Staff View
Surface tension: skin, disease, and visuality in third republic France

Descriptive

TitleInfo
Title
Surface tension: skin, disease, and visuality in third republic France
Name (type = personal)
NamePart (type = family)
Pierce
NamePart (type = given)
Kathleen
NamePart (type = date)
1989-
DisplayForm
Kathleen Pierce
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
author
Name (type = personal)
NamePart (type = family)
Sidlauskas
NamePart (type = given)
Susan
DisplayForm
Susan Sidlauskas
Affiliation
Advisory Committee
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
chair
Name (type = personal)
NamePart (type = family)
Brett-Smith
NamePart (type = given)
Sarah
DisplayForm
Sarah Brett-Smith
Affiliation
Advisory Committee
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
internal member
Name (type = personal)
NamePart (type = family)
Zervigon
NamePart (type = given)
Andres
DisplayForm
Andres Zervigon
Affiliation
Advisory Committee
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
internal member
Name (type = personal)
NamePart (type = family)
Hunter
NamePart (type = given)
Mary
DisplayForm
Mary Hunter
Affiliation
Advisory Committee
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
outside member
Name (type = corporate)
NamePart
Rutgers University
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
degree grantor
Name (type = corporate)
NamePart
School of Graduate Studies
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
school
TypeOfResource
Text
Genre (authority = marcgt)
theses
OriginInfo
DateCreated (encoding = w3cdtf); (qualifier = exact)
2019
DateOther (encoding = w3cdtf); (qualifier = exact); (type = degree)
2019-05
CopyrightDate (encoding = w3cdtf); (qualifier = exact)
2019
Language
LanguageTerm (authority = ISO 639-3:2007); (type = text)
English
Abstract (type = abstract)
This dissertation examines relationships between representations of diseased skin and the surface of modern painting in fin-de-siècle France. I frame my analysis through historically specific, interdisciplinary understandings of the surface and discourses of syphilis, whose equivocal relationship to the skin disrupted bodily boundaries and the certainty of medical vision. I study diverse objects—including dermatological illustrations, medical models, and vanguard painting—to excavate formal and historical links between visualizations of the body across medicine, public health, and modern painting. Demonstrating the value of interdisciplinary thinking across art and medicine, I argue for the broad cultural reach of medical articulations of the body. I thread Pablo Picasso’s 1907 Les Demoiselles d’Avignon through the dissertation as a potent example of this reach. Despite this painting’s canonical status, few scholars have considered its relationship to cultural spheres outside of art history. By juxtaposing the Demoiselles with dermatology’s visual culture, I reveal how both kinds of images evince fin-de-siècle surface tensions: the perforated skin of the syphilitic threatened the health of the individual, their family, and the French race while the splintered surface of the Demoiselles categorically challenged the representative role of painting. Through careful visual analysis, the close reading of primary sources, and archival research, and drawing on interdisciplinary scholarship, this dissertation argues for new historical links between the early twentieth-century avant-garde and Parisian medical institutions, but also elucidates historically specific modes of understanding the rise of the modernist surface.
Chapter one interrogates the visual culture of medical education to locate syphilis as a disruptor not only of bodily surface, but also of medical vision. To shore up this optical doubt, physicians represented syphilis through innumerable visual examples of idiosyncratic variation, visualizing the disease as an aggregate of separate, isolated body parts. I subsequently demonstrate parallels between medical image-makers’ increasing tendency to represent the body in parts and Cubism’s disarticulation of the body. Chapter two centers the fin-de-siècle trope of equating syphilis with the act of masking. I explore this phenomenon as it operates in popular visual culture, posters and postcards developed by public health officials, medical treatises, and the Demoiselles d’Avignon, paying particular attention to its intersection with gender and race. Chapter three homes in on a series of syphilis trials conducted on monkeys at the Institut Pasteur and illuminates the ways gender, race, and animality triangulate around syphilis’s tenuous relationship with visuality. It demonstrates significant connections between Picasso’s anarchist politics and critiques of experimental medicine and, subsequently, provides new touchstones for understanding the Demoiselles. My final chapter considers the use of spots in fin-de-siècle imagery, linking their all-encompassing presentation to the visual symptoms of syphilis and anxieties about the surface integrity of both bodies and art objects.
My project makes three key interventions within and without art history. First, I insist on careful, critical readings not only of canonical art objects, but also of medical imagery and material culture. These latter objects are often presented as uncomplicated illustrations of larger issues rather than the rich, multifaceted representations they constitute. By engaging deeply with these objects in conjunction with canonical art, I reveal new historical links between artistic and medical modes of visualizing the body. Second, my project historicizes the concept of surface. Scholarly debates about modern painting have privileged surface since the 1960s, yet few look beyond the bounds of art history to understand its ascendency in early twentieth-century painting. I contextualize this rise within rhizomatic outcroppings of surface-centric thinking across fields. Finally, the dissertation’s arguments further clarify the historical ties that bind disease, race, and gender. This intervention is essential given the ways medicine increasingly structures care around genetic predisposition, wherein categories like gender and race operate as quantifiable and biologically defined filters through which one can calculate medical risk. It thus seems crucial that those producing scientific knowledge understand that concepts such as objectivity have histories, and that bodies are not only biologically, but also socially inscribed. This dissertation contributes to this effort.
Subject (authority = local)
Topic
Modern painting
Subject (authority = RUETD)
Topic
Art History
Subject (authority = LCSH)
Topic
Syphilis in art
RelatedItem (type = host)
TitleInfo
Title
Rutgers University Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Identifier (type = RULIB)
ETD
Identifier
ETD_9791
PhysicalDescription
Form (authority = gmd)
InternetMediaType
application/pdf
InternetMediaType
text/xml
Extent
1 online resource (xiv, 351 pages) : illustrations
Note (type = degree)
Ph.D.
Note (type = bibliography)
Includes bibliographical references
Subject
Name (authority = LCNAF)
NamePart (type = personal)
Picasso, Pablo, 1881-1973. -- Demoiselles d'Avignon -- Criticism and interpretation
RelatedItem (type = host)
TitleInfo
Title
School of Graduate Studies Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Identifier (type = local)
rucore10001600001
Location
PhysicalLocation (authority = marcorg); (displayLabel = Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey)
NjNbRU
Identifier (type = doi)
doi:10.7282/t3-ks6v-dq21
Genre (authority = ExL-Esploro)
ETD doctoral
Back to the top

