Staff View
Let the Seuss loose

Descriptive

TitleInfo
Title
Let the Seuss loose
SubTitle
limitations on standardized testing
Name (type = personal)
NamePart (type = family)
Rapps
NamePart (type = given)
Anthony M.
DisplayForm
Anthony M. Rapps
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
author
Name (type = personal)
NamePart (type = family)
Singley
NamePart (type = given)
Carol
DisplayForm
Carol Singley
Affiliation
Advisory Committee
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
chair
Name (type = corporate)
NamePart
Rutgers University
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
degree grantor
Name (type = corporate)
NamePart
Camden Graduate School
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
school
TypeOfResource
Text
Genre (authority = marcgt)
theses
OriginInfo
DateCreated (qualifier = exact)
2017
DateOther (qualifier = exact); (type = degree)
2017-01
CopyrightDate (encoding = w3cdtf); (qualifier = exact)
2017
Place
PlaceTerm (type = code)
xx
Language
LanguageTerm (authority = ISO639-2b); (type = code)
eng
Abstract (type = abstract)
Modern education relies on standardized testing as a quantitative tool to validate the quality of education in the United States today. From as early as the 1800s standardized tests have been a part of the American fabric after they were first administered to immigrants trying to enter the United States, and as observed by W.J. Popham, “when the government administered the Army Alpha intelligence test to about 1.75 million U.S. Army recruits in an effort to identify the most suitable candidates for officer training programs” (47). Since then, standardized testing has been employed to asses individual skill levels across a variety of social, industrial, and educational platforms. According to economist and author Peter Sacks, “the case against standardized mental testing may be as intellectually and ethically rigorous as any argument made about social policy in the past twenty years, but such testing continues to dominate the education system, carving further inroads into the employment arena as well, having been bolstered in recent years by conservative backlash advocating advancement by merit” (25). This study will identify the impact standardized testing has on student education and describe the limitations on critical thinking found as a result of performance testing in schools from elementary school to college. Specifically, it will speak to the phenomenon of a teach-to-test methodology that inhibits students’ abilities to adequately apply critical thinking skills when facing real-life problems. This phenomenon, teach-to-test, is due to a major obstacle that educators face because they are forced, because of testing, to focus on specific topics in a fixed amount of time. Educators may not have enough time to teach students that more than one solution is available. It is here that the teach-to-test methodology does the most damage to students, as they rely on a singular approach when addressing problems. Residual effects of a teach-to-test methodology include potential threats to higher education as standardized tests are often used to identify potential candidates for admission into colleges and universities. Furthermore, a reliance on standardized testing may inhibit students’ ability to apply critical thinking skills in the workforce, where our future leaders will face new and challenging issues daily. Lastly, this study will explore how using the literary works of Dr. Seuss can be a viable option to combat the teach-to-test methodology found in both the classroom and in the workforce as everyone will soon learn about the hidden messages that can be found in every Dr. Seuss story. Using literature that requires critical analysis to understand the entire text can help harness critical thinking skills that can be applied to learning both inside and outside of the classroom.
Subject (authority = RUETD)
Topic
Liberal Studies
Subject (authority = ETD-LCSH)
Topic
Educational tests and measurements
Subject (authority = ETD-LCSH)
RelatedItem (type = host)
TitleInfo
Title
Rutgers University Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Identifier (type = RULIB)
ETD
Identifier
ETD_7797
PhysicalDescription
Form (authority = gmd)
electronic resource
InternetMediaType
application/pdf
InternetMediaType
text/xml
Extent
1 online resource (iii, 36 p.)
Note (type = degree)
M.A.
Note (type = bibliography)
Includes bibliographical references
Note (type = statement of responsibility)
by Anthony M. Rapps
Subject
Name (authority = LC-NAF)
NamePart (type = personal)
Geisel, Theodor Seuss, 1904-1991
RelatedItem (type = host)
TitleInfo
Title
Camden Graduate School Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Identifier (type = local)
rucore10005600001
Location
PhysicalLocation (authority = marcorg); (displayLabel = Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey)
NjNbRU
Identifier (type = doi)
doi:10.7282/T37W6FMZ
Genre (authority = ExL-Esploro)
ETD graduate
Back to the top

Rights

RightsDeclaration (ID = rulibRdec0006)
The author owns the copyright to this work.
RightsHolder (type = personal)
Name
FamilyName
Rapps
GivenName
Anthony
MiddleName
M.
Role
Copyright Holder
RightsEvent
Type
Permission or license
DateTime (encoding = w3cdtf); (qualifier = exact); (point = start)
2016-12-22 11:26:18
AssociatedEntity
Name
Anthony Rapps
Role
Copyright holder
Affiliation
Rutgers University. Camden Graduate School
AssociatedObject
Type
License
Name
Author Agreement License
Detail
I hereby grant to the Rutgers University Libraries and to my school the non-exclusive right to archive, reproduce and distribute my thesis or dissertation, in whole or in part, and/or my abstract, in whole or in part, in and from an electronic format, subject to the release date subsequently stipulated in this submittal form and approved by my school. I represent and stipulate that the thesis or dissertation and its abstract are my original work, that they do not infringe or violate any rights of others, and that I make these grants as the sole owner of the rights to my thesis or dissertation and its abstract. I represent that I have obtained written permissions, when necessary, from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis or dissertation and will supply copies of such upon request by my school. I acknowledge that RU ETD and my school will not distribute my thesis or dissertation or its abstract if, in their reasonable judgment, they believe all such rights have not been secured. I acknowledge that I retain ownership rights to the copyright of my work. I also retain the right to use all or part of this thesis or dissertation in future works, such as articles or books.
Copyright
Status
Copyright protected
Availability
Status
Open
Reason
Permission or license
Back to the top

Technical

RULTechMD (ID = TECHNICAL1)
ContentModel
ETD
OperatingSystem (VERSION = 5.1)
windows xp
CreatingApplication
Version
1.3
ApplicationName
Mac OS X 10.10.5 Quartz PDFContext
DateCreated (point = end); (encoding = w3cdtf); (qualifier = exact)
2017-01-04T16:05:00
DateCreated (point = end); (encoding = w3cdtf); (qualifier = exact)
2017-01-04T16:05:00
Back to the top
Version 8.5.5
Rutgers University Libraries - Copyright ©2024