Staff View
As Equal as Others? Rethinking Access to Discrimination Law

Descriptive

TypeOfResource
Text
TitleInfo
Title
As Equal as Others? Rethinking Access to Discrimination Law
Name (authority = orcid); (authorityURI = http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/identifiers/orcid.html); (type = personal); (valueURI = http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5128-6983)
NamePart (type = family)
Jenoff
NamePart (type = given)
Pam
Role
RoleTerm (authority = marcrt); (type = text)
author
Affiliation
Dean's Office (School of Law-Camden), Rutgers University
Name (authority = RutgersOrg-Department); (type = corporate)
NamePart
Dean's Office (School of Law-Camden)
Name (authority = RutgersOrg-School); (type = corporate)
NamePart
School of Law-Camden
Genre (authority = RULIB-FS)
Article, Non-refereed
Genre (authority = NISO JAV)
Version of Record (VoR)
OriginInfo
DateIssued (encoding = w3cdtf); (keyDate = yes); (qualifier = exact)
2013
Abstract (type = Abstract)
The purpose of employment discrimination law is to ensure fair and equal conditions in the workplace by preventing and remedying differential treatment based on certain protected characteristics, such as race, sex, and age. However, the federal anti-discrimination claiming system as presently constructed cannot achieve this mandate. The current system excludes close to one-fifth of the American workforce outright, and prevents even greater numbers of individuals from seeking redress for reasons unrelated to the merits of their claims. Stringent statutory requisites as to covered employers, administrative exhaustion, and the limitations period create barriers to access that not only prevent individuals from obtaining relief but permit discrimination to persist on a systemic level, hobbling realization of the anti-discrimination mandate. Thus, there is a fundamental tension between the broad aspirations of anti-discrimination law and the narrow constraints of the claiming system intended to enforce it.

Recent scholarship in the employment discrimination area has focused upon the structure of discrimination claims, i.e., whether the required elements of proof and burden-shifting framework are effective in addressing racism, sexism and other biases in the workplace, or whether a new, more fluid schema is required to capture the complexities of modern prejudice and its many manifestations. These articles do not speak to the more fundamental question of access to employment discrimination law.

This Article argues that there are costs associated with excluding people from coverage, including significantly diminishing the ability of discrimination law to eliminate discrimination. The Article shows how most of the arguments used for limiting the reach of employment law have never been substantiated, have been diminished by changing circumstances, or can be alleviated by altering the statutory regimes in important ways.

This Article breaks new ground by identifying the conflict between the broad goals of employment discrimination law and the limited protections of the anti-discrimination claiming system, and proposing bold systemic restructuring to widen access, while taking into account countervailing concerns such as overburdening and cost. Part I examines the evolution of the federal employment statutes. Part II considers the nature of the barriers to access, their merits as well as the problems they create.

Finally, Part III re-envisions the requirements of the anti-discrimination claiming system and offers a proposal whereby: (1) all employees would be covered by the federal anti-discrimination statutes and given access to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, which would have adjudicative, rather than merely investigative, authority over claims; (2) individuals employed by larger companies would be permitted to opt out of the EEOC process and proceed directly to federal court; and (3) individuals bringing claims in either forum would be given a minimum two-year statute of limitations in which to do so. These reforms would better achieve the goal of anti-discrimination law by providing protection to a wider spectrum of individuals and claims, while enabling the system to operate more effectively.
Language
LanguageTerm (authority = ISO 639-3:2007); (type = text)
English
PhysicalDescription
InternetMediaType
application/pdf
Extent
43 p.
Extension
DescriptiveEvent
Type
Citation
DateTime (encoding = w3cdtf)
2013
AssociatedObject
Name
University of Cincinnati Law Review
Type
Journal
Relationship
Has part
Detail
85-126
Identifier (type = volume and issue)
81(1)
Reference (type = url)
https://scholarship.law.uc.edu/uclr/vol81/iss1/2/
RelatedItem (type = host)
TitleInfo
Title
Jenoff, Pam
Identifier (type = local)
rucore30243500001
Location
PhysicalLocation (authority = marcorg); (displayLabel = Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey)
NjNbRU
Identifier (type = doi)
doi:10.7282/T3XG9VDF
Genre (authority = ExL-Esploro)
Journal Article
Back to the top

Rights

RightsDeclaration (AUTHORITY = FS); (ID = rulibRdec0004); (TYPE = [FS] statement #1)
Copyright for scholarly resources published in RUcore is retained by the copyright holder. By virtue of its appearance in this open access medium, you are free to use this resource, with proper attribution, in educational and other non-commercial settings. Other uses, such as reproduction or republication, may require the permission of the copyright holder.
Copyright
Status
Copyright protected
Availability
Status
Open
Reason
Permission or license
Note
“Brought to you for free and open access by University of Cincinnati College of Law Scholarship and Publications.”
RightsEvent
Type
Permission or license
AssociatedObject
Type
License
Name
Sole author license v. 1
Detail
I hereby grant to Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (Rutgers) the non-exclusive right to retain, reproduce, and distribute the deposited work (Work) in whole or in part, in and from its electronic format, without fee. This agreement does not represent a transfer of copyright to Rutgers.Rutgers may make and keep more than one copy of the Work for purposes of security, backup, preservation, and access and may migrate the Work to any medium or format for the purpose of preservation and access in the future. Rutgers will not make any alteration, other than as allowed by this agreement, to the Work.I represent and warrant to Rutgers that the Work is my original work. I also represent that the Work does not, to the best of my knowledge, infringe or violate any rights of others.I further represent and warrant that I have obtained all necessary rights to permit Rutgers to reproduce and distribute the Work and that any third-party owned content is clearly identified and acknowledged within the Work.By granting this license, I acknowledge that I have read and agreed to the terms of this agreement and all related RUcore and Rutgers policies.
Back to the top

Technical

RULTechMD (ID = TECHNICAL1)
ContentModel
Document
CreatingApplication
Version
1.5
DateCreated (point = end); (encoding = w3cdtf); (qualifier = exact)
2013-11-01T18:39:43
DateCreated (point = end); (encoding = w3cdtf); (qualifier = exact)
2018-04-05T14:10:19
ApplicationName
SPDF
Back to the top
Version 8.3.13
Rutgers University Libraries - Copyright ©2020