LanguageTerm (authority = ISO 639-3:2007); (type = text)
English
Abstract
Despite the growing knowledge base about best practices in forensic evaluations in general, there is a current lack of literature focused on high-quality forensic evaluations in the field of child welfare. As child welfare evaluations have an impact on particularly vulnerable populations, it is paramount for measures of quality within these evaluations to be defined, examined, and measured. The purpose of this study was to contribute to the developing literature regarding forensic evaluations in child welfare by describing factors that lead to high-quality psychological evaluations and high-quality recommendations. This study examined a sample of 895 forensic evaluations in child welfare as a secondary data analysis of data that were originally collected by the New Jersey Coordination Center for Child Abuse and Neglect (NJCC). The concept of quality in this dissertation was defined as an evaluation that adheres to the objectives of New Jersey’s Department of Children and Families’ (DCF) Guidelines for Expert Evaluations in Child Abuse/Neglect Proceedings (2012). The variables in this study were measured by the Quality Improvement (QI) Tool, an instrument designed by the NJCC that supports forensic evaluation training, peer review, and supervision. A series of logistic regression models were analyzed with the following predictor variables: the presence of a diagnostic assessment, the integration of culture, and the clarity of the referral question. Subject age category and gender were also included in the analyses. It was found that the presence of a diagnostic assessment, integration of culture, the clarity of the referral question, and subject age category were all significant predictors of overall quality. Additionally, it was found that variable interaction terms were not significant predictors of overall quality. Results also showed that the presence of a diagnostic assessment and subject age category were significant predictors of quality of recommendations. Again, it was found that the variable interaction terms were not significant predictors of quality of recommendations. Implications for clinical practice are discussed, along with recommendations for future research.
Subject (authority = local)
Topic
Forensic evaluations
Subject (authority = RUETD)
Topic
School Psychology
RelatedItem (type = host)
TitleInfo
Title
Rutgers University Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Identifier (type = RULIB)
ETD
RelatedItem (type = host)
TitleInfo
Title
Graduate School of Applied and Professional Psychology Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Identifier (type = local)
rucore10001800001
Identifier
ETD_10645
Identifier (type = doi)
doi:10.7282/t3-q4j7-zx43
PhysicalDescription
Form (authority = gmd)
InternetMediaType
application/pdf
InternetMediaType
text/xml
Extent
1 online resource (ix, 140 pages)
Note (type = degree)
Psy.D.
Note (type = bibliography)
Includes bibliographical references
Location
PhysicalLocation (authority = marcorg); (displayLabel = Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey)
Rutgers University. Graduate School of Applied and Professional Psychology
AssociatedObject
Type
License
Name
Author Agreement License
Detail
I hereby grant to the Rutgers University Libraries and to my school the non-exclusive right to archive, reproduce and distribute my thesis or dissertation, in whole or in part, and/or my abstract, in whole or in part, in and from an electronic format, subject to the release date subsequently stipulated in this submittal form and approved by my school. I represent and stipulate that the thesis or dissertation and its abstract are my original work, that they do not infringe or violate any rights of others, and that I make these grants as the sole owner of the rights to my thesis or dissertation and its abstract. I represent that I have obtained written permissions, when necessary, from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis or dissertation and will supply copies of such upon request by my school. I acknowledge that RU ETD and my school will not distribute my thesis or dissertation or its abstract if, in their reasonable judgment, they believe all such rights have not been secured. I acknowledge that I retain ownership rights to the copyright of my work. I also retain the right to use all or part of this thesis or dissertation in future works, such as articles or books.