Staff View
Bringing the underground economy to light

Descriptive

TitleInfo
Title
Bringing the underground economy to light
SubTitle
testing a revised model of institutional anomie theory
Name (type = personal)
NamePart (type = family)
Kurti
NamePart (type = given)
Marin
DisplayForm
Marin Kurti
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
author
Name (type = personal)
NamePart (type = family)
Rengifo
NamePart (type = given)
Andres
DisplayForm
Andres Rengifo
Affiliation
Advisory Committee
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
chair
Name (type = personal)
NamePart (type = family)
Apel
NamePart (type = given)
Robert
DisplayForm
Robert Apel
Affiliation
Advisory Committee
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
internal member
Name (type = personal)
NamePart (type = family)
Chin
NamePart (type = given)
Ko-lin
DisplayForm
Ko-lin Chin
Affiliation
Advisory Committee
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
internal member
Name (type = personal)
NamePart (type = family)
Rosenfeld
NamePart (type = given)
Richard
DisplayForm
Richard Rosenfeld
Affiliation
Advisory Committee
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
outside member
Name (type = corporate)
NamePart
Rutgers University
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
degree grantor
Name (type = corporate)
NamePart
Graduate School - Newark
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
school
TypeOfResource
Text
Genre (authority = marcgt)
theses
OriginInfo
DateCreated (qualifier = exact)
2019
DateOther (qualifier = exact); (type = degree)
2019-01
Place
PlaceTerm (type = code)
xx
CopyrightDate (encoding = w3cdtf)
2019
Language
LanguageTerm (authority = ISO639-2b); (type = code)
eng
Abstract (type = abstract)
Institutional anomie theory (IAT) contends that crime is the result of interplay between culture that values material success (American Dream), and an institutional imbalance, where the economy is overvalued in relation to the polity, family, and education (Messner & Rosenfeld, 2012). Scholars have measured this imbalance at the level of countries or states via the relative strength of the formal economy (e.g., Gross Domestic Product and Gini index of inequality). However, by focusing solely on formal, aggregate measures it neglects the true nature and size of the broader economy that encompasses the informal (e.g., garage sales, day labor, lemonade stands) and illegal economy (e.g., drug sales, sex work, gambling). This lack of specification may underestimate the extent of the institutional imbalance, whose processes are more easily observed and varied at the neighborhood level.

This dissertation sought to advance Messner and Rosenfeld’s (1994) institutional anomie theory by broadening the economy to include, the formal, informal and illegal economy. It also examined this reconfiguration at the neighborhood level using a representative sample of block groups in New York City (n=107). Preliminary examination of this theoretical expansion was tested combining administrative data (census, police, and city records) with primary data collection (e.g., systematic observations and the collection of littered artifacts collected from street segments that were aggregated to the block group level). Between late August and October 2016, trained raters made systematic social observations (SSO) and collected litter artifacts in all of the streets nested within the block groups. Walking on opposite sides of the street and in pairs, raters counted the number of street behaviors, postings and litter artifacts that pointed to the presence and strength of the informal, illegal economy and the American Dream: including: (1) advertisements for “off-the-books” jobs; (2) illegal transactions in public spaces (e.g., drug sales, gambling, prostitution); (3) litter drug artifacts (e.g. small zip lock bags, synthetic marijuana wrappers, ‘blunt’ wrappers, syringes, crack pipes, glassine envelopes); and (4) public advertisements for free and paid services that are visual cues for the American Dream.

Overall, I find partial support for the theory. The formal economy was related to robbery incidents at the neighborhood level. However, there were no significant association between the informal and the illegal economy and robbery counts. Some of the reasons why this study yielded non-significant findings include the difficulties associated with measuring concepts. I provide additional considerations for a theory retest at a larger unit of analysis (county or borough).
Subject (authority = RUETD)
Topic
Criminal Justice
Subject (authority = ETD-LCSH)
Topic
Criminology--United States
Subject (authority = ETD-LCSH)
Topic
Social structure--United States
Subject (authority = ETD-LCSH)
Topic
Anomy
RelatedItem (type = host)
TitleInfo
Title
Rutgers University Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Identifier (type = RULIB)
ETD
Identifier
ETD_9373
PhysicalDescription
Form (authority = gmd)
electronic resource
InternetMediaType
application/pdf
InternetMediaType
text/xml
Extent
1 online resource (278 pages) : illustrations
Note (type = degree)
Ph.D.
Note (type = bibliography)
Includes bibliographical references
Note (type = statement of responsibility)
by Marin K. Kurti
RelatedItem (type = host)
TitleInfo
Title
Graduate School - Newark Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Identifier (type = local)
rucore10002600001
Location
PhysicalLocation (authority = marcorg); (displayLabel = Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey)
NjNbRU
Identifier (type = doi)
doi:10.7282/t3-8y7a-s814
Genre (authority = ExL-Esploro)
ETD doctoral
Back to the top

Rights

RightsDeclaration (ID = rulibRdec0006)
The author owns the copyright to this work.
RightsHolder (type = personal)
Name
FamilyName
Kurti
GivenName
Marin
Role
Copyright Holder
RightsEvent
Type
Permission or license
DateTime (encoding = w3cdtf); (qualifier = exact); (point = start)
2018-11-26 14:27:13
AssociatedEntity
Name
Marin Kurti
Role
Copyright holder
Affiliation
Rutgers University. Graduate School - Newark
AssociatedObject
Type
License
Name
Author Agreement License
Detail
I hereby grant to the Rutgers University Libraries and to my school the non-exclusive right to archive, reproduce and distribute my thesis or dissertation, in whole or in part, and/or my abstract, in whole or in part, in and from an electronic format, subject to the release date subsequently stipulated in this submittal form and approved by my school. I represent and stipulate that the thesis or dissertation and its abstract are my original work, that they do not infringe or violate any rights of others, and that I make these grants as the sole owner of the rights to my thesis or dissertation and its abstract. I represent that I have obtained written permissions, when necessary, from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis or dissertation and will supply copies of such upon request by my school. I acknowledge that RU ETD and my school will not distribute my thesis or dissertation or its abstract if, in their reasonable judgment, they believe all such rights have not been secured. I acknowledge that I retain ownership rights to the copyright of my work. I also retain the right to use all or part of this thesis or dissertation in future works, such as articles or books.
Copyright
Status
Copyright protected
Availability
Status
Open
Reason
Permission or license
Back to the top

Technical

RULTechMD (ID = TECHNICAL1)
ContentModel
ETD
OperatingSystem (VERSION = 5.1)
windows xp
CreatingApplication
Version
1.5
DateCreated (point = end); (encoding = w3cdtf); (qualifier = exact)
2018-11-29T10:40:32
DateCreated (point = end); (encoding = w3cdtf); (qualifier = exact)
2018-11-29T10:40:32
ApplicationName
Microsoft® Word 2013
Back to the top
Version 8.5.5
Rutgers University Libraries - Copyright ©2024