsibility of the EU. In conclusion, Turkey purposefully fights against illegal immigration in a limited way as it costs a lot and politically risky. Although illegal immigration is the problem of destination countries (Core EU countries), non-destination countries support destination countries on their fight against illegal immigration as well. Turkey prioritizes the problem but seems to be reluctant to take necessary actions. The EU and Turkey are in deadlock in terms of negotiations for fighting against illegal immigration in a full-fledged way.
Subject (authority = RUETD)
Topic
Global Affairs
RelatedItem (type = host)
TitleInfo
Title
Rutgers University Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Identifier (type = RULIB)
ETD
Identifier
ETD_7338
PhysicalDescription
Form (authority = gmd)
electronic resource
InternetMediaType
application/pdf
InternetMediaType
text/xml
Extent
1 online resource (x, 262 p. : ill.)
Note (type = degree)
Ph.D.
Note (type = bibliography)
Includes bibliographical references
Subject (authority = ETD-LCSH)
Topic
European Union countries--Emigration and immigration
Subject (authority = ETD-LCSH)
Topic
Europe--Emigration and immigration
Subject (authority = ETD-LCSH)
Topic
Turkey--Emigration and immigration
Note (type = statement of responsibility)
by Kazim Ciris
RelatedItem (type = host)
TitleInfo
Title
Graduate School - Newark Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Identifier (type = local)
rucore10002600001
Location
PhysicalLocation (authority = marcorg); (displayLabel = Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey)
I hereby grant to the Rutgers University Libraries and to my school the non-exclusive right to archive, reproduce and distribute my thesis or dissertation, in whole or in part, and/or my abstract, in whole or in part, in and from an electronic format, subject to the release date subsequently stipulated in this submittal form and approved by my school. I represent and stipulate that the thesis or dissertation and its abstract are my original work, that they do not infringe or violate any rights of others, and that I make these grants as the sole owner of the rights to my thesis or dissertation and its abstract. I represent that I have obtained written permissions, when necessary, from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis or dissertation and will supply copies of such upon request by my school. I acknowledge that RU ETD and my school will not distribute my thesis or dissertation or its abstract if, in their reasonable judgment, they believe all such rights have not been secured. I acknowledge that I retain ownership rights to the copyright of my work. I also retain the right to use all or part of this thesis or dissertation in future works, such as articles or books.