Staff View
Seismic stratigraphy of the Georges Bank Basin: implications for carbon sequestration

Descriptive

TitleInfo
Title
Seismic stratigraphy of the Georges Bank Basin: implications for carbon sequestration
Name (type = personal)
NamePart (type = family)
Adams
NamePart (type = given)
Alexandra Cathren
DisplayForm
Alexandra Cathren Adams
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
author
Name (type = personal)
NamePart (type = family)
Miller
NamePart (type = given)
Kenneth G
DisplayForm
Kenneth G Miller
Affiliation
Advisory Committee
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
chair
Name (type = personal)
NamePart (type = family)
Mountain
NamePart (type = given)
Gregory
DisplayForm
Gregory Mountain
Affiliation
Advisory Committee
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
internal member
Name (type = personal)
NamePart (type = family)
Monteverde
NamePart (type = given)
Donald
DisplayForm
Donald Monteverde
Affiliation
Advisory Committee
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
internal member
Name (type = corporate)
NamePart
Rutgers University
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
degree grantor
Name (type = corporate)
NamePart
School of Graduate Studies
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
school
TypeOfResource
Text
Genre (authority = marcgt)
theses
OriginInfo
DateCreated (encoding = w3cdtf); (qualifier = exact)
2019
DateOther (encoding = w3cdtf); (qualifier = exact); (type = degree)
2019-10
Language
LanguageTerm (authority = ISO 639-3:2007); (type = text)
English
Abstract (type = abstract)
I evaluate Cretaceous sediments in the western part of the Georges Bank Basin (WGBB), offshore Massachusetts, United States, for carbon capture and storage (CCS) potential as part of Mid-Atlantic Offshore Carbon Storage Resource Assessment Program (MAOCSRAP). Previous studies have recognized that Cretaceous sands in the GBB may be viable targets for carbon injection due to the high porosity and permeable nature of the reservoirs, as well as a suitable cap rock confinement, but questioned their suitability due to shallow burial depths. Using the modern techniques of sequence stratigraphy and a modern analysis software tool (Petrel), I evaluate WGBB CCS potential using ~13,800 km of recently released 2D multi-channel (MCS) profiles integrated with 10 previously interpreted geophysical well-logs from the Eastern GBB. By mapping significant seismic horizons, defining internal reflection terminations and seismic geometries correlated with depositional facies, I identify five Cretaceous seismic sequences within four sedimentary units. The Berriasian to Barremian fluvial-deposited sand-prone Missisauga Formation was deposited during a regressive interval with northern-sourced sediment depocenters. A transition to a relatively thin shale-rich depositional sequence, the Naskapi Shale, represents the beginning of a major marine transgression initiated during the early Aptian. As sedimentation rates increased in the Albian to early Cenomanian, and sequence depocenters subsequently shifted landward, depositional environments transitioned from primarily terrestrial to nearshore/shelf/deltaic coeval with deposition of the thick, sandy Logan Canyon Formation sequences. Slightly irregular, hummocky, low-angle Albian clinoforms occur in the southeastern region. Reflection surfaces become more parallel upsection, coinciding with deeper paleowater depths. Prograding Cenomanian shingled clinoforms associated with toplap and downlap indicate prodelta to nearshore environments. Turonian to Coniacian deposition of the shale Dawson Canyon Formation and a shift in sedimentary depocenters to outer shelf deposits suggest a marine regression following the Aptian to late Cenomanian rise in relative sea-level.
The sand reservoirs are mapped below the depth of supercritical CO2 storage (~800 m) and have sufficient shale cap rock confinement, therefore supporting the Lower Cretaceous Missisauga sands and mid-Cretaceous Logan Canyon sands in the southeastern subarea as potential viable targets for effective CCS. However, to assure successful sequestration, wells must be drilled locally to provide accurate porosity and permeability values, as well as to reinforce interpretations of the depositional facies and lithostratigraphy.
Subject (authority = local)
Topic
Seismic stratigraphy
Subject (authority = RUETD)
Topic
Geological Sciences
Subject (authority = LCSH)
Topic
Geology, Stratigraphic -- Cretaceous
Subject (authority = LCSH)
Topic
Marine sediments -- Massachusetts
RelatedItem (type = host)
TitleInfo
Title
Rutgers University Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Identifier (type = RULIB)
ETD
Identifier
ETD_10078
PhysicalDescription
Form (authority = gmd)
InternetMediaType
application/pdf
InternetMediaType
text/xml
Extent
1 online resource (viii, 79 pages) : illustrations
Note (type = degree)
M.S.
Note (type = bibliography)
Includes bibliographical references
RelatedItem (type = host)
TitleInfo
Title
School of Graduate Studies Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Identifier (type = local)
rucore10001600001
Location
PhysicalLocation (authority = marcorg); (displayLabel = Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey)
NjNbRU
Identifier (type = doi)
doi:10.7282/t3-arnh-jz68
Genre (authority = ExL-Esploro)
ETD graduate
Back to the top

Rights

RightsDeclaration (ID = rulibRdec0006)
The author owns the copyright to this work.
RightsHolder (type = personal)
Name
FamilyName
Adams
GivenName
Alexandra
Role
Copyright Holder
RightsEvent
Type
Permission or license
DateTime (encoding = w3cdtf); (qualifier = exact); (point = start)
2019-06-13 11:50:08
AssociatedEntity
Name
Alexandra Adams
Role
Copyright holder
Affiliation
Rutgers University. School of Graduate Studies
AssociatedObject
Type
License
Name
Author Agreement License
Detail
I hereby grant to the Rutgers University Libraries and to my school the non-exclusive right to archive, reproduce and distribute my thesis or dissertation, in whole or in part, and/or my abstract, in whole or in part, in and from an electronic format, subject to the release date subsequently stipulated in this submittal form and approved by my school. I represent and stipulate that the thesis or dissertation and its abstract are my original work, that they do not infringe or violate any rights of others, and that I make these grants as the sole owner of the rights to my thesis or dissertation and its abstract. I represent that I have obtained written permissions, when necessary, from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis or dissertation and will supply copies of such upon request by my school. I acknowledge that RU ETD and my school will not distribute my thesis or dissertation or its abstract if, in their reasonable judgment, they believe all such rights have not been secured. I acknowledge that I retain ownership rights to the copyright of my work. I also retain the right to use all or part of this thesis or dissertation in future works, such as articles or books.
RightsEvent
Type
Embargo
DateTime (encoding = w3cdtf); (qualifier = exact); (point = start)
2019-10-31
DateTime (encoding = w3cdtf); (qualifier = exact); (point = end)
2020-05-01
Detail
Access to this PDF has been restricted at the author's request. It will be publicly available after May 1st, 2020.
Copyright
Status
Copyright protected
Availability
Status
Open
Reason
Permission or license
Back to the top

Technical

RULTechMD (ID = TECHNICAL1)
ContentModel
ETD
OperatingSystem (VERSION = 5.1)
windows xp
CreatingApplication
Version
1.7
ApplicationName
Microsoft® Word for Office 365
DateCreated (point = end); (encoding = w3cdtf); (qualifier = exact)
2019-06-19T10:50:27
DateCreated (point = end); (encoding = w3cdtf); (qualifier = exact)
2019-06-19T10:50:27
Back to the top
Version 8.5.5
Rutgers University Libraries - Copyright ©2024