Staff View
Creating and using VMCAnalytics for preservice teachers' studying of argumentation

Descriptive

TitleInfo
Title
Creating and using VMCAnalytics for preservice teachers' studying of argumentation
Name (type = personal)
NamePart (type = family)
Van Ness
NamePart (type = given)
Cheryl K.
NamePart (type = date)
1968-
DisplayForm
Cheryl K. Van Ness
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
author
Name (type = personal)
NamePart (type = family)
Maher
NamePart (type = given)
Carolyn A
DisplayForm
Carolyn A Maher
Affiliation
Advisory Committee
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
chair
Name (type = personal)
NamePart (type = family)
Kalantari
NamePart (type = given)
Bahman
DisplayForm
Bahman Kalantari
Affiliation
Advisory Committee
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
internal member
Name (type = personal)
NamePart (type = family)
Powell
NamePart (type = given)
Arthur
DisplayForm
Arthur Powell
Affiliation
Advisory Committee
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
internal member
Name (type = personal)
NamePart (type = family)
Alston
NamePart (type = given)
Alice
DisplayForm
Alice Alston
Affiliation
Advisory Committee
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
outside member
Name (type = corporate)
NamePart
Rutgers University
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
degree grantor
Name (type = corporate)
NamePart
Graduate School - New Brunswick
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
school
TypeOfResource
Text
Genre (authority = marcgt)
theses
OriginInfo
DateCreated (qualifier = exact)
2017
DateOther (qualifier = exact); (type = degree)
2017-01
CopyrightDate (encoding = w3cdtf); (qualifier = exact)
2017
Place
PlaceTerm (type = code)
xx
Language
LanguageTerm (authority = ISO639-2b); (type = code)
eng
Abstract (type = abstract)
Teacher recognition of student argumentation has been addressed by many researchers (e.g., Schwarz, 2009; Krummheuer, 1995; Bieda & Lepak, 2014; Whitenack & Yackel, 2002). Further, standards for mathematics learning emphasize the importance of including argumentation in the K-12 classroom (NCTM, 2000; CCSS, 2010). The study reported here with secondary preservice teachers to identify argumentation from video, adds to earlier, successful work using video to support the learning of preservice teachers (Sherin & Han, 2004) and to support teacher noticing (Van Es & Sherin, 2008; Star & Strickland, 2007). Further, studying video narratives has been used effectively in university courses to encourage students to engage with complex issues, collaborate, discuss, and build representations, and can help instructors gain insight into student thinking (Hmelo-Silver et al., 2013). This qualitative case study examined the effect of a semester-long intervention with eleven preservice teachers during the spring of 2015. Episodes of student argumentation from the Video Mosaic Collaborative (VMC), an open-source video collection, were used to construct video narratives using the RUanalytic Tool (Agnew, Mills, & Maher, 2010) of students engaged in argumentation. Findings from this study indicate that video narratives supported growth in the preservice teachers' understanding of student argumentation, indicating that for 93.3% of the events in the study, at least 45% of teachers exhibited growth and for 73.3% of the events in the study, at least 54% of teacher exhibited growth. Teachers demonstrated growth with respect to: (1) the elements of argumentation and (2) the structure of the argumentation they described; as well as (3) the use of the technical language of the formal mathematical register of argumentation they used. Other changes included making implicit argumentation explicit, using students' actual language rather than interpreting students' statements, and eliminating untrue statements about the argumentation in the events. Furthermore, there was a relationship among the categories, for example, the growth in use of technical language correlated to both growth in elements and growth in structure. Implications of the study and future research recommendations include comparing the results of other iterations of the study and using VMCAnalytics to support other mathematical practices.
Subject (authority = RUETD)
Topic
Education
Subject (authority = ETD-LCSH)
Topic
Debates and debating
Subject (authority = ETD-LCSH)
Topic
Motivation in education
RelatedItem (type = host)
TitleInfo
Title
Rutgers University Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Identifier (type = RULIB)
ETD
Identifier
ETD_7786
PhysicalDescription
Form (authority = gmd)
electronic resource
InternetMediaType
application/pdf
InternetMediaType
text/xml
Note
Supplementary File: Outside member Vitae
Extent
1 online resource (xxxvii, 592 p. : ill.)
Note (type = degree)
Ph.D.
Note (type = bibliography)
Includes bibliographical references
Note (type = statement of responsibility)
by Cheryl K. Van Ness
RelatedItem (type = host)
TitleInfo
Title
Graduate School - New Brunswick Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Identifier (type = local)
rucore19991600001
Location
PhysicalLocation (authority = marcorg); (displayLabel = Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey)
NjNbRU
Identifier (type = doi)
doi:10.7282/T34X5B7T
Genre (authority = ExL-Esploro)
ETD doctoral
Back to the top

Rights

RightsDeclaration (ID = rulibRdec0006)
The author owns the copyright to this work.
RightsHolder (type = personal)
Name
FamilyName
Van Ness
GivenName
Cheryl
MiddleName
K.
Role
Copyright Holder
RightsEvent
Type
Permission or license
DateTime (encoding = w3cdtf); (qualifier = exact); (point = start)
2016-12-18 19:35:04
AssociatedEntity
Name
Cheryl Van Ness
Role
Copyright holder
Affiliation
Rutgers University. Graduate School - New Brunswick
AssociatedObject
Type
License
Name
Author Agreement License
Detail
I hereby grant to the Rutgers University Libraries and to my school the non-exclusive right to archive, reproduce and distribute my thesis or dissertation, in whole or in part, and/or my abstract, in whole or in part, in and from an electronic format, subject to the release date subsequently stipulated in this submittal form and approved by my school. I represent and stipulate that the thesis or dissertation and its abstract are my original work, that they do not infringe or violate any rights of others, and that I make these grants as the sole owner of the rights to my thesis or dissertation and its abstract. I represent that I have obtained written permissions, when necessary, from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis or dissertation and will supply copies of such upon request by my school. I acknowledge that RU ETD and my school will not distribute my thesis or dissertation or its abstract if, in their reasonable judgment, they believe all such rights have not been secured. I acknowledge that I retain ownership rights to the copyright of my work. I also retain the right to use all or part of this thesis or dissertation in future works, such as articles or books.
Copyright
Status
Copyright protected
Availability
Status
Open
Reason
Permission or license
Back to the top

Technical

RULTechMD (ID = TECHNICAL1)
ContentModel
ETD
OperatingSystem (VERSION = 5.1)
windows xp
CreatingApplication
Version
1.6
DateCreated (point = end); (encoding = w3cdtf); (qualifier = exact)
2016-12-21T19:25:10
DateCreated (point = end); (encoding = w3cdtf); (qualifier = exact)
2016-12-21T19:25:10
ApplicationName
Adobe PDF Library 11.0
RULTechMD (ID = TECHNICAL2)
ContentModel
ETD
CreatingApplication
ApplicationName
Microsoft Office Word
DateCreated (point = end); (encoding = w3cdtf); (qualifier = exact)
2014-11-18T17:00:00
DateCreated (point = end); (encoding = w3cdtf); (qualifier = exact)
2014-11-18T17:00:00
Version
14.0000
Back to the top
Version 8.5.5
Rutgers University Libraries - Copyright ©2024