Gathering and integrating information from spatially distinct and qualitatively different sources requires decisions about when and where to sample information. An example is reading graphs and accompanying text to arrive at a coherent interpretation. Eye movements were recorded while subjects viewed bar graphs depicting information about two attributes of two fictitious products, along with descriptive text, after which subjects indicated which product they preferred. Three perceptual-motor configurations were tested: (1) Simultaneous: Graph and text were displayed adjacent to each other; (2) Button-Press: Graph and text appeared sequentially, with the appearance of each triggered by a button press; and (3) Eye-Contingent: Graph and text appeared sequentially, in the same spatial locations as in the Simultaneous condition, with the appearance of each triggered by a saccade into the region. Shifts of gaze between graph and text occurred about twice as often in the Simultaneous condition than in either Button-Press or Eye-Contingent conditions. The rate of shifts in the Button-Press and Eye-Contingent conditions did not differ, showing that the relevant factor was not motor effort (saccade vs. button press), but rather the sequential vs. simultaneous aspects of the presentations. Conditions did not differ either in trial duration or in the proportion of time spent in the graph or text. In the Simultaneous condition, most trials began with relatively long inspections of the graph and the text, with a preference to view the text first. The initial inspections of the graph or text were then followed by one or two relatively brief visits to each. Patterns were different for the other two perceptual-motor conditions in that the initial inspections of graph or text were typically longer and the subsequent visits to each were rare. Analyses of fixated locations showed a preference to use the more frequent visits in the Simultaneous condition to re-examine previously seen material rather than to look at new material. The simultaneous availability of graph and text did not necessarily encourage a strategy of inspecting each region in segments but spread out the reviewing time across subsequent visits to graph and text. These results show that the strategies used to integrate information across graphs and text depend on more than just the information content, and are influenced by even relatively minor variations of perceptual availability. The extra steps involved in conditions aside from the Simultaneous condition may discourage saccades as a part of an overall strategy of conserving neural costs or cognitive load. The relative perceptual availability of information in different spatial regions must be taken into account when developing models of cognitive strategies on the basis of observed saccadic patterns.
Subject (authority = RUETD)
Topic
Psychology
Subject (authority = ETD-LCSH)
Topic
Cognitive psychology
RelatedItem (type = host)
TitleInfo
Title
Rutgers University Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Identifier (type = RULIB)
ETD
Identifier
ETD_8326
PhysicalDescription
Form (authority = gmd)
electronic resource
InternetMediaType
application/pdf
InternetMediaType
text/xml
Extent
1 online resource (vi, 39 p. : ill.)
Note (type = degree)
M.S.
Note (type = bibliography)
Includes bibliographical references
Note (type = statement of responsibility)
by Jason F. Rubinstein
RelatedItem (type = host)
TitleInfo
Title
School of Graduate Studies Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Identifier (type = local)
rucore10001600001
Location
PhysicalLocation (authority = marcorg); (displayLabel = Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey)
I hereby grant to the Rutgers University Libraries and to my school the non-exclusive right to archive, reproduce and distribute my thesis or dissertation, in whole or in part, and/or my abstract, in whole or in part, in and from an electronic format, subject to the release date subsequently stipulated in this submittal form and approved by my school. I represent and stipulate that the thesis or dissertation and its abstract are my original work, that they do not infringe or violate any rights of others, and that I make these grants as the sole owner of the rights to my thesis or dissertation and its abstract. I represent that I have obtained written permissions, when necessary, from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis or dissertation and will supply copies of such upon request by my school. I acknowledge that RU ETD and my school will not distribute my thesis or dissertation or its abstract if, in their reasonable judgment, they believe all such rights have not been secured. I acknowledge that I retain ownership rights to the copyright of my work. I also retain the right to use all or part of this thesis or dissertation in future works, such as articles or books.