Staff View
Subjective rationalism in liberal arts mathematics

Descriptive

TitleInfo
Title
Subjective rationalism in liberal arts mathematics
Name (type = personal)
NamePart (type = family)
Wenger
NamePart (type = given)
Gary A.
NamePart (type = date)
1975-
DisplayForm
Gary A. Wenger
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
author
Name (type = personal)
NamePart (type = family)
Battey
NamePart (type = given)
Daniel
DisplayForm
Daniel Battey
Affiliation
Advisory Committee
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
chair
Name (type = personal)
NamePart (type = family)
Weber
NamePart (type = given)
Keith
DisplayForm
Keith Weber
Affiliation
Advisory Committee
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
internal member
Name (type = personal)
NamePart (type = family)
Rubin
NamePart (type = given)
Beth
DisplayForm
Beth Rubin
Affiliation
Advisory Committee
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
internal member
Name (type = personal)
NamePart (type = family)
Clear
NamePart (type = given)
Todd
DisplayForm
Todd Clear
Affiliation
Advisory Committee
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
outside member
Name (type = corporate)
NamePart
Rutgers University
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
degree grantor
Name (type = corporate)
NamePart
School of Graduate Studies
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
school
TypeOfResource
Text
Genre (authority = marcgt)
theses
OriginInfo
DateCreated (encoding = w3cdtf); (qualifier = exact)
2019
DateOther (encoding = w3cdtf); (qualifier = exact); (type = degree)
2019-05
CopyrightDate (encoding = w3cdtf); (qualifier = exact)
2019
Language
LanguageTerm (authority = ISO 639-3:2007); (type = text)
English
Abstract
The majority of American college students pursue a degree outside one of the STEM fields (US News & World Report, 2015), yet these same students must still complete a minimum level of coursework in mathematics for graduation. The intent of liberal arts math courses is to help students who are majoring in one of the liberal arts successfully meet these mathematics proficiency requirements. Colleges offer liberal arts math courses to students who are unlikely to need specialized math skills, instead aiming to improve functional mathematical literacy, provide a sample of practical applications and problem-solving techniques, and to develop an overall appreciation of mathematics. Liberal arts mathematics, and the subset of quantitative literacy courses, are presently characterized by a diversity of curricular offerings with an absence of consistently defined core concepts (Dingman & Madison, 2010). Furthermore, many of these programs fail to support the overarching mission of a liberal arts education – to literally liberate the mind and prepare individuals for fully-informed and active citizenship, across multiple disciplines (King, Brown, Lindsay, & VanHecke, 2007; Stanton, 1987). The first part of this study explores three prototypical textbooks for liberal arts mathematics. The textbooks are examined for their commonalities, strengths and weaknesses, and the extent to which they facilitate the objectives of a liberal arts education. The second part of this study summarizes a progressive new curriculum for liberal arts mathematics, founded upon the notion of threshold concepts (Meyer & Land, 2003), and developed in the context of social justice. The practice of deductive reasoning, while attending to matters of probability and personal preference, collectively outline a new theory of subjective rationalism in this paper. The third part of this study presents a retrospective analysis on the creation and evolution of the new curriculum. This research explored the idea that the optimal set of math skills is neither computational nor algorithmic, rather, it lies within the realm of mathematical reasoning – the essence of which is founded upon key principles in logic and probability. The identification and cultivation of threshold concepts in mathematical reasoning offers to bring clarity and consistency into the field of liberal arts mathematics. This research is significant because a liberal arts math program may be a student’s only postsecondary math course and the last opportunity to develop a useful set of math tools. Research data in this retrospective analysis spans five years across secondary and postsecondary implementations of the evolving curriculum; data include multiple iterations of the curriculum and the research practitioner’s field notes reflecting on instructional interventions and classroom discourse, as well as reflections on students’ performances with written assessments.
Subject (authority = local)
Topic
Liberal Arts
Subject (authority = RUETD)
Topic
Education
Subject (authority = ETD-LCSH)
Topic
Education, Humanistic
Subject (authority = ETD-LCSH)
Topic
Mathematics -- Study and teaching (Higher)
Subject (authority = ETD-LCSH)
Topic
Curriculum evaluation
Subject (authority = local)
Topic
Subjective rationalism
Subject (authority = local)
Topic
Quantitative reasoning
RelatedItem (type = host)
TitleInfo
Title
Rutgers University Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Identifier (type = RULIB)
ETD
Identifier
ETD_9627
PhysicalDescription
Form (authority = gmd)
InternetMediaType
application/pdf
InternetMediaType
text/xml
Extent
1 online resource (vii, 179 pages) : illustrations
Note (type = degree)
Ph.D.
Note (type = bibliography)
Includes bibliographical references
RelatedItem (type = host)
TitleInfo
Title
School of Graduate Studies Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Identifier (type = local)
rucore10001600001
Location
PhysicalLocation (authority = marcorg); (displayLabel = Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey)
NjNbRU
Identifier (type = doi)
doi:10.7282/t3-43qy-wj13
Genre (authority = ExL-Esploro)
ETD doctoral
Back to the top

Rights

RightsDeclaration (ID = rulibRdec0006)
The author owns the copyright to this work.
RightsHolder (type = personal)
Name
FamilyName
Wenger
GivenName
Gary
MiddleName
A.
Role
Copyright Holder
RightsEvent
Type
Permission or license
DateTime (encoding = w3cdtf); (qualifier = exact); (point = start)
2019-03-29 12:44:45
AssociatedEntity
Name
Gary A. Wenger
Role
Copyright holder
Affiliation
Rutgers University. School of Graduate Studies
AssociatedObject
Type
License
Name
Author Agreement License
Detail
I hereby grant to the Rutgers University Libraries and to my school the non-exclusive right to archive, reproduce and distribute my thesis or dissertation, in whole or in part, and/or my abstract, in whole or in part, in and from an electronic format, subject to the release date subsequently stipulated in this submittal form and approved by my school. I represent and stipulate that the thesis or dissertation and its abstract are my original work, that they do not infringe or violate any rights of others, and that I make these grants as the sole owner of the rights to my thesis or dissertation and its abstract. I represent that I have obtained written permissions, when necessary, from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis or dissertation and will supply copies of such upon request by my school. I acknowledge that RU ETD and my school will not distribute my thesis or dissertation or its abstract if, in their reasonable judgment, they believe all such rights have not been secured. I acknowledge that I retain ownership rights to the copyright of my work. I also retain the right to use all or part of this thesis or dissertation in future works, such as articles or books.
Copyright
Status
Copyright protected
Availability
Status
Open
Reason
Permission or license
Back to the top

Technical

RULTechMD (ID = TECHNICAL1)
ContentModel
ETD
OperatingSystem (VERSION = 5.1)
windows xp
CreatingApplication
Version
1.4
ApplicationName
macOS Version 10.14.4 (Build 18E226) Quartz PDFContext
DateCreated (point = end); (encoding = w3cdtf); (qualifier = exact)
2019-04-22T16:30:17
DateCreated (point = end); (encoding = w3cdtf); (qualifier = exact)
2019-04-22T16:30:17
Back to the top
Version 8.5.5
Rutgers University Libraries - Copyright ©2024