LanguageTerm (authority = ISO 639-3:2007); (type = text)
English
Abstract
According to theories of government and market failure, nonprofit organizations play a critical role in delivering public goods and social services. For achieving important social missions, there are multiple challenges (such as unstable government resources, limited amounts of donation, and increasing market competition) that necessitate the need for commercialization within the nonprofit sector. Recently, commercialization in the sector has evolved into the establishment of an innovative type of organization—the social enterprise. Though early scholars have raised concerns regarding nonprofit commercialization and enterprising, there is insufficient empirical evidence to make definitive claims regarding the relationship between commercialization and nonprofit organizations with social missions.
Thus, this dissertation seeks to add to the literature and answer the questions: What are the costs and benefits of commercialization in nonprofit organizations? Particularly, how, if at all, does commercialization influence public perceptions of nonprofit legitimacy? And, how, if at all, does commercialization influence a nonprofit’s ability to garner financial resources? Two empirical studies are developed focusing on two different types of nonprofit industries. The first looks at profit-seeking intentions in the daycare and recycling industries, while the second looks at actual profit generation from commercialization in higher education.
The examination starts with an online survey experiment, which tests the perceptual reactions of people toward social enterprises. Research suggests that people’s perceptions of an organization will largely determine whether they are willing to interact with it; and, given that the public is likely to be less familiar with social enterprises, information about the sector will likely act as an important cognitive heuristic for people to evaluate social enterprises. The study illustrates how sector stereotypes influence how people perceive nonprofit and for-profit social enterprises. Results from the experiment show that there is a significant effect of sector stereotype on people’s perception and willingness to interact with the nonprofit or for-profit social enterprise, which can be explained by people’s psychological repugnancy against profit-seeking intentions.
The second study addresses how the capital market reacts to revenues from research commercialization in nonprofit universities. Nonprofit universities increasingly rely on the issuance of tax-exempt bonds to generate capital. Therefore, financial assessments of nonprofit universities by the capital market (measured by their credit rating) has a significant influence on the capacity of these organizations to borrow for their mission. Encouraged by government policy, universities are actively engaging into research commercialization activities such as technology transfer. Research commercialization might largely benefit universities’ credit ratings because it brings both pragmatic and moral legitimacy. The hypothesis is supported by evidence from pooled university data from 2007 to 2016.
Results from my dissertation raise new insights on the role of commercialization in the nonprofit sector. Overall, my dissertation helps to confirm the illegitimacy of commercialization in the social service market, and, it explores conditions that mitigate incompatibility between commercialization and social missions.
Subject (authority = local)
Topic
Public administration
Subject (authority = RUETD)
Topic
Public Administration (SPAA)
Subject (authority = LCSH)
Topic
Nonprofit organizations -- United States -- Finance
RelatedItem (type = host)
TitleInfo
Title
Rutgers University Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Identifier (type = RULIB)
ETD
Identifier
ETD_9856
PhysicalDescription
Form (authority = gmd)
InternetMediaType
application/pdf
InternetMediaType
text/xml
Extent
1 online resource (x, 99 pages) : illustrations
Note (type = degree)
Ph.D.
Note (type = bibliography)
Includes bibliographical references
RelatedItem (type = host)
TitleInfo
Title
Graduate School - Newark Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Identifier (type = local)
rucore10002600001
Location
PhysicalLocation (authority = marcorg); (displayLabel = Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey)
I hereby grant to the Rutgers University Libraries and to my school the non-exclusive right to archive, reproduce and distribute my thesis or dissertation, in whole or in part, and/or my abstract, in whole or in part, in and from an electronic format, subject to the release date subsequently stipulated in this submittal form and approved by my school. I represent and stipulate that the thesis or dissertation and its abstract are my original work, that they do not infringe or violate any rights of others, and that I make these grants as the sole owner of the rights to my thesis or dissertation and its abstract. I represent that I have obtained written permissions, when necessary, from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis or dissertation and will supply copies of such upon request by my school. I acknowledge that RU ETD and my school will not distribute my thesis or dissertation or its abstract if, in their reasonable judgment, they believe all such rights have not been secured. I acknowledge that I retain ownership rights to the copyright of my work. I also retain the right to use all or part of this thesis or dissertation in future works, such as articles or books.