The concept of “emotion regulation” has received increased attention in clinical psychology research and practice over the past three decades. Notable practitioners in the field have recently proposed psychotherapy models that place emphasis on “emotion regulation” as a treatment goal in psychotherapy, including Marsha Linehan (Dialectical Behavior Therapy, DBT, 1993a), David Barlow (Unified Protocol for Transdiagnostic Treatment of Emotional Disorders, UP, 2010), Leslie Greenberg (Emotion-Focused Therapy, EFT, 2002), and Diana Fosha (Accelerated Experiential Dynamic Therapy, AEDP, 2000). Despite the increasing importance of this construct, a review of the relevant literature suggests that it is inconsistently defined and operationalized. This dissertation clarifies how the construct of “emotion regulation” has been conceptualized by different authors. More, it considers the question: Does the shared focus on “emotion regulation” across diverse psychotherapy models represent a convergence of theory and practice among traditionally distinct schools of thought? In the service of answering this question, this project critically examines and compares the four psychotherapy models listed above (DBT, the UP, EFT, and AEDP) and their distinct positions on “emotion regulation.” Because this comparative work does not yet exist in the literature, this project sheds new light on the above questions. Namely, it shows that, despite their diverse theoretical foundations, DBT, the UP, EFT, and AEDP are all based on two main ideas regarding the genesis and treatment of psychopathology: 1) maladaptive cycles involving negative arousal, anxiety, and emotion avoidance play a principle role in the genesis and maintenance of “emotion dysregulation,” and 2) the way to treat “dysregulation” is to break those negative cycles by undoing avoidance. This dissertation also shows that there is significant convergence among the four models regarding their theories of therapeutic action: all four model focus on helping patients develop their capacities for mindfulness, metacognition, and viscerally experiencing emotions. This dissertation considers to what extent these theoretical convergences translate into practice and comments on the clinical implications and utility of this study. It concludes with questions and future directions for research in this rapidly developing field.
Subject (authority = RUETD)
Topic
Clinical Psychology
Subject (authority = ETD-LCSH)
Topic
Emotions
Subject (authority = ETD-LCSH)
Topic
Psychotherapy
RelatedItem (type = host)
TitleInfo
Title
Rutgers University Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Identifier (type = RULIB)
ETD
Identifier
ETD_7494
PhysicalDescription
Form (authority = gmd)
electronic resource
InternetMediaType
application/pdf
InternetMediaType
text/xml
Extent
1 online resource (viii, 166 p. : ill.)
Note (type = degree)
Psy.D.
Note (type = bibliography)
Includes bibliographical references
Note (type = statement of responsibility)
by Melissa L. Greenberg
RelatedItem (type = host)
TitleInfo
Title
Graduate School of Applied and Professional Psychology Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Identifier (type = local)
rucore10001800001
Location
PhysicalLocation (authority = marcorg); (displayLabel = Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey)
Rutgers University. Graduate School of Applied and Professional Psychology
AssociatedObject
Type
License
Name
Author Agreement License
Detail
I hereby grant to the Rutgers University Libraries and to my school the non-exclusive right to archive, reproduce and distribute my thesis or dissertation, in whole or in part, and/or my abstract, in whole or in part, in and from an electronic format, subject to the release date subsequently stipulated in this submittal form and approved by my school. I represent and stipulate that the thesis or dissertation and its abstract are my original work, that they do not infringe or violate any rights of others, and that I make these grants as the sole owner of the rights to my thesis or dissertation and its abstract. I represent that I have obtained written permissions, when necessary, from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis or dissertation and will supply copies of such upon request by my school. I acknowledge that RU ETD and my school will not distribute my thesis or dissertation or its abstract if, in their reasonable judgment, they believe all such rights have not been secured. I acknowledge that I retain ownership rights to the copyright of my work. I also retain the right to use all or part of this thesis or dissertation in future works, such as articles or books.