Staff View
Validity of the common assessment ingredient tool

Descriptive

TitleInfo
Title
Validity of the common assessment ingredient tool
SubTitle
empowerment and satisfaction
Name (type = personal)
NamePart (type = family)
Basto
NamePart (type = given)
Peter M.
NamePart (type = date)
1957-
DisplayForm
Peter M. Basto
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
author
Name (type = personal)
NamePart (type = family)
Pratt
NamePart (type = given)
Carlos W
DisplayForm
Carlos W Pratt
Affiliation
Advisory Committee
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
chair
Name (type = personal)
NamePart (type = family)
Herrick
NamePart (type = given)
Samantha J
DisplayForm
Samantha J Herrick
Affiliation
Advisory Committee
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
internal member
Name (type = personal)
NamePart (type = family)
Schmidt
NamePart (type = given)
Lisa T
DisplayForm
Lisa T Schmidt
Affiliation
Advisory Committee
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
outside member
Name (type = corporate)
NamePart
Rutgers University
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
degree grantor
Name (type = corporate)
NamePart
School of Health Professions
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
school
TypeOfResource
Text
Genre (authority = marcgt)
theses
OriginInfo
DateCreated (qualifier = exact)
2017
DateOther (qualifier = exact); (type = degree)
2017-05
CopyrightDate (encoding = w3cdtf); (qualifier = exact)
2017
Place
PlaceTerm (type = code)
xx
Language
LanguageTerm (authority = ISO639-2b); (type = code)
eng
Abstract (type = abstract)
This archival project examines the validity of the Fidelity Assessment Common Ingredients Tool (FACIT) and its relationship to empowerment and satisfaction with people who have psychiatric disabilities and attended Peer Operated Service Programs (POSP) in New Jersey. Participants completed the Making Decisions Empowerment Scale (MDES), Personal Empowerment Scale (PES) and the Self-Help Agency Satisfaction Scale (SHASS). FACIT scores from each POSP were obtained from a related project and were used to assess whether the FACIT measures empowerment and satisfaction which are key elements of peer run services. Canonical correlational analysis was used between the three scales and the six domains of the FACIT which consist of structure, environment, belief principle, peer support, education, and advocacy. It was hypothesized that if the FACIT is a valid instrument measuring how well a program is adhering to the peer model, then there should be a positive relationship between the measures used and the domains of the FACIT. Two analyses were completed. One had an even amount of cases per POSP (N =180), and the other had an uneven number of cases (N = 206). A statistical significant relationship was found between the uneven cases and the first canonical function of empowerment and satisfaction with the six subscales of the FACIT. Further examination of the canonical weights and cross weights determined that the relationship was weak. There was no statistical significance found in the analysis of the even cases indicating a possible Type I error may have occurred. The FACIT appears to focus more on structure and organization instead of empowerment and satisfaction. More research is needed to determine if the FACIT measures other elements of POSP services. The FACIT is difficult to use and there is little evidence of widespread use by POSP. Creating a more user-friendly fidelity tool for POSP could help improve services and ensure that the elements that are essential to POSP services are being implemented.
Subject (authority = RUETD)
Topic
Psychiatric Rehabilitation
RelatedItem (type = host)
TitleInfo
Title
Rutgers University Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Identifier (type = RULIB)
ETD
Identifier
ETD_8010
PhysicalDescription
Form (authority = gmd)
electronic resource
InternetMediaType
application/pdf
InternetMediaType
text/xml
Extent
1 online resource (251 p. : ill.)
Note (type = degree)
Ph.D.
Note (type = bibliography)
Includes bibliographical references
Note (type = statement of responsibility)
by Peter M. Basto
RelatedItem (type = host)
TitleInfo
Title
School of Health Related Professions ETD Collection
Identifier (type = local)
rucore10007400001
Location
PhysicalLocation (authority = marcorg); (displayLabel = Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey)
NjNbRU
Identifier (type = doi)
doi:10.7282/T3J38WCT
Genre (authority = ExL-Esploro)
ETD doctoral
Back to the top

Rights

RightsDeclaration (ID = rulibRdec0006)
The author owns the copyright to this work.
RightsHolder (type = personal)
Name
FamilyName
Basto
GivenName
Peter
MiddleName
M.
Role
Copyright Holder
RightsEvent
Type
Permission or license
DateTime (encoding = w3cdtf); (qualifier = exact); (point = start)
2017-04-13 11:53:00
AssociatedEntity
Name
Peter Basto
Role
Copyright holder
Affiliation
Rutgers University. School of Health Professions
AssociatedObject
Type
License
Name
Author Agreement License
Detail
I hereby grant to the Rutgers University Libraries and to my school the non-exclusive right to archive, reproduce and distribute my thesis or dissertation, in whole or in part, and/or my abstract, in whole or in part, in and from an electronic format, subject to the release date subsequently stipulated in this submittal form and approved by my school. I represent and stipulate that the thesis or dissertation and its abstract are my original work, that they do not infringe or violate any rights of others, and that I make these grants as the sole owner of the rights to my thesis or dissertation and its abstract. I represent that I have obtained written permissions, when necessary, from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis or dissertation and will supply copies of such upon request by my school. I acknowledge that RU ETD and my school will not distribute my thesis or dissertation or its abstract if, in their reasonable judgment, they believe all such rights have not been secured. I acknowledge that I retain ownership rights to the copyright of my work. I also retain the right to use all or part of this thesis or dissertation in future works, such as articles or books.
Copyright
Status
Copyright protected
Availability
Status
Open
Reason
Permission or license
Back to the top

Technical

RULTechMD (ID = TECHNICAL1)
ContentModel
ETD
OperatingSystem (VERSION = 5.1)
windows xp
CreatingApplication
Version
1.4
DateCreated (point = end); (encoding = w3cdtf); (qualifier = exact)
2017-04-17T22:43:45
DateCreated (point = end); (encoding = w3cdtf); (qualifier = exact)
2017-04-17T22:52:01
ApplicationName
Adobe PDF Library 11.0
Back to the top
Version 8.5.5
Rutgers University Libraries - Copyright ©2024