For centuries, alluvial gold extraction and plantation labor have been central sources of income for people living in Norte del Cauca. Located in Western Colombia where the Andes open up to the Cauca River Valley, scholars have described this region as a landscape of proletarization, commoditization, and urbanization. Narratives that oscillate between teleological images of agrarian and urban transition on the one hand, and essentialized views of resistance and autonomy on the other, have long characterized social scientific studies of the region. This dissertation critically examines these narratives and shows how they have foreclosed important political and theoretical debates. This ethnography is thus not the tale of how enslaved populations became “free peasants” and later plantation and factory workers, or even how they became urban dwellers as promised in most modernization narratives. Nor is it one where people find their “ancestral” identity and belonging though concerted action against oppressive structures. Drawing on twenty-four months of anthropological fieldwork and archival study conducted between 2011-2016, the dissertation diverges from these views stressing the stories of mutual constitution and often overlapping and ambivalent paths I encountered in this land of gold and sugarcane. There is no doubt that there is little to glorify about the history of colonialism, state formation, and capitalist development in this region. However, I argue that people who are imagined by activists of the black ethnic organizing in Colombia, and the global peasant and environmental movements to be dreaming with alternative forms of political, economic and ecological becoming, are also dreaming with state recognition, infrastructure improvements, entrepreneurial success, and development projects. Moving along the upper Cauca river with its hydroelectric dam and gold mines, and across the Pan-American highway with its sugarcane plantations and industrial areas, this dissertation develops an analytic of entanglement in order to examine how historically racialized production relations, long-standing extractive practices, and an emergent entrepreneur subjectivities exist alongside “ancestral live-visions” of well-being and autonomy, and notions of “traditional” belonging and production mobilized by small farmers, miners, and rural workers. I argue that what is left of the racialized and extractive labor regimes, is not just a history of proletarization and destruction of the environment, but also the important experience of people who have sought to belong to the region and have come to know themselves precisely through inhabiting and working theses same landscape of exploitation and extraction.
I hereby grant to the Rutgers University Libraries and to my school the non-exclusive right to archive, reproduce and distribute my thesis or dissertation, in whole or in part, and/or my abstract, in whole or in part, in and from an electronic format, subject to the release date subsequently stipulated in this submittal form and approved by my school. I represent and stipulate that the thesis or dissertation and its abstract are my original work, that they do not infringe or violate any rights of others, and that I make these grants as the sole owner of the rights to my thesis or dissertation and its abstract. I represent that I have obtained written permissions, when necessary, from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis or dissertation and will supply copies of such upon request by my school. I acknowledge that RU ETD and my school will not distribute my thesis or dissertation or its abstract if, in their reasonable judgment, they believe all such rights have not been secured. I acknowledge that I retain ownership rights to the copyright of my work. I also retain the right to use all or part of this thesis or dissertation in future works, such as articles or books.