The dorsolateral striatum (DLS) is a prominent target of research on control of voluntary movement and sensorimotor integration. The DLS is comprised mainly (95%) of medium spiny projection neurons that receive direct monosynaptic projections from primary somatosensory (S1) and motor (M1) cortices. Roughly 50% of these neurons are type IIb GABAergic, medium spiny projection neurons (MSNs) whose firing rates (FRs) are related to sensorimotor activity of individual body parts. There is also a hypothesized dual organization of DLS outputs known as the “direct and indirect pathwaysâ€. According to this model, direct pathway MSNs project to the substantia nigra pars reticulata (SNr) and the internal segment of the globus pallidus (GPi), leading to disinhibition of the thalamus and facilitation of movement. Conversely the indirect pathway projects to the SNr via the globus pallidus external segment (GPe) and then the subthalamic nucleus (STN), inhibiting the thalamus and reducing movement. In addition to their distinct projections, MSNs of the direct and indirect pathway are characterized by differential expression of dopamine receptors. Dopamine Drd1 is expressed by direct pathway MSNs, whereas Drd2 is expressed by indirect pathway MSNs. While there has been a significant amount of research testing the functional hypotheses generated by iii the direct and indirect pathways framework, no study has attempted to reconcile the very well classified striatal type IIb neurons with the aforementioned functional tenet of the hypothesis. The present study utilized AAV-EF1a-FLEx-Chronos-GFP to visualize and optogenetically identify Drd1 and Drd2 MSNs in Cre-animals. We then performed somatosensory motor exams in order to identify type IIb MSNs and fill the gap in the literature. We found that in Drd1-Cre animals, Chronos-GFP expressing neurons projected to GPi, while in Drd2-Cre animals, Chronos-GFP expressing neurons projected to GPe, providing evidence that Drd1-Cre and Drd2-Cre animals are valid models of the direct and indirect pathways. Further, we were able to unambiguously identify Drd1 and Drd2 MSNs in the striatum of awake, behaving mice using light stimulation. We were subsequently able show that both the direct (Drd1) and indirect (Drd2) pathways contain type IIb neurons with firing related to stimulation of body parts. This evidence brings into question the notion that Drd1 neurons promote movement, while Drd2 neurons inhibit it. Rather, it seems that Drd1 and Drd2 neurons process sensorimotor information similarly, with both Drd1 and Drd2 neurons exhibiting increased phasic firing during body part stimulation and movement. While the anatomical aspects of the direct and indirect pathways hypothesis are strongly corroborated, the functional aspect appears to need a critical reevaluation.
Subject (authority = RUETD)
Topic
Psychology
RelatedItem (type = host)
TitleInfo
Title
Rutgers University Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Identifier (type = RULIB)
ETD
Identifier
ETD_7474
PhysicalDescription
Form (authority = gmd)
electronic resource
InternetMediaType
application/pdf
InternetMediaType
text/xml
Extent
1 online resource (iv, 46 p. : ill.)
Note (type = degree)
Ph.D.
Note (type = bibliography)
Includes bibliographical references
Subject (authority = ETD-LCSH)
Topic
Optogenetics
Subject (authority = ETD-LCSH)
Topic
Neurons
Note (type = statement of responsibility)
by Kevin Coffey
RelatedItem (type = host)
TitleInfo
Title
Graduate School - New Brunswick Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Identifier (type = local)
rucore19991600001
Location
PhysicalLocation (authority = marcorg); (displayLabel = Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey)
Rutgers University. Graduate School - New Brunswick
AssociatedObject
Type
License
Name
Author Agreement License
Detail
I hereby grant to the Rutgers University Libraries and to my school the non-exclusive right to archive, reproduce and distribute my thesis or dissertation, in whole or in part, and/or my abstract, in whole or in part, in and from an electronic format, subject to the release date subsequently stipulated in this submittal form and approved by my school. I represent and stipulate that the thesis or dissertation and its abstract are my original work, that they do not infringe or violate any rights of others, and that I make these grants as the sole owner of the rights to my thesis or dissertation and its abstract. I represent that I have obtained written permissions, when necessary, from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis or dissertation and will supply copies of such upon request by my school. I acknowledge that RU ETD and my school will not distribute my thesis or dissertation or its abstract if, in their reasonable judgment, they believe all such rights have not been secured. I acknowledge that I retain ownership rights to the copyright of my work. I also retain the right to use all or part of this thesis or dissertation in future works, such as articles or books.