Staff View
Staying afloat as a new teacher

Descriptive

TitleInfo
Title
Staying afloat as a new teacher
SubTitle
a case study evaluation of a middle school induction program
Name (type = personal)
NamePart (type = family)
Medina
NamePart (type = given)
Jonathan
NamePart (type = date)
1987-
DisplayForm
Jonathan Medina
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
author
Name (type = personal)
NamePart (type = family)
O'Donnell
NamePart (type = given)
Angela
DisplayForm
Angela O'Donnell
Affiliation
Advisory Committee
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
chair
Name (type = corporate)
NamePart
Rutgers University
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
degree grantor
Name (type = corporate)
NamePart
Graduate School of Education
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
school
TypeOfResource
Text
Genre (authority = marcgt)
theses
OriginInfo
DateCreated (qualifier = exact)
2018
DateOther (qualifier = exact); (type = degree)
2018-01
CopyrightDate (encoding = w3cdtf); (qualifier = exact)
2018
Place
PlaceTerm (type = code)
xx
Language
LanguageTerm (authority = ISO639-2b); (type = code)
eng
Abstract (type = abstract)
Almost half of new teachers leave the profession or change teaching jobs in their first five years (Ingersoll & Smith, 2004).  Unfortunately, when turnover is high, students suffer because they learn from inexperienced or unqualified teachers (Sutcher, Darling-Hammond & Carver-Thomas, 2016). However, to improve teacher quality, schools should invest in induction.  As of 2000, 80% of schools have implemented induction programs that attempt to provide support through mentoring, collaboration, and/or workshops (Ingersoll & Smith, 2004). At a suburban middle school, turnover has led to the development of an induction program with more interventions. Utilizing Situated Learning Theory, this case study sought to evaluate whether the induction program addressed the challenges first, second, and third-year teachers faced.  Data collection included transcripts from semi-structured interviews and one-legged interviews, in addition to observational write-ups, written artifacts, field notes, and survey results. The findings indicated:       Teachers felt supported, although they struggled to articulate how they were assisted.       First-year teachers struggled with management, formative assessment, school procedures, and curriculum.  While they sought out mentors, curriculum teams, supervisors, and expertise from workshops, some still had difficulties with school procedures and curriculum interpretation.       Second-year teachers struggled with curriculum, planning for special education classes, and pressures to perform.  While they consulted with mentors and curriculum teams, they still had difficulty lesson planning.       Third-year teachers had fewer struggles and focused on better meeting the needs of students.       Peer-observations, mentoring relationships, and evaluative feedback were perceived to be the most effective induction supports.  Other supports were also identified as effective, although teachers acknowledged areas for improvement. After compiling the findings, recommendations include:       Expanding the selection criteria for mentors.       Providing a basic overview of school procedures during new teacher training.       Providing summer time for mentors and mentees to peruse the curriculum.       Shortening the duration between initial and follow-up workshops.       Creating more opportunities for peer-observations.       Encouraging grade-level departmental teams to develop norms.       Engaging in reflective dialogue as part of curriculum teamwork.       Establishing monthly check-ins with first-year teachers. Overall, it is perceived that adherence to the recommendations could improve retention efforts and facilitate teacher development.
Subject (authority = RUETD)
Topic
Teacher Leadership
RelatedItem (type = host)
TitleInfo
Title
Rutgers University Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Identifier (type = RULIB)
ETD
Identifier
ETD_8537
PhysicalDescription
Form (authority = gmd)
electronic resource
InternetMediaType
application/pdf
InternetMediaType
text/xml
Extent
1 online resource (viii, 156 p. : ill.)
Note (type = degree)
Ed.D.
Note (type = bibliography)
Includes bibliographical references
Subject (authority = ETD-LCSH)
Topic
Teacher turnover
Note (type = statement of responsibility)
by Jonathan Medina
RelatedItem (type = host)
TitleInfo
Title
Graduate School of Education Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Identifier (type = local)
rucore10001500001
Location
PhysicalLocation (authority = marcorg); (displayLabel = Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey)
NjNbRU
Identifier (type = doi)
doi:10.7282/T33R0X17
Genre (authority = ExL-Esploro)
ETD doctoral
Back to the top

Rights

RightsDeclaration (ID = rulibRdec0006)
The author owns the copyright to this work.
RightsHolder (type = personal)
Name
FamilyName
Medina
GivenName
Jonathan
Role
Copyright Holder
RightsEvent
Type
Permission or license
DateTime (encoding = w3cdtf); (qualifier = exact); (point = start)
2017-11-14 22:10:43
AssociatedEntity
Name
Jonathan Medina
Role
Copyright holder
Affiliation
Rutgers University. Graduate School of Education
AssociatedObject
Type
License
Name
Author Agreement License
Detail
I hereby grant to the Rutgers University Libraries and to my school the non-exclusive right to archive, reproduce and distribute my thesis or dissertation, in whole or in part, and/or my abstract, in whole or in part, in and from an electronic format, subject to the release date subsequently stipulated in this submittal form and approved by my school. I represent and stipulate that the thesis or dissertation and its abstract are my original work, that they do not infringe or violate any rights of others, and that I make these grants as the sole owner of the rights to my thesis or dissertation and its abstract. I represent that I have obtained written permissions, when necessary, from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis or dissertation and will supply copies of such upon request by my school. I acknowledge that RU ETD and my school will not distribute my thesis or dissertation or its abstract if, in their reasonable judgment, they believe all such rights have not been secured. I acknowledge that I retain ownership rights to the copyright of my work. I also retain the right to use all or part of this thesis or dissertation in future works, such as articles or books.
RightsEvent
DateTime (encoding = w3cdtf); (qualifier = exact); (point = start)
2018-01-31
DateTime (encoding = w3cdtf); (qualifier = exact); (point = end)
2018-08-02
Type
Embargo
Detail
Access to this PDF has been restricted at the author's request. It will be publicly available after August 2nd, 2018.
Copyright
Status
Copyright protected
Availability
Status
Open
Reason
Permission or license
Back to the top

Technical

RULTechMD (ID = TECHNICAL1)
ContentModel
ETD
OperatingSystem (VERSION = 5.1)
windows xp
CreatingApplication
Version
1.4
ApplicationName
Mac OS X 10.12.6 Quartz PDFContext
DateCreated (point = end); (encoding = w3cdtf); (qualifier = exact)
2017-12-14T03:22:17
DateCreated (point = end); (encoding = w3cdtf); (qualifier = exact)
2017-12-14T03:22:17
Back to the top
Version 8.5.5
Rutgers University Libraries - Copyright ©2024