Staff View
Early development and application of proof-like reasoning: longitudinal case studies

Descriptive

TitleInfo
Title
Early development and application of proof-like reasoning: longitudinal case studies
Name (type = personal)
NamePart (type = family)
Krupnik
NamePart (type = given)
Victoria
NamePart (type = date)
1988-
DisplayForm
Victoria Krupnik
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
author
Name (type = personal)
NamePart (type = family)
Maher
NamePart (type = given)
Carolyn A
DisplayForm
Carolyn A Maher
Affiliation
Advisory Committee
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
chair
Name (type = personal)
NamePart (type = family)
Goldin
NamePart (type = given)
Gerald A
DisplayForm
Gerald A Goldin
Affiliation
Advisory Committee
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
internal member
Name (type = personal)
NamePart (type = family)
Powell
NamePart (type = given)
Arthur
DisplayForm
Arthur Powell
Affiliation
Advisory Committee
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
internal member
Name (type = personal)
NamePart (type = family)
Uptegrove
NamePart (type = given)
Elizabeth
DisplayForm
Elizabeth Uptegrove
Affiliation
Advisory Committee
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
outside member
Name (type = personal)
NamePart (type = family)
Alston
NamePart (type = given)
Alice
DisplayForm
Alice Alston
Affiliation
Advisory Committee
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
outside member
Name (type = corporate)
NamePart
Rutgers University
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
degree grantor
Name (type = corporate)
NamePart
School of Graduate Studies
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
school
TypeOfResource
Text
Genre (authority = marcgt)
theses
OriginInfo
DateCreated (encoding = w3cdtf); (keyDate = yes); (qualifier = exact)
2020
DateOther (encoding = w3cdtf); (qualifier = exact); (type = degree)
2020-05
CopyrightDate (encoding = w3cdtf); (qualifier = exact)
2020
Language
LanguageTerm (authority = ISO 639-3:2007); (type = text)
English
Abstract (type = abstract)
This study traces three primary school students’ longitudinal development of mathematical ideas and ways of reasoning while solving a strand of counting problems. The students worked on well defined, open-ended counting problems of variable difficulty in various settings: pairs, whole class settings, task-based interviews and small groups. Video-taped data, transcripts, and student work are analyzed for cognitive growth in reasoning, attentive to the social elements of collaboration in problem solving. Data include individual and group co-construction of justifications for solutions. Video narratives (VMCAnalytics) describe the students’ learning progressions. Student dialogue and co-constructions that fostered their development are identified and displayed in the 13 published video narratives linked to the analyses. For each student, how do their recognition of patterns, use of strategies and representations, display of justifications and forms of reasoning about solutions to counting tasks develop over time and how might each journey be displayed with a learning progression using video data?

Analyses revealed local and global recognition for enumeration of outcomes (by recursive strategies), invention of composite operations, connection between tasks, rule generalization, and direct reasoning by cases, induction, controlling for variables. Particular forms of reasoning are identified for each student. The following cognitive and social factors revealed that learning occurred collaboratively, in a variety of settings. Students were attentive to the counter examples/arguments posed by others and worked to convince others about their arguments that were “proof like” in structure.

The longitudinal study showed how earlier ideas became the foundation for building later ideas, represented in more sophisticated ways. The results have implications for effective mathematical practices, such as collaborative learning, and attention to providing justifications for solutions. These pedagogical approaches can be incorporated in curriculum design, can supplement approaches to teacher professional development. The learning progressions can offer teachers an approach to formative assessment of student reasoning on solving counting tasks.
Subject (authority = local)
Topic
Proof-like justification
Subject (authority = RUETD)
Topic
Education
RelatedItem (type = host)
TitleInfo
Title
Rutgers University Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Identifier (type = RULIB)
ETD
Identifier
ETD_10662
PhysicalDescription
Form (authority = gmd)
InternetMediaType
application/pdf
InternetMediaType
text/xml
Note
Supplementary File: Supplementary Transcripts and Student Work for Krupnik (2020) Thesis
Extent
1 online resource (xv, 325, 21 pages) : illustrations
Note (type = degree)
Ph.D.
Note (type = bibliography)
Includes bibliographical references
RelatedItem (type = host)
TitleInfo
Title
School of Graduate Studies Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Identifier (type = local)
rucore10001600001
Location
PhysicalLocation (authority = marcorg); (displayLabel = Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey)
NjNbRU
Identifier (type = doi)
doi:10.7282/t3-426x-1369
Genre (authority = ExL-Esploro)
ETD doctoral
Back to the top

Rights

RightsDeclaration (ID = rulibRdec0006)
The author owns the copyright to this work.
RightsHolder (type = personal)
Name
FamilyName
Krupnik
GivenName
Victoria
Role
Copyright Holder
RightsEvent
Type
Permission or license
DateTime (encoding = w3cdtf); (qualifier = exact); (point = start)
2020-03-30 19:13:14
AssociatedEntity
Name
Victoria Krupnik
Role
Copyright holder
Affiliation
Rutgers University. School of Graduate Studies
AssociatedObject
Type
License
Name
Author Agreement License
Detail
I hereby grant to the Rutgers University Libraries and to my school the non-exclusive right to archive, reproduce and distribute my thesis or dissertation, in whole or in part, and/or my abstract, in whole or in part, in and from an electronic format, subject to the release date subsequently stipulated in this submittal form and approved by my school. I represent and stipulate that the thesis or dissertation and its abstract are my original work, that they do not infringe or violate any rights of others, and that I make these grants as the sole owner of the rights to my thesis or dissertation and its abstract. I represent that I have obtained written permissions, when necessary, from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis or dissertation and will supply copies of such upon request by my school. I acknowledge that RU ETD and my school will not distribute my thesis or dissertation or its abstract if, in their reasonable judgment, they believe all such rights have not been secured. I acknowledge that I retain ownership rights to the copyright of my work. I also retain the right to use all or part of this thesis or dissertation in future works, such as articles or books.
RightsEvent
Type
Embargo
DateTime (encoding = w3cdtf); (qualifier = exact); (point = start)
2020-05-31
DateTime (encoding = w3cdtf); (qualifier = exact); (point = end)
2022-05-31
Detail
Access to this PDF has been restricted at the author's request. It will be publicly available after May 31st, 2022.
Copyright
Status
Copyright protected
Availability
Status
Open
Reason
Permission or license
Back to the top

Technical

RULTechMD (ID = TECHNICAL1)
ContentModel
ETD
OperatingSystem (VERSION = 5.1)
windows xp
CreatingApplication
Version
1.7
DateCreated (point = end); (encoding = w3cdtf); (qualifier = exact)
2020-04-06T16:26:11
DateCreated (point = end); (encoding = w3cdtf); (qualifier = exact)
2020-04-06T16:26:11
RULTechMD (ID = TECHNICAL2)
ContentModel
ETD
CreatingApplication
ApplicationName
Microsoft Office Word
Version
16.0000
DateCreated (point = end); (encoding = w3cdtf); (qualifier = exact)
2020-03-29T16:35:00
DateCreated (point = end); (encoding = w3cdtf); (qualifier = exact)
2020-03-30T22:40:00
Back to the top
Version 8.5.5
Rutgers University Libraries - Copyright ©2024