Trabecular bone remodels in response to its mechanical loading environment. Thus, different types of loading and locomotion should produce distinctive trabecular architecture, enabling the reconstruction of locomotor regime from trabecular bone. While this relationship has been investigated in the appendicular skeleton of extant and fossil primates, it has yet to be examined in the pelvis, in spite of its central role in hindlimb-driven locomotion. This dissertation explores the relationship between loading, locomotion, and trabecular architecture in the ilium and ischium of a sample of extant primates and attempts to reconstruct locomotion in one fossil specimen, Rudapithecus hungaricus. Based on the general principles of bone functional adaptation, that trabecular architecture remodels via changes in density and anisotropy in response to use, the general predictions of this work are that primates subjecting their innominates to greater, more stereotyped loads will have denser and/or more anisotropic trabecular architecture relative to primates that load their pelves less or in less stereotyped ways. I used high-resolution X-ray computed tomography scans of 29 innominates to compare standard measures of density and anisotropy within and between seven species of primates utilizing different locomotor modes. My results provided mixed support for loading and locomotor hypotheses. In the ilium, intraspecific analyses and interspecific density results sometimes corresponded to predictions, while interspecific comparisons of anisotropy more clearly indicated support for locomotor hypotheses (as has been seen in previous work). Specifically, these comparisons suggested that semi-terrestrial/terrestrial quadrupeds have more anisotropic trabecular architecture than arboreal suspensors. Additionally, for non-human primates, comparisons within phylogenetic groups produced anisotropy results that conformed to locomotor predictions. In the ischium, bending (dorsal compression/ventral tension) appears to be the dominant loading regime in non-human primates, as the dorsal column of trabecular bone tends to be denser and more anisotropic than the ventral column. In terms of the interspecific locomotor hypotheses, differences appear to exist between the trabecular architecture of terrestrial and arboreal primates, as well as between taxa belonging to different locomotor categories, though these differences did not always conform to predictions. Results of the attempt to reconstruct loading in Rudapithecus (proposed to be an arboreal quadruped with adaptations to below-branch suspension) suggested that it had the greatest similarity in trabecular architecture to Symphalangus syndactylus, which is not inconsistent with its predicted locomotor regime.
Subject (authority = RUETD)
Topic
Anthropology
Subject (authority = ETD-LCSH)
Topic
Bone densitometry
RelatedItem (type = host)
TitleInfo
Title
Rutgers University Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Identifier (type = RULIB)
ETD
Identifier
ETD_7666
PhysicalDescription
Form (authority = gmd)
electronic resource
InternetMediaType
application/pdf
InternetMediaType
text/xml
Extent
1 online resource (xii, 313 p. : ill.)
Note (type = degree)
Ph.D.
Note (type = bibliography)
Includes bibliographical references
Note (type = statement of responsibility)
by Darshana F. Shapiro
RelatedItem (type = host)
TitleInfo
Title
Graduate School - New Brunswick Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Identifier (type = local)
rucore19991600001
Location
PhysicalLocation (authority = marcorg); (displayLabel = Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey)
Rutgers University. Graduate School - New Brunswick
AssociatedObject
Type
License
Name
Author Agreement License
Detail
I hereby grant to the Rutgers University Libraries and to my school the non-exclusive right to archive, reproduce and distribute my thesis or dissertation, in whole or in part, and/or my abstract, in whole or in part, in and from an electronic format, subject to the release date subsequently stipulated in this submittal form and approved by my school. I represent and stipulate that the thesis or dissertation and its abstract are my original work, that they do not infringe or violate any rights of others, and that I make these grants as the sole owner of the rights to my thesis or dissertation and its abstract. I represent that I have obtained written permissions, when necessary, from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis or dissertation and will supply copies of such upon request by my school. I acknowledge that RU ETD and my school will not distribute my thesis or dissertation or its abstract if, in their reasonable judgment, they believe all such rights have not been secured. I acknowledge that I retain ownership rights to the copyright of my work. I also retain the right to use all or part of this thesis or dissertation in future works, such as articles or books.