The purpose of this mixed methods study was to identify potential benefits and gaps in an academic-based preceptor education program offered to long-term care facilities in New Jersey. Preceptors are experienced nurses who provide guidance, support and instruction to new nurses transitioning from student to professional. Through an online survey and individual interviews, preceptors who participated in the program reflected on to what extent and in what ways the program impacted their understanding of key concepts critical to the preceptor role, as well as their ability to effectively apply these concepts in the work setting. Informed by Rogers’ Diffusion of Innovation framework, the data were also analyzed to determine if potential benefits and gaps in understanding and applying preceptor concepts in the work setting differed by innovator category. All preceptors who attended the preceptor education program were invited to participate in the study. Of 55 participants, a total of 32 completed surveys. A stratified random sample was employed to obtain representation from each innovator category for the interviews. A total of 15 preceptors participated in the interview process. Survey data analysis showed that respondents as a whole rated both their understanding and application as highest for the feedback and adult learning concepts. Analysis by individual innovator category indicated that the Early Adopter (EA) category had the highest means for understanding and application. The EAs rated feedback as the highest concept for understanding and application. Interviews identified common program benefits of discussion groups and use of program materials as scaffolds. Challenge or gap themes included amount of course materials and in-person class, role conflict and lack of continued support from the program. Analysis by innovator category identified introducing preceptor concepts to others as being a theme specific to the Early Adopter and Innovator categories. While the challenge themes of in-person class and lack of continued support were common to all three innovator categories, role conflict was not present in the Innovator group. Based on study findings, recommendations for the preceptor education program revisions include increasing active learning strategies, converting theory to an online component, and developing a PD refresher program.
Subject (authority = RUETD)
Topic
Design of Learning Contexts
RelatedItem (type = host)
TitleInfo
Title
Rutgers University Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Identifier (type = RULIB)
ETD
Identifier
ETD_8909
PhysicalDescription
Form (authority = gmd)
electronic resource
InternetMediaType
application/pdf
InternetMediaType
text/xml
Extent
1 online resource (xi, 132 p. : ill.)
Note (type = degree)
Ed.D.
Note (type = bibliography)
Includes bibliographical references
Subject (authority = ETD-LCSH)
Topic
Long-term care facilities--New Jersey
Note (type = statement of responsibility)
by Nancy Bohnarczyk
RelatedItem (type = host)
TitleInfo
Title
Graduate School of Education Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Identifier (type = local)
rucore10001500001
Location
PhysicalLocation (authority = marcorg); (displayLabel = Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey)
I hereby grant to the Rutgers University Libraries and to my school the non-exclusive right to archive, reproduce and distribute my thesis or dissertation, in whole or in part, and/or my abstract, in whole or in part, in and from an electronic format, subject to the release date subsequently stipulated in this submittal form and approved by my school. I represent and stipulate that the thesis or dissertation and its abstract are my original work, that they do not infringe or violate any rights of others, and that I make these grants as the sole owner of the rights to my thesis or dissertation and its abstract. I represent that I have obtained written permissions, when necessary, from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis or dissertation and will supply copies of such upon request by my school. I acknowledge that RU ETD and my school will not distribute my thesis or dissertation or its abstract if, in their reasonable judgment, they believe all such rights have not been secured. I acknowledge that I retain ownership rights to the copyright of my work. I also retain the right to use all or part of this thesis or dissertation in future works, such as articles or books.