Staff View
Improving literacy

Descriptive

TitleInfo
Title
Improving literacy
SubTitle
pairing affective with cognitive interventions
Name (type = personal)
NamePart (type = family)
Mattheiss
NamePart (type = given)
Samantha Rachael
NamePart (type = date)
1983-
DisplayForm
Samantha Rachael Mattheiss
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
author
Name (type = personal)
NamePart (type = family)
Tricomi
NamePart (type = given)
Elizabeth
DisplayForm
Elizabeth Tricomi
Affiliation
Advisory Committee
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
chair
Name (type = corporate)
NamePart
Rutgers University
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
degree grantor
Name (type = corporate)
NamePart
Graduate School - Newark
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
school
TypeOfResource
Text
Genre (authority = marcgt)
theses
OriginInfo
DateCreated (qualifier = exact)
2018
DateOther (qualifier = exact); (type = degree)
2018-05
CopyrightDate (encoding = w3cdtf); (qualifier = exact)
2018
Place
PlaceTerm (type = code)
xx
Language
LanguageTerm (authority = ISO639-2b); (type = code)
eng
Abstract (type = abstract)
Reading is a critical skill, with lack of reading proficiency related to poor outcomes including poverty, unemployment, and incarceration rates. Poor reading skill can occur for multiple reasons. Research on the brain basis of reading problems typically focuses on issues with letter-sound mappings, but much less work has been done on the equally critical issues of what kinds of feedback are most effective for learning these mappings; and what other kinds of challenges, including environmental ones, can disrupt this process. In particular, stressors prevalent in low-income urban communities, such as exposure to violence, affect neural activity, thereby interfering with the cognitive processes involved in learning. Despite the prevalence of violence in urban communities and coinciding low literacy rates, research assessing the neural effects of violence, and examining specific reading interventions targeted at these neural differences, is quite limited. The first goal of the following research was to determine what makes for effective orthography-phonology (spelling-sound) training. Novel letter strings are trained with Elaborative Feedback, which we expected to promote cognitive processing by pairing content-specific information with an affective component. In Study 1, novel letter strings trained with Elaborative Feedback, compared to feedback containing only content-specific information (Content Feedback) and to that containing only affective information (Positive Feedback), resulted in the highest performance accuracy. This Elaborative Feedback condition was also associated with activation in the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC), implicated in reward-processing, as well as neural regions implicated in orthography-phonology mapping, such as the posterior middle and superior temporal and supramarginal gyri. Therefore this study revealed both which type of feedback was most effective for learning novel word forms, and the neural mechanisms behind its effectiveness. The second goal was to enhance the effectiveness of orthography-phonology training specifically for individuals exposed to urban stressors. Study 2 revealed differential resting state functional connectivity (rsFc) by childhood exposure to violence among neural regions implicated in both the affective and cognitive components of feedback processing. Individuals exposed to high levels of violence in childhood had decreased rsFc between the vmPFC and the amygdala, as well as the right dlPFC and other neural regions implicated in working memory, such as the intraparietal sulcus (IPS). Study 3 tested whether exposure to violence during childhood and reading ability moderate the effectiveness of feedback type. Individuals with high reading ability and who were exposed to increasing levels of violence during childhood benefited more from EF. This research provides cognitive neuroscientific evidence that could ultimately inform the integration of affective with cognitive skills in urban schools, possibly helping to improve performance and close the achievement gap.
Subject (authority = RUETD)
Topic
Psychology
Subject (authority = ETD-LCSH)
Topic
Literacy
RelatedItem (type = host)
TitleInfo
Title
Rutgers University Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Identifier (type = RULIB)
ETD
Identifier
ETD_8971
PhysicalDescription
Form (authority = gmd)
electronic resource
InternetMediaType
application/pdf
InternetMediaType
text/xml
Extent
1 online resource (x, 161 p. : ill.)
Note (type = degree)
Ph.D.
Note (type = bibliography)
Includes bibliographical references
Note (type = statement of responsibility)
by Samantha Rachael Mattheiss
RelatedItem (type = host)
TitleInfo
Title
Graduate School - Newark Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Identifier (type = local)
rucore10002600001
Location
PhysicalLocation (authority = marcorg); (displayLabel = Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey)
NjNbRU
Identifier (type = doi)
doi:10.7282/T3JM2F1V
Genre (authority = ExL-Esploro)
ETD doctoral
Back to the top

Rights

RightsDeclaration (ID = rulibRdec0006)
The author owns the copyright to this work.
RightsHolder (type = personal)
Name
FamilyName
Mattheiss
GivenName
Samantha
MiddleName
Rachael
Role
Copyright Holder
RightsEvent
Type
Permission or license
DateTime (encoding = w3cdtf); (qualifier = exact); (point = start)
2018-04-27 15:48:49
AssociatedEntity
Name
Samantha Mattheiss
Role
Copyright holder
Affiliation
Rutgers University. Graduate School - Newark
AssociatedObject
Type
License
Name
Author Agreement License
Detail
I hereby grant to the Rutgers University Libraries and to my school the non-exclusive right to archive, reproduce and distribute my thesis or dissertation, in whole or in part, and/or my abstract, in whole or in part, in and from an electronic format, subject to the release date subsequently stipulated in this submittal form and approved by my school. I represent and stipulate that the thesis or dissertation and its abstract are my original work, that they do not infringe or violate any rights of others, and that I make these grants as the sole owner of the rights to my thesis or dissertation and its abstract. I represent that I have obtained written permissions, when necessary, from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis or dissertation and will supply copies of such upon request by my school. I acknowledge that RU ETD and my school will not distribute my thesis or dissertation or its abstract if, in their reasonable judgment, they believe all such rights have not been secured. I acknowledge that I retain ownership rights to the copyright of my work. I also retain the right to use all or part of this thesis or dissertation in future works, such as articles or books.
Copyright
Status
Copyright protected
Availability
Status
Open
Reason
Permission or license
Back to the top

Technical

RULTechMD (ID = TECHNICAL1)
ContentModel
ETD
OperatingSystem (VERSION = 5.1)
windows xp
CreatingApplication
Version
1.7
ApplicationName
Microsoft® Word 2016
DateCreated (point = end); (encoding = w3cdtf); (qualifier = exact)
2018-05-07T11:19:04
DateCreated (point = end); (encoding = w3cdtf); (qualifier = exact)
2018-05-07T11:19:04
Back to the top
Version 8.5.5
Rutgers University Libraries - Copyright ©2024