Rights

RightsDeclaration (ID = rulibRdec0006)
The author owns the copyright to this work.
RightsHolder (type = personal)
Name
FamilyName
Pierce
GivenName
Kathleen
Role
Copyright Holder
RightsEvent
Type
Permission or license
DateTime (encoding = w3cdtf); (point = start); (qualifier = exact)
2019-04-11 13:15:20
AssociatedEntity
Name
Kathleen Pierce
Role
Copyright holder
Affiliation
Rutgers University. School of Graduate Studies
AssociatedObject
Type
License
Name
Author Agreement License
Detail
I hereby grant to the Rutgers University Libraries and to my school the non-exclusive right to archive, reproduce and distribute my thesis or dissertation, in whole or in part, and/or my abstract, in whole or in part, in and from an electronic format, subject to the release date subsequently stipulated in this submittal form and approved by my school. I represent and stipulate that the thesis or dissertation and its abstract are my original work, that they do not infringe or violate any rights of others, and that I make these grants as the sole owner of the rights to my thesis or dissertation and its abstract. I represent that I have obtained written permissions, when necessary, from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis or dissertation and will supply copies of such upon request by my school. I acknowledge that RU ETD and my school will not distribute my thesis or dissertation or its abstract if, in their reasonable judgment, they believe all such rights have not been secured. I acknowledge that I retain ownership rights to the copyright of my work. I also retain the right to use all or part of this thesis or dissertation in future works, such as articles or books.
RightsEvent
Type
Embargo
DateTime (encoding = w3cdtf); (point = start)
2021-02-15
DateTime (encoding = w3cdtf); (point = end)
2025-02-15
Detail
Access to this PDF has been restricted at the author's request. It will be publicly available after February 15, 2025.
Copyright
Status
Copyright protected
Availability
Status
Open
Reason
Permission or license
Back to the top

Technical

RULTechMD (ID = TECHNICAL1)
ContentModel
ETD
OperatingSystem (VERSION = 5.1)
windows xp
CreatingApplication
Version
1.4
ApplicationName
macOS Version 10.14.3 (Build 18D109) Quartz PDFContext
DateCreated (point = end); (encoding = w3cdtf); (qualifier = exact)
2019-04-19T17:01:59
DateCreated (point = end); (encoding = w3cdtf); (qualifier = exact)
2019-04-19T17:01:59
Back to the top
Version 8.5.5
Rutgers University Libraries - Copyright ©2024