Staff View
Neoliberalism and urban education

Descriptive

TitleInfo
Title
Neoliberalism and urban education
SubTitle
exploring perceptions of competition about school choice and charter schools in an urban school district
Name (type = personal)
NamePart (type = family)
Davis
NamePart (type = given)
Kevin W.
NamePart (type = date)
1962-
DisplayForm
Kevin W. Davis
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
author
Name (type = personal)
NamePart (type = family)
Sadovnik
NamePart (type = given)
Alan
DisplayForm
Alan Sadovnik
Affiliation
Advisory Committee
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
chair
Name (type = personal)
NamePart (type = family)
Riccucci
NamePart (type = given)
Norma
DisplayForm
Norma Riccucci
Affiliation
Advisory Committee
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
internal member
Name (type = personal)
NamePart (type = family)
Thompson
NamePart (type = given)
Frank
DisplayForm
Frank Thompson
Affiliation
Advisory Committee
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
internal member
Name (type = personal)
NamePart (type = family)
Hull
NamePart (type = given)
Elizabeth
DisplayForm
Elizabeth Hull
Affiliation
Advisory Committee
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
outside member
Name (type = corporate)
NamePart
Rutgers University
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
degree grantor
Name (type = corporate)
NamePart
Graduate School - Newark
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
school
TypeOfResource
Text
Genre (authority = marcgt)
theses
OriginInfo
DateCreated (qualifier = exact)
2016
DateOther (qualifier = exact); (type = degree)
2016-05
CopyrightDate (encoding = w3cdtf); (qualifier = exact)
2016
Place
PlaceTerm (type = code)
xx
Language
LanguageTerm (authority = ISO639-2b); (type = code)
eng
Abstract (type = abstract)
School choice and charter schools have been presented as ways to induce competition in public school systems to improve student outcomes in underperforming urban school districts. This approach continues a trend in Western Europe and the United States to make public institutions operate more like the private sector and is indicative of Neoliberalism and New Public Management. The rationale relies on the theory that public sector actors are motivated by self-interested economic incentives. An alternative argument uses a public service perspective, that public employees are motivated by noneconomic factors. For competition to have an effect on student outcomes, charter schools have to be perceived as a threat to local school districts and district responses must be predicated on economic incentives. This study was conducted in two stages using an exploratory mixed-methods approach. To develop an alternative discourse from the state’s policies, a discursive analysis was conducted on archival documents that established school choice, charters schools, and education reform in New Jersey. Interpretation of the documents was used to design a questionnaire to measure perceptions of charter schools and education reform in New Jersey among urban school district personnel in one urban district in New Jersey. The interpretation of the documents established an alternative discourse of the public education reform that showed a bias toward urban and poor school districts. Survey findings showed a high level of opposition to neoliberal and neoconservative education reform initiatives. Respondents agreed that public education reform causes more harm than good in the district. This perspective that neoliberal public education reform adversely affects urban school districts focuses on policies to produce better student outcomes. Reform initiatives did not factor in societal conditions that affect student learning. Neoliberal and neoconservative solutions for correcting underperforming school districts are based on institutional changes such as school governance, teacher competency, and organizational management. Multiple research studies have shown that social conditions based on race, poverty, and employment have a significant impact on students’ ability to learn. This study shows that, despite state preferences for neoliberal education reform, public school personnel in this urban district overwhelmingly disagreed with these reforms.
Subject (authority = RUETD)
Topic
Public Administration (SPAA)
Subject (authority = ETD-LCSH)
Topic
Education, Urban
Subject (authority = ETD-LCSH)
Topic
Charter schools
RelatedItem (type = host)
TitleInfo
Title
Rutgers University Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Identifier (type = RULIB)
ETD
Identifier
ETD_7336
PhysicalDescription
Form (authority = gmd)
electronic resource
InternetMediaType
application/pdf
InternetMediaType
text/xml
Extent
1 online resource (xiv, 222 p. : ill.)
Note (type = degree)
Ph.D.
Note (type = bibliography)
Includes bibliographical references
Note (type = statement of responsibility)
by Kevin W. Davis
RelatedItem (type = host)
TitleInfo
Title
Graduate School - Newark Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Identifier (type = local)
rucore10002600001
Location
PhysicalLocation (authority = marcorg); (displayLabel = Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey)
NjNbRU
Identifier (type = doi)
doi:10.7282/T3T155V2
Genre (authority = ExL-Esploro)
ETD doctoral
Back to the top

Rights

RightsDeclaration (ID = rulibRdec0006)
The author owns the copyright to this work.
RightsHolder (type = personal)
Name
FamilyName
Davis
GivenName
Kevin
MiddleName
W.
Role
Copyright Holder
RightsEvent
Type
Permission or license
DateTime (encoding = w3cdtf); (qualifier = exact); (point = start)
2016-04-28 01:11:00
AssociatedEntity
Name
Kevin Davis
Role
Copyright holder
Affiliation
Rutgers University. Graduate School - Newark
AssociatedObject
Type
License
Name
Author Agreement License
Detail
I hereby grant to the Rutgers University Libraries and to my school the non-exclusive right to archive, reproduce and distribute my thesis or dissertation, in whole or in part, and/or my abstract, in whole or in part, in and from an electronic format, subject to the release date subsequently stipulated in this submittal form and approved by my school. I represent and stipulate that the thesis or dissertation and its abstract are my original work, that they do not infringe or violate any rights of others, and that I make these grants as the sole owner of the rights to my thesis or dissertation and its abstract. I represent that I have obtained written permissions, when necessary, from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis or dissertation and will supply copies of such upon request by my school. I acknowledge that RU ETD and my school will not distribute my thesis or dissertation or its abstract if, in their reasonable judgment, they believe all such rights have not been secured. I acknowledge that I retain ownership rights to the copyright of my work. I also retain the right to use all or part of this thesis or dissertation in future works, such as articles or books.
RightsEvent
DateTime (encoding = w3cdtf); (qualifier = exact); (point = start)
2016-05-31
DateTime (encoding = w3cdtf); (qualifier = exact); (point = end)
2017-05-31
Type
Embargo
Detail
Access to this PDF has been restricted at the author's request. It will be publicly available after May 31st, 2017.
Copyright
Status
Copyright protected
Availability
Status
Open
Reason
Permission or license
Back to the top

Technical

RULTechMD (ID = TECHNICAL1)
ContentModel
ETD
OperatingSystem (VERSION = 5.1)
windows xp
CreatingApplication
Version
1.5
DateCreated (point = end); (encoding = w3cdtf); (qualifier = exact)
2016-05-15T22:29:07
DateCreated (point = end); (encoding = w3cdtf); (qualifier = exact)
2016-05-15T22:29:07
ApplicationName
Microsoft® Word 2016
Back to the top
Version 8.5.5
Rutgers University Libraries - Copyright ©2024