Staff View
Assessing approach-avoidance conflict in response to predator threat

Descriptive

TitleInfo
Title
Assessing approach-avoidance conflict in response to predator threat
Name (type = personal)
NamePart (type = family)
Francesconi
NamePart (type = given)
Jennifer A.
NamePart (type = date)
1989-
DisplayForm
Jennifer A. Francesconi
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
author
Name (type = personal)
NamePart (type = family)
McGann
NamePart (type = given)
John
DisplayForm
John McGann
Affiliation
Advisory Committee
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
chair
Name (type = personal)
NamePart (type = family)
Bieszczad
NamePart (type = given)
Kasia
DisplayForm
Kasia Bieszczad
Affiliation
Advisory Committee
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
co-chair
Name (type = personal)
NamePart (type = family)
West
NamePart (type = given)
Mark
DisplayForm
Mark West
Affiliation
Advisory Committee
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
co-chair
Name (type = personal)
NamePart (type = family)
Shiflett
NamePart (type = given)
Michael
DisplayForm
Michael Shiflett
Affiliation
Advisory Committee
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
outside member
Name (type = corporate)
NamePart
Rutgers University
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
degree grantor
Name (type = corporate)
NamePart
School of Graduate Studies
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
school
TypeOfResource
Text
Genre (authority = marcgt)
theses
OriginInfo
DateCreated (encoding = w3cdtf); (keyDate = yes); (qualifier = exact)
2019
DateOther (encoding = w3cdtf); (qualifier = exact); (type = degree)
2019-10
Language
LanguageTerm (authority = ISO 639-3:2007); (type = text)
English
Abstract (type = abstract)
Approach-avoidance conflict occurs when balancing actions intended to obtain a positive outcome against the known and unknown risks of a negative outcome. Here, we use the PORT, developed by Dent et al., (2014), to evoke a natural approach-avoidance conflict by exploiting predator-prey relationships. Briefly, to obtain a reward, animals must traverse through a chamber containing the innately feared odor, 2-Phenylethylamine (PEA), a synthetic volatile component of cat predator urine. Thus, this task nicely mimics the real-life tension between foraging and predation risk and should recruit natural circuits involved in processing innate threats. Both females and males demonstrate an initial apprehension to enter a chamber scented with predator odor, but not one scented with a novel odorant (MV) or clean bedding (CB). This apprehension was followed by increased time spent within those chambers, indicating similar exploratory behaviors to both a novel and predator odor. This is in direct opposition to previous literature demonstrating avoidance to predator odors. Females and males exposed to MV, exhibited similar levels of cFos immunoreactivity within the piriform cortex and when collapsing across all 13 brain regions quantified in this study. However, females had reduced cFos activity within the dorsomedial (DM) hypothalamus compared to males. Unlike MV and CB, behavioral responses between females and males diverged with exposure to PEA. In the presence of the predator cue, all females quickly transited the box to obtain the reward, while males exhibited a highly variable, possibly bi-modal distribution where half the males transited quickly but about half took longer than any female. This differential behavioral response was reflected by a PEA induced enhancement of female cFos immunoreactivity within the piriform cortex, DM hypothalamus, and when collapsing across all brain regions. Interestingly, it was only during PEA exposure, where this behavioral divergence occurred, that females showed greater DM hypothalamic activity than males. In both sexes, PEA exposure evoked heightened cFos activity within the central amygdala which indicates the anxiogenic nature of this stimulus. We also find that regardless of odor condition, females exhibited greater basolateral amygdala activity than males, whereas males demonstrated heightened defensive behaviors such as immobility and time spent close to the chamber walls. Overall, the findings suggest that the behavioral and neural differences between males and females in response to predator threat may reflect sex differences in risk-reward decision-making.
Subject (authority = RUETD)
Topic
Psychology
Subject (authority = LCSH)
Topic
Decision making in animals
Subject (authority = LCSH)
Topic
Predation (Biology)
RelatedItem (type = host)
TitleInfo
Title
Rutgers University Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Identifier (type = RULIB)
ETD
Identifier
ETD_10187
PhysicalDescription
Form (authority = gmd)
InternetMediaType
application/pdf
InternetMediaType
text/xml
Extent
1 online resource (v, 40 pages) : illustration
Note (type = degree)
M.S.
Note (type = bibliography)
Includes bibliographical references
RelatedItem (type = host)
TitleInfo
Title
School of Graduate Studies Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Identifier (type = local)
rucore10001600001
Location
PhysicalLocation (authority = marcorg); (displayLabel = Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey)
NjNbRU
Identifier (type = doi)
doi:10.7282/t3-wt0n-kw17
Genre (authority = ExL-Esploro)
ETD graduate
Back to the top

Rights

RightsDeclaration (ID = rulibRdec0006)
The author owns the copyright to this work.
RightsHolder (type = personal)
Name
FamilyName
Francesconi
GivenName
Jennifer
Role
Copyright Holder
RightsEvent
Type
Permission or license
DateTime (encoding = w3cdtf); (qualifier = exact); (point = start)
2019-08-27 11:29:15
AssociatedEntity
Name
Jennifer Francesconi
Role
Copyright holder
Affiliation
Rutgers University. School of Graduate Studies
AssociatedObject
Type
License
Name
Author Agreement License
Detail
I hereby grant to the Rutgers University Libraries and to my school the non-exclusive right to archive, reproduce and distribute my thesis or dissertation, in whole or in part, and/or my abstract, in whole or in part, in and from an electronic format, subject to the release date subsequently stipulated in this submittal form and approved by my school. I represent and stipulate that the thesis or dissertation and its abstract are my original work, that they do not infringe or violate any rights of others, and that I make these grants as the sole owner of the rights to my thesis or dissertation and its abstract. I represent that I have obtained written permissions, when necessary, from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis or dissertation and will supply copies of such upon request by my school. I acknowledge that RU ETD and my school will not distribute my thesis or dissertation or its abstract if, in their reasonable judgment, they believe all such rights have not been secured. I acknowledge that I retain ownership rights to the copyright of my work. I also retain the right to use all or part of this thesis or dissertation in future works, such as articles or books.
Copyright
Status
Copyright protected
Availability
Status
Open
Reason
Permission or license
Back to the top

Technical

RULTechMD (ID = TECHNICAL1)
ContentModel
ETD
OperatingSystem (VERSION = 5.1)
windows xp
CreatingApplication
Version
1.4
ApplicationName
Mac OS X 10.13.4 Quartz PDFContext
DateCreated (point = end); (encoding = w3cdtf); (qualifier = exact)
2019-09-22T18:35:40
DateCreated (point = end); (encoding = w3cdtf); (qualifier = exact)
2019-09-22T18:35:40
Back to the top
Version 8.5.5
Rutgers University Libraries - Copyright ©2